Perioperative Ivonescimab Plus S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) for Locally Advanced Gastric or GEJ Adenocarcinoma
Huaxi
2 other identifiers
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether perioperative ivonescimab in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) is effective in treating locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The study will also assess the safety profile of this treatment regimen. Primary Objective: To determine whether perioperative ivonescimab plus SOX improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate compared with SOX alone in patients with locally advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Study Design: Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ivonescimab plus SOX or SOX alone to evaluate the potential added benefit of ivonescimab in this setting. Participation Details: Participants will receive the assigned treatment (ivonescimab plus SOX or SOX alone) every 21 days for approximately 4 months. They will visit the clinic once every 3 weeks for evaluations, laboratory tests, and monitoring. Participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record any symptoms or side effects experienced during the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 gastric-cancer
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 gastric-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
January 28, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.9 years
December 10, 2025
January 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0) assessed by investigators, defined as the complete absence of tumor cells in the primary tumor on pathological examination.
Perioperative
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Event-free survival (EFS)
Through study completion,an average of 2 years
major pathologic response
Perioperative
R0 resection
Perioperative
overall survival (OS)
Through study completion,an average of 2 years
disease-free survival (DFS)
Through study completion,an average of 2 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
SOX
ACTIVE COMPARATORoxaliplatin, S-1, four 3-week cycles were administered.
ISOX
EXPERIMENTALIn the ISOX group, the regimen included ivonescimab, oxaliplatin, and S-1.
Interventions
ivonescimab (20 mg/kg), four 3-week cycles were administered; ivonescimab was not administered in cycle 4. .
Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m², administered intravenously on day 1), four 3-week cycles were administered.
S-1 (administered orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle, with the daily dose determined by body surface area: \<1.25 m², 80 mg/day; ≥1.25 to \<1.5 m², 100 mg/day; ≥1.5 m², 120 mg/day), four 3-week cycles were administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-75 years.
- Histologically confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1.
- Clinically staged as T3-4a N+ M0 by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Considered eligible for curative resection.
- No prior antitumor therapy for the current disease.
- Adequate organ function, including hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function, as per prespecified laboratory criteria.
- Expected survival of ≥6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Known mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumor.
- Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg despite optimized antihypertensive therapy, or hypertension complicated by acute events (e.g., hypertensive crisis, hypertensive encephalopathy) that cannot be stably controlled.
- Tumor lesions with a bleeding tendency, including but not limited to: active ulcerative tumor lesions, hematemesis within 2 months prior to informed consent, high risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding as determined by the investigator.
- History of thromboembolic or arterial/venous vascular events within 6 months prior to enrollment, such as cerebrovascular events (including transient ischemic attack), deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.
- Gastrointestinal perforation or gastrointestinal obstruction within 6 months prior to enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
Related Publications (10)
Andre T, Tougeron D, Piessen G, de la Fouchardiere C, Louvet C, Adenis A, Jary M, Tournigand C, Aparicio T, Desrame J, Lievre A, Garcia-Larnicol ML, Pudlarz T, Cohen R, Memmi S, Vernerey D, Henriques J, Lefevre JH, Svrcek M. Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Adjuvant Nivolumab in Localized Deficient Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: The GERCOR NEONIPIGA Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):255-265. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00686. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
PMID: 35969830RESULTLorenzen S, Gotze TO, Thuss-Patience P, Biebl M, Homann N, Schenk M, Lindig U, Heuer V, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haag GM, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Bolling C, Hofheinz RD, Zhan T, Angermeier S, Ettrich TJ, Siebenhuener AR, Elshafei M, Bechstein WO, Gaiser T, Loose M, Sookthai D, Kopp C, Pauligk C, Al-Batran SE; AIO and SAKK Study Working Groups. Perioperative Atezolizumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer: Interim Results From the Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II/III DANTE/IKF-s633 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;42(4):410-420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00975. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
PMID: 37963317RESULTShah MA, Kennedy EB, Alarcon-Rozas AE, Alcindor T, Bartley AN, Malowany AB, Bhadkamkar NA, Deighton DC, Janjigian Y, Karippot A, Khan U, King DA, Klute K, Lacy J, Lee JJ, Mehta R, Mukherjee S, Nagarajan A, Park H, Saeed A, Semrad TJ, Shitara K, Smyth E, Uboha NV, Vincelli M, Wainberg Z, Rajdev L. Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;41(7):1470-1491. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02331. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
PMID: 36603169RESULTChao J, Fuchs CS, Shitara K, Tabernero J, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, De Vita F, Landers G, Yen CJ, Chau I, Elme A, Lee J, Ozguroglu M, Catenacci D, Yoon HH, Chen E, Adelberg D, Shih CS, Shah S, Bhagia P, Wainberg ZA. Assessment of Pembrolizumab Therapy for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Among Patients in the KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):895-902. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0275.
PMID: 33792646RESULTNie RC, Chen GM, Yuan SQ, Kim JW, Zhou J, Nie M, Feng CY, Chen YB, Chen S, Zhou ZW, Wang Y, Li YF. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Patients with Mismatch Repair Deficiency or Microsatellite Instability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;29(4):2324-2331. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11050-6. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
PMID: 34796431RESULTChoi YY, Bae JM, An JY, Kwon IG, Cho I, Shin HB, Eiji T, Aburahmah M, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Is microsatellite instability a prognostic marker in gastric cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;110(2):129-35. doi: 10.1002/jso.23618. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
PMID: 24737677RESULTPietrantonio F, Miceli R, Raimondi A, Kim YW, Kang WK, Langley RE, Choi YY, Kim KM, Nankivell MG, Morano F, Wotherspoon A, Valeri N, Kook MC, An JY, Grabsch HI, Fuca G, Noh SH, Sohn TS, Kim S, Di Bartolomeo M, Cunningham D, Lee J, Cheong JH, Smyth EC. Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3392-3400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01124. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
PMID: 31513484RESULTTran-Minh ML, Lehmann-Che J, Lambert J, Theou-Anton N, Pote N, Dior M, Mary F, Goujon G, Gardair C, Schischmanoff O, Kaci R, Cucherousset N, Bertheau P, Couvelard A, Aparicio T; for NORDICAP. Prevalence and prognosis of microsatellite instability in oesogastric adenocarcinoma, NORDICAP 16-01. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;45(4):101691. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101691. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33852952RESULTSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338RESULTArnold M, Ferlay J, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Soerjomataram I. Global burden of oesophageal and gastric cancer by histology and subsite in 2018. Gut. 2020 Sep;69(9):1564-1571. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321600. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PMID: 32606208RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gou Hongfeng
Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2025
First Posted
January 28, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Participant Data (IPD) may not be shared due to privacy and confidentiality concerns, legal or ethical restrictions, limitations in data sharing agreements or consent, intellectual property rights, commercial interests, or because of technical and resource constraints related to data anonymization and sharing.