Developing and Testing a Digital Health Tool for INterseCtional Stigma Assessment and Reduction at Multiple Levels and mUltiple DimEnsions (INCLUDE) to Improve HIV Care in ART Centers in Nepal
INCLUDE
2 other identifiers
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People living with HIV (PLWH) have poor clinical outcomes when they are excluded from care due to intersectional stigma related to HIV, mental health (MH), and other dimensions. Recent studies and reviews have highlighted three major challenges in identifying and addressing intersectional stigma: a lack of stigma assessment strategies that are multi-dimensional and can be incorporated into routine clinical care, a lack of tailored stigma-reduction activities, and a lack of implementation of multi-level interventions. These gaps make it difficult to recognize and address intersectional stigma, leading to poor HIV care outcomes globally. Digital health tools, co-designed with PLWH and healthcare workers (HCWs), have the potential to assist ART centers in addressing these challenges. Guided by the principles of human-centered design, our team has developed a digital tool with three components that can address the challenges in assessing, prioritizing, and addressing intersectional stigma in ART centers. The components include: 1) a dynamic assessment strategy that can be used during a clinic visit to collect both quantitative (i.e., ratings) and qualitative data (i.e., free text of client's perspectives) on stigma reported by PLWH; 2) a dashboard that incorporates this stigma assessment data alongside routine clinical data (i.e., existing registry of clients in the ART center) so that ART centers can directly link stigma with care engagement, and also identify relevant stigma-reduction activities; and 3) a repository of evidence-based, culturally appropriate activities that can reduce stigma at the intrapersonal-, interpersonal-, and clinic-levels. The three components of the digital intervention are theoretically grounded and are based on prior studies and consultations with local partners. The study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of INCLUDE among clients, HCWs, and ART center leads in four ART centers. For this aim, we will conduct a pilot trial at four ART centers to assess the acceptability and feasibility of INCLUDE. If successful, this study will provide an intervention that can be incorporated into routine clinical practice to systematically identify and address intersectional stigma to improve HIV care, and can be tested in a cluster randomized trial with ART centers in Nepal and other regions that face similar challenges.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
April 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.2 years
January 22, 2026
April 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Acceptability ratings
Acceptability of the INCLUDE tool among healthcare workers will be assessed via a quarterly survey. Ratings will be provided on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate greater acceptability. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of healthcare workers with specific rating categories.
9 months
Acceptability of the INCLUDE tool
Acceptability among PLWHs will be measured by serial in-depth interviews (IDIs) to understand their perspectives and overall experience with the INCLUDE tool.
4 and 9 months from baseline
Rate of assessment app launch
We will use paradata collected passively from the INCLUDE tool to measure the rate of assessment app launch per client per quarter.
9 months
Assessment Duration
The mean duration, in minutes, required for clients to complete the INCLUDE assessment form. Duration is calculated using passively collected system paradata, tracking the time from assessment initiation to submission.
9 months
Frequency of assessment completion
The number of completed assessment forms submitted by clients in the INCLUDE tool.
9 months
Frequency of user-led early termination/non-completion
The number of times the platform launch was terminated early or not completed by users.
9 months
Frequency of application errors/crashes
Frequency of the INCLUDE tool displaying error messages or crashing while in use (proportion of all user encounters where an error message/application crash occurs)
9 months
Rate of client data completion in the INCLUDE tool's dashboard
The completion rate of client data in the INCLUDE tool's dashboard relative to the total number of clients registered.
9 months
Feasibility of the INCLUDE intervention
We will conduct serial in-depth interviews (IDIs) with people living with HIV to ask about them about the feasibility of using the INCLUDE tool.
4 and 9 months from baseline
Rate of INCLUDE conference meetings
The rate of INCLUDE conference meetings will be defined as the percentage of scheduled monthly conference meetings conducted. This data will be derived from the research staff logs.
9 months
Conference meeting time
We will measure the average length of time spent in each conference meeting from research staff logs.
9 months
Rate of stigma-reduction activity being recommended
We will measure the rate of at least one stigma-reduction activity being recommended in response to assessment data from each client, as recorded in the counselor form of the INCLUDE tool.
9 months
Implementation rate of recommended activities
We will track the implementation rate of recommended stigma reduction activities from past conference meetings.
9 months
Study Arms (1)
INCLUDE
EXPERIMENTALINterseCtional stigma assessment and reduction at multiple Levels and mUltiple DimEnsions (INCLUDE) is a new digital health tool with three components that can address the challenges in assessing, prioritizing, and addressing intersectional stigma in ART centers. The components include: 1) an assessment strategy that can be used during a clinic visit to collect both quantitative (i.e., ratings) and qualitative data (i.e., free text of client's perspectives) on intersectional stigma reported by people living with HIV (PLWH); 2) a dashboard that incorporates this stigma assessment data alongside routine clinical data (i.e., existing registry of clients in the ART center) so that ART centers can directly link stigma with care engagement, and also identify relevant stigma-reduction activities; and 3) a repository of evidence-based, culturally appropriate activities that can reduce stigma at the intrapersonal-, interpersonal-, and clinic-levels.
Interventions
INterseCtional stigma assessment and reduction at multiple Levels and mUltiple DimEnsions (INCLUDE) is a new digital health tool with three components that can address the challenges in assessing, prioritizing, and addressing intersectional stigma in ART centers. The components include: 1) an assessment strategy that can be used during a clinic visit to collect both quantitative (i.e., ratings) and qualitative data (i.e., free text of client's perspectives) on intersectional stigma reported by people living with HIV (PLWH); 2) a dashboard that incorporates this stigma assessment data alongside routine clinical data (i.e., existing registry of clients in the ART center) so that ART centers can directly link stigma with care engagement, and also identify relevant stigma-reduction activities; and 3) a repository of evidence-based, culturally appropriate activities that can reduce stigma at the intrapersonal-, interpersonal-, and clinic-levels.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PLWH with poor HIV outcomes (a. been in care for more than 6 months but with detectable VL; b. missed clinic visit by more than a month; and/or c. did not pick up medications for more than 2 weeks from the expected refill date);
- age ≥18;
- screening positive for having mental health conditions (with the Generalized Anxiety-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 screening tools); and
- living in the ART (Anti-Retroviral Therapy) center's catchment area with no plans to leave during the study period.
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and/or Ethnic Minorities. Participants will be drawn randomly from this list, stratified by having additional stigma dimension(s) vs. not.
You may not qualify if:
- presence of significant cognitive problems/disability precluding participation
- All HCWs of ART centers: HIV counselors, ART center leads, and other HCWs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Possible
Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bibhav Acharya, MD
University of California, San Francisco
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sabitri Sapkota, PhD
Possible
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2026
First Posted
January 27, 2026
Study Start
February 12, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- IPD and supporting information will be available approximately 12 months following the end of the trial. IPD will be available to the research community in perpetuity.
- Access Criteria
- All shared data will be publicly accessible in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA).
We will publicly share the de-identified quantitative data by uploading in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA). For qualitative data, the documentation will include the structured notes.