Brief Summary

Context: Most medical and surgical interventions for individuals with Cerebral Palsy (CP)-such as botulinum toxin injections, orthopedic surgery, and rehabilitation-occur during childhood. While these treatments are costly and resource-intensive, there is a significant lack of long-term data regarding their effectiveness in adulthood. Furthermore, the perspective of adult patients on the care they received as children is rarely documented. Understanding this "patient-centered" perspective is vital, as care aligned with an individual's values is proven to result in higher satisfaction and better health outcomes. Problem Statement While botulinum toxin (BTX) has been the gold standard for treating focal spasticity since 2009, it is an iterative (repeated) treatment that can involve procedure-induced pain. At present, there is limited knowledge about how adults with CP perceive the long-term impact of childhood vaccinations. The emotional and physical burden of repeated treatments during development is also not well understood, as are the coping strategies developed by these individuals to manage the stress and pain associated with long-term medical care. Objectives The PERTOXE study is a prospective study designed to explore the transition from childhood care to adult life for individuals with CP. Its primary goals are: Perception of Care: To evaluate how adults with CP perceive the effectiveness and impact of the botulinum toxin injections they received during childhood. Lived Experience: To document the subjective experience of treatment, including induced pain and the quality of communication with healthcare providers. Coping Mechanisms: To explore the "coping strategies" these individuals use to face stressful medical events and chronic functional decline. Significance As the lifespan of individuals with CP increases, understanding long-term outcomes is a research priority. By collecting data from adults, this study aims to improve current pediatric practices, ensuring that childhood interventions better support a high quality of life, functional maintenance, and psychological well-being in adulthood.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
3mo left

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Feb 2026Aug 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 29, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 22, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment experience

    This assessment is not based on a single scale, but on a series of multidimensional questions exploring the patient's memories on the treatment they received in childhood: * Induced pain: Assessment of the pain relief methods used (MEOPA, EMLA, anaesthesia, etc.). * Communication and preparation: Questions about the quality of preparation, how well the medical team listened, the consent process, and understanding of the purpose of the treatment. * Overall satisfaction: Use of satisfaction scales from 0 to 10 (where 0 = 'not at all satisfied' and 10 = 'perfectly satisfied') to rate effectiveness, conditions and communication.

    At enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Coping Strategies BRIEF-Cope Scale

    At enrollment

Study Arms (1)

Adults with cerebral pasly previously treated with botulinum toxin

Other: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Interventions

Participants will complete questionnaires regarding their perception of childhood botulinum toxin injections and their current coping strategies. No new medical treatment is administered.

Adults with cerebral pasly previously treated with botulinum toxin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults with cerebral palsy who experienced botulinum treatment during childhood

You may qualify if:

  • Participants aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Received repeated toxin injections during childhood (\> 2 series of injections)
  • Agreeing to complete the questionnaire
  • Possessing sufficient cognitive abilities, particularly in terms of reading comprehension and oral comprehension (even if someone had to physically assist them in responding)
  • All levels of the GMFCS classification 1 to 5

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who do not meet the above criteria, as confirmed by the statements in Part 1 of the survey, will be automatically excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CMCR des Massues

Lyon, 69005, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Interventions

Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health Care SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Services ResearchHealth PlanningHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsPatient Outcome AssessmentOutcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2025

First Posted

January 29, 2026

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations