NCT07370012

Brief Summary

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a clinical condition characterized by pain that arises either without an identifiable triggering factor or with a severity disproportionate to the initiating event. Its progression is typically unpredictable, and most therapeutic interventions yield only partial efficacy. Prism Adaptation Therapy (PAT) is a sensorimotor training method traditionally employed to mitigate attentional deficits in post-stroke hemispatial neglect and has recently been explored as a treatment modality for CRPS. Preliminary non-blinded studies with small patient cohorts have demonstrated its potential to reduce pain and related symptoms. The present study aims to assess the effects of prism adaptation therapy administered during the acute phase on pain intensity and other clinical outcomes in CRPS, addressing the considerable challenges associated with managing chronic pain in this disorder.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 4, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 30, 2024

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 28, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 19, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Upper Extremity RehabilitationBudapest CriteriaPain ManagementNeuropathic PainKinesiophobiaQuality of LifeUltrasonography / Edema gradingHand FunctionComplex Regional Pain Syndrome IComplex Regional Pain SyndromeCRPSPrism Adaptation TherapyPrism AdaptationNeglectCRPS IReflex Sympathetic DystrophyPrism GogglesVisuomotor AdaptationSensorimotor TrainingBody Perception DisturbanceNeglect-like SymptomsDistal Radius FractureUpper LimbWristRSD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is an instrument used to quantify pain intensity. It can be presented in either a vertical or horizontal orientation. Patients are asked, "If 10 represents the worst pain imaginable and 0 represents no pain, how much pain are you experiencing at this moment?" The scale consists of a 100-mm straight line on which patients indicate the severity of their symptoms. The left endpoint is typically labeled "no pain," while the right endpoint is labeled "worst pain imaginable." Patients mark the point on the line that best corresponds to their perceived pain level. The distance from the left endpoint to the marked point is then measured and recorded as the pain score.

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • LANNS

    The LANSS is employed to evaluate neuropathic pain. It comprises five pain-related questions and two sensory assessments.In the sensory assessment section, allodynia and pin-prick sensation are examined. A score of 12 or above indicates that the pain is likely neuropathic in nature. The maximum total score is 24.

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Evaluation of Joint Range of Motion

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • Assessment of Light Touch Sensation

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • Assessment of Grip and Lateral Pinch Strength

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • Measurement of Wrist Circumference

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • Assessment of Hand and Wrist Volume

    Baseline, post-treatment (Week 4), and follow-up (Week 10)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Prism Adaptation Therapy Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The prism adaptation therapy intervention group

Device: The Prism Adaptation Therapy Group

Control Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The control group that will undergo the protocol using sham goggles

Device: The Control Group

Interventions

Once daily for a total of 20 sessions, in addition to the standard physical therapy and rehabilitation program, a pointing protocol was conducted under the supervision of the same physician/physiotherapist using prismatic-lens goggles.

Prism Adaptation Therapy Group

Once daily for a total of 20 sessions, in addition to the standard physical therapy and rehabilitation program, a pointing protocol was conducted under the supervision of the same physician/physiotherapist using neutral-lens goggles (sham goggles).

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals aged between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients diagnosed with CRPS Type 1 according to the IASP 2003 CRPS Budapest diagnostic criteria
  • Presence of traumatic etiologies, including surgical procedures, fractures, or immobilization
  • Patients who consented to participate and provided written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of inflammatory, autoimmune, hematologic, or neoplastic diseases
  • Diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders, hepatic or renal failure
  • History of cranial trauma or cranial surgery within the preceding 6 months
  • Use of diuretics, anti-inflammatory, antineoplastic, corticosteroid, immunosuppressive, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medications within the past 2 months
  • Use of anticholinergic medications within the past 7 days
  • Active ocular infection, inflammation, allergy, or recent use/exposure to ophthalmic drops
  • History of lens or ocular surgery within the last 3 months
  • Current or previous use of glasses or contact lenses, or diagnosis of refractive error ≥0.5 diopters
  • Peripheral nerve injury in the affected hand consistent with CRPS Type 2 as per Budapest criteria
  • Known progressive or non-progressive peripheral or central nervous system disorders
  • CRPS Type 1 developing subsequent to central nervous system injury (e.g., stroke)
  • Patients in the acute phase following primary or secondary tendon repair
  • Presence of comorbid conditions likely to impair functionality and health-related quality of life, such as decompensated heart failure, chronic kidney failure, or malignancy
  • Comorbid diseases affecting hand function, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or other inflammatory disorders involving the hand
  • Joint restriction and/or muscle weakness in the affected extremity that would impede movement
  • +5 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Ankara, Ankara, 06170, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesWrist FracturesNeuralgiaAgnosiaKinesiophobiaReflex Sympathetic Dystrophy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Autonomic Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesWrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, BonePainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsPhobic DisordersAnxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • ECE ÜNLÜ AKYÜZ, MD, Prof.

    Ankara Etlik City Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants wore either prismatic-lens goggles or neutral-lens goggles during the pointing protocol. Both interventions were described as potentially beneficial.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were divided into two groups: one group received prism adaptation therapy, while the other underwent the identical protocol using sham goggles.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2026

First Posted

January 27, 2026

Study Start

October 4, 2023

Primary Completion

May 30, 2024

Study Completion

May 30, 2024

Last Updated

January 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to institutional policies and ethical considerations. De-identified, aggregate results will be reported in publications.

Locations