The Effect of Two Different Protocol in Wrist Joint Limitation After Distal Radius End Fractures
The Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation-Based Stretching and Mulligan Mobilization on Kinesiophobia and Proprioception in Wrist Joint Limitation After Distal Radius End Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures treated by hand therapists. These patients are most conservatively treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. Since there is an immobilization process after both treatments, a limitation in the range of motion of the joint occurs in patients. For this reason, most of the treatment models applied in rehabilitation are about restoring the range of motion of the joint. In general, kinesiophobia occurs due to joint limitation and pain. Loss of proprioception occurs in patients with mobility and desire as a result of kinesiophobia. By investigating the techniques used in rehabilitation, the more correct one for the patient can be selected. There is no clear result in the literature about which of the application methods is more effective. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) based stretching and Mulligan mobilization on pain, proprioception (joint position sense), wrist functionality, muscle strength and kinesiophobia in patients with joint limitation after distal radius end fracture. Thirty-four individuals aged 18-65 who were referred to a physiotherapy and rehabilitation program after distal radius end fracture will be included in the study. Individuals will be randomized into two groups. In the study, algometer and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the pain intensity of the patients, universal goniometer for the evaluation of the forearm and wrist joint range of motion, microFET®2 Digital Handheld Dynamometer for the evaluation of the strength of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles, ulnar and radial deviation muscles. device will be used. The functional use of the wrist of the individuals is using the patient-based wrist assessment questionnaire (Patient Graded Wrist Assessment PRWE), the sense of attachment position for proprioception, and the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS) for kinesiophobia. In our study, an exercise program will be applied with a physiotherapist for 6 weeks, 2 days a week, 45 minutes. To the first group; In addition to the traditional treatment, Mulligan mobilization will be applied, and the second group will be applied to the PNF techniques, 'hold-relax' in addition to the traditional treatment. It can be considerable that both techniques applied in our study may have positive effects on pain, kinesiophobia and proprioception.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2024
CompletedFebruary 13, 2024
February 1, 2024
2 months
April 13, 2023
February 12, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain Threshold Assessment
The pressure pain threshold in the wrist joint will be recorded by measuring with the Baseline Dolorimeter 66 pounds. In addition to subjective assessment methods, it is necessary to record before and after treatment using this device in order to evaluate pain more objectively and to be expressed in the literature as data with high scientific evidence level.
10 minutes
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) can be used to assess pain which perceived by patients. . VAS is a frequently used scale that indicates the severity of pain numerically. A 10 cm line is divided into 10 equal parts and both ends are numbered from 0 to 10 as the least and maximum pain intensity. Patients are asked to mark the place that best suits their pain intensity.
10 minutes
Muscle Strength Assessment
It is planned to use microFET®2 Digital Handheld Dynamometer device to evaluate the strength of wrist flexor and extensor muscles, ulnar and radial deviation muscles. The device has the feature of acquiring objective data and transferring it to a computer. Measurements are recorded in the range of 0-300 lbs. Measurements will be tested with 10 seconds of resistance in the muscle test position. The data of this device are needed to express the weakness in the wrist muscles after the distal radius end fracture as a quantitative value. Thus, the effectiveness of treatment programs can be compared by showing the effect of decreasing muscle strength.
8 minutes
Range of Motion Assessment (ROM)
The forearm and wrist joint range of motions will be performed with a universal goniometer in the patient sitting position and on the forearm examination table as degree. Evaluation will take place at weeks 6 and 12 (30-33).
10 minutes
Proprioception Assessment
The sensation of kinesthesia is measured by perceiving the minimum degree of motion of the joint per unit time and is generally used as the "passive motion detection threshold" in studies. Joint position sense; It is measured by the ability of a joint at a certain angle to actively or passively repeat the same position. As the error made while repeating the determined target angle decreases, the quality of the sense of joint position increases. Goniometer will be used for evaluation. The patients' deviations from the target angles for the wrist will be recorded as degree (33-37).
8 minutes
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
It will be used to assess kinesiophobia. The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale is a self-report measure developed to assess the fear of movement-related pain in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Its items are grouped as activity avoidance and somatic focus, according to two different factors (38,39).The scale is scored with range from 1-4, the negatively worded items are 4,8,12,1 and having a reverse scoring (4-1). The 17 item total scores are ranged from 17 to 68 where the lowest 17 means no kinesiophobia, and the higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
10 minutes
Study Arms (2)
PNF Treatment Group
EXPERIMENTALHold-relax is a PNF technique will be applied to this group.
Mulligan Mobilization Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Mobilization with movement (MWM) technique will be applied to this group.
Interventions
It is important for the therapist to organize a home exercise program to provide edema and pain control. The exercise program should be specific and clear to the patient. The exercise program will be taught to the patient and given as a home program
While the limb is in the agonist pattern, the patient is instructed to perform isometric contractions for 5-8 seconds against maximum resistance without movement at the limiting point. After maximum isometric contraction, the patient is instructed to actively relax.Participants in the second group will be applied 10 repetitions of isometric contractions for 8 seconds at the limitation points of the movement with the PNF techniques, the hold and relax active movement technique in the direction of wrist flexion and extension.
In thw Mobilization with movement technique; the patient is expected to perform painless ROM. After obtaining painless movement in the patients participating in the study, this application will be applied to the patient with the painless active movement technique in 10 repetitions and 2-3 sets. Rest time between sets will be 15-20 seconds. Patients will be taught self-mobilization to ensure the continuity of painless movement. Self-mobilization will be applied by the patient at home with 10 repetitions every two hours (29).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be directed to the physiotherapy program after distal radius fracture between the ages of 18-65,
- Having signed the Informed Consent Form
- Patients with good cooperation level
You may not qualify if:
- Being illiterate of reading and writing
- Having another orthopedic, neurological and cardiovascular problem
- Pre-existing complex regional pain syndrome
- Having had an operation involving the ipsilateral upper extremity in the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Biruni University
Istanbul, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (18)
Bruder AM, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, Shields N. Physiotherapy intervention practice patterns used in rehabilitation after distal radial fracture. Physiotherapy. 2013 Sep;99(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
PMID: 23200599RESULTBrown PW. Body and soul. J Hand Ther. 1996 Jul-Sep;9(3):201-2. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80082-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 8856564RESULTChen NC, Jupiter JB. Management of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):2051-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00020. No abstract available.
PMID: 17768207RESULTKaragiannopoulos C, Sitler M, Michlovitz S, Tierney R. A descriptive study on wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment and function following distal radius fracture intervention. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):204-14; quiz 215. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
PMID: 23628557RESULTCruess RL, Dumont J. Fracture healing. Can J Surg. 1975 Sep;18(5):403-13.
PMID: 1175109RESULTFrost HM. Mechanical determinants of bone modeling. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res. 1982;4(4):217-29. doi: 10.1016/0221-8747(82)90031-5.
PMID: 6763662RESULTIlyas AM, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures--classification of treatment and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;38(2):167-73, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.01.002.
PMID: 17560399RESULTJerrhag D, Englund M, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE. Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults - a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1596-z.
PMID: 28576135RESULTKhan SN, Bostrom MP, Lane JM. Bone growth factors. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;31(3):375-88. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70157-7.
PMID: 10882464RESULTYoudas JW, Krause DA, Egan KS, Therneau TM, Laskowski ER. The effect of static stretching of the calf muscle-tendon unit on active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Jul;33(7):408-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2003.33.7.408.
PMID: 12918866RESULTSchier JS, Chan J. Changes in life roles after hand injury. J Hand Ther. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):57-68; quiz 69. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.005.
PMID: 17254909RESULTSafi A, Hart R, Teknedzjan B, Kozak T. Treatment of extra-articular and simple articular distal radial fractures with intramedullary nail versus volar locking plate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Sep;38(7):774-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193413478715. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
PMID: 23442339RESULTReyhan AC, Sindel D, Dereli EE. The effects of Mulligan's mobilization with movement technique in patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(1):99-107. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181135.
PMID: 31104005RESULTReid SA, Andersen JM, Vicenzino B. Adding mobilisation with movement to exercise and advice hastens the improvement in range, pain and function after non-operative cast immobilisation for distal radius fracture: a multicentre, randomised trial. J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
PMID: 32291223RESULTde Palma L, Tulli A, Maccauro G, Sabetta SP, del Torto M. Fracture callus in osteopetrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):85-9.
PMID: 7955707RESULTOzaki A, Tsunoda M, Kinoshita S, Saura R. Role of fracture hematoma and periosteum during fracture healing in rats: interaction of fracture hematoma and the periosteum in the initial step of the healing process. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5(1):64-70. doi: 10.1007/s007760050010.
PMID: 10664441RESULTNoordeen MH, Lavy CB, Shergill NS, Tuite JD, Jackson AM. Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Jul;77(4):645-8.
PMID: 7615614RESULTMelton LJ 3rd, Amadio PC, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM. Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(4):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s001980050073.
PMID: 10024904RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
İrem Guney, PT
Biruni University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants does not know which type of treatment is received themselves.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2023
First Posted
June 1, 2023
Study Start
May 30, 2023
Primary Completion
July 15, 2023
Study Completion
January 25, 2024
Last Updated
February 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share