NCT07364110

Brief Summary

Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Spasticity (muscle spasm) is a common and disabling consequence of stroke. Lower extremity spasticity significantly compromises postural control, balance, and gait performance. Patients with spasticity demonstrate greater difficulty in standing and walking compared with non-spastic stroke survivors. Management of spasticity includes physical therapy modalities, exercise programs, orthoses, and pharmacological agents. In recent years, novel noninvasive treatment modalities including extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and low- and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) have been investigated for spasticity management however, robust evidence remains limited. ESWT is a treatment method applied by focusing high-pressure sound waves produced outside the body on the desired area of the body using a steel-tipped applicator. Patients can resume their daily activities immediately after a treatment session lasting between 5-20 minutes. Scientific researches have demonstrated that ESWT is a safe and effective modality for reducing upper and lower extremity spasticity after stroke. HILT is a a non-invasive, advanced therapeutic approach that utilizes high-intensity laser technology to promote healing and alleviate pain. It has been widely used in musculoskeletal disorders and generally well tolerated without significant adverse effects. Previous studies suggest that laser application to spastic muscles after stroke may reduce spasticity and pain. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of ESWT and HILT applied to the calf muscles on spasticity and functional gait parameters only with clinical examination methods in patients with stroke.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2021

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2022

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2025

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

December 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

strokespasticityequinus deformityextracorporeal shock wave therapyhigh-intensity laser therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    Plantar flexor spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), a widely used clinical instrument for evaluating resistance to passive movement. The MAS is employed to quantify increases in muscle tone and grades spasticity on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone and 4 indicates rigidity of the affected limb in flexion or extension.

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

  • Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment (FM-LE)

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

  • Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

  • 10-Meter Walk Test

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Baseline, at 3 weeks (end of intervention), and at 12 weeks (follow-up).

Study Arms (3)

Rehabilitation-only group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

All participants received a standardized rehabilitation program consisting of 1-hour sessions, 5 days per week, for 3 consecutive weeks. The program included: * Range of motion and stretching exercises targeting the hamstrings, rectus femoris, and ankle plantar flexors; * Strengthening exercises for hip flexors, hip extensors, knee extensors, hamstrings, ankle plantar flexors, and trunk muscles; * Gait training, postural exercises, balance training, transfer training, and endurance exercises, all performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist.

Procedure: Rehabilitation Protocol

ESWT plus rehabilitation group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the ESWT group received ESWT once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks (total of 3 sessions), in addition to the rehabilitation program. ESWT was applied to the gastrocnemius muscle belly in the prone position using a Starz Medical Masterpuls MP100 device, with the following parameters: frequency 5 Hz, energy flux density 0.340 mJ/mm², 2000 pulses, and a 15-mm applicator.

Device: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

HILT plus rehabilitation group

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to the rehabilitation program, participants in the HILT group received HILT three times per week for 3 consecutive weeks (total of 9 sessions). Each session lasted 4 minutes. HILT was applied to the gastrocnemius muscle belly in the prone position using longitudinal movements, with an energy density of 50 J/cm² and output power of 5 W in biostimulatory mode, using a BTL-6000 High-Intensity Laser device.

Device: High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT)

Interventions

All participants received a standardized rehabilitation program consisting of 1-hour sessions, 5 days per week, for 3 consecutive weeks. The program included: * Range of motion and stretching exercises targeting the hamstrings, rectus femoris, and ankle plantar flexors; * Strengthening exercises for hip flexors, hip extensors, knee extensors, hamstrings, ankle plantar flexors, and trunk muscles; * Gait training, postural exercises, balance training, transfer training, and endurance exercises, all performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist

Also known as: Exercise
Rehabilitation-only group

In addition to the rehabilitation program, participants in the HILT group received HILT three times per week for 3 consecutive weeks (total of 9 sessions). Each session lasted 4 minutes. HILT was applied to the gastrocnemius muscle belly in the prone position using longitudinal movements, with an energy density of 50 J/cm² and output power of 5 W in biostimulatory mode, using a BTL-6000 High-Intensity Laser device.

Also known as: 3
HILT plus rehabilitation group

Participants in the ESWT group received ESWT once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks (total of 3 sessions), in addition to the rehabilitation program. ESWT was applied to the gastrocnemius muscle belly in the prone position using a Starz Medical Masterpuls MP100 device, with the following parameters: frequency 5 Hz, energy flux density 0.340 mJ/mm², 2000 pulses, and a 15-mm applicator.

Also known as: 2
ESWT plus rehabilitation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • First-ever stroke;
  • At least 3 months elapsed since stroke onset;
  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Presence of ankle plantar flexor spasticity graded 1-3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS);
  • Ability to ambulate independently or under supervision with or without assistive devices/orthoses;
  • Sufficient cognitive capacity to understand and follow test instructions

You may not qualify if:

  • Fixed ankle contracture (peak ankle dorsiflexion \<0° with the knee in extension);
  • Current use of antispastic medications or a history of botulinum toxin injection within the previous 4 months;
  • Any orthopedic, rheumatologic, neurologic, cardiovascular, or visual comorbidity other than stroke that could affect gait;
  • Insufficient cognitive function.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Medical School

Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Mizuta N, Hasui N, Nakatani T, Takamura Y, Fujii S, Tsutsumi M, Taguchi J, Morioka S. Walking characteristics including mild motor paralysis and slow walking speed in post-stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 16;10(1):11819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68905-3.

  • Bushnell C, Bettger JP, Cockroft KM, Cramer SC, Edelen MO, Hanley D, Katzan IL, Mattke S, Nilsen DM, Piquado T, Skidmore ER, Wing K, Yenokyan G. Chronic Stroke Outcome Measures for Motor Function Intervention Trials: Expert Panel Recommendations. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Oct;8(6 Suppl 3):S163-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002098.

  • Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg. 1992 Oct;5(5):682-6.

  • Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008 May;88(5):559-66. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070205. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

  • Bohannon RW. Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;29(2):64-8. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200608000-00004.

  • Amelio E, Manganotti P. Effect of shock wave stimulation on hypertonic plantar flexor muscles in patients with cerebral palsy: a placebo-controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):339-43. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0522.

  • Troncati F, Paci M, Myftari T, Lombardi B. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy reduces upper limb spasticity and improves motricity in patients with chronic hemiplegia: a case series. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(3):399-405. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130970.

  • Starosta M, Marek K, Redlicka J, Miller E. Extracorporeal Shockwave Treatment as Additional Therapy in Patients with Post-Stroke Spasticity of Upper Limb-A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 30;13(7):2017. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072017.

  • Moon SW, Kim JH, Jung MJ, Son S, Lee JH, Shin H, Lee ES, Yoon CH, Oh MK. The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on lower limb spasticity in subacute stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Aug;37(4):461-70. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.4.461. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

  • Li TY, Chang CY, Chou YC, Chen LC, Chu HY, Chiang SL, Chang ST, Wu YT. Effect of Radial Shock Wave Therapy on Spasticity of the Upper Limb in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Prospective, Randomized, Single Blind, Controlled Trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3544. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003544.

  • Daliri SS, Forogh B, Emami Razavi SZ, Ahadi T, Madjlesi F, Ansari NN. A single blind, clinical trial to investigate the effects of a single session extracorporeal shock wave therapy on wrist flexor spasticity after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):67-72. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141193.

  • Guo P, Gao F, Zhao T, Sun W, Wang B, Li Z. Positive Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Spasticity in Poststroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;26(11):2470-2476. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

  • Dymarek R, Ptaszkowski K, Slupska L, Halski T, Taradaj J, Rosinczuk J. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave on upper and lower limb spasticity in post-stroke patients: A narrative review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Aug;23(4):293-303. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1141492. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

  • Radinmehr H, Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S, Olyaei G, Tabatabaei A. Effects of one session radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy on post-stroke plantarflexor spasticity: a single-blind clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Mar;39(5):483-490. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1148785. Epub 2016 Mar 13.

  • das Neves MF, Dos Reis MC, de Andrade EA, Lima FP, Nicolau RA, Arisawa EA, Andrade AO, Lima MO. Effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT 808 nm) on lower limb spastic muscle activity in chronic stroke patients. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(7):1293-300. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1968-x. Epub 2016 May 31.

  • Song HJ, Seo HJ, Lee Y, Kim SK. Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13126. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013126.

  • Chen B, Yang T, Liao Z, Sun F, Mei Z, Zhang W. Pathophysiology and Management Strategies for Post-Stroke Spasticity: An Update Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jan 5;26(1):406. doi: 10.3390/ijms26010406.

  • Kesar TM, Perumal R, Reisman DS, Jancosko A, Rudolph KS, Higginson JS, Binder-Macleod SA. Functional electrical stimulation of ankle plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles: effects on poststroke gait. Stroke. 2009 Dec;40(12):3821-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.560375. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

  • Thibaut A, Chatelle C, Ziegler E, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Spasticity after stroke: physiology, assessment and treatment. Brain Inj. 2013;27(10):1093-105. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

  • Young RR. Spasticity: a review. Neurology. 1994 Nov;44(11 Suppl 9):S12-20.

  • Jan S, Arsh A, Darain H, Gul S. A randomized control trial comparing the effects of motor relearning programme and mirror therapy for improving upper limb motor functions in stroke patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Sep;69(9):1242-1245.

  • Hankey GJ. Stroke. Lancet. 2017 Feb 11;389(10069):641-654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30962-X. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

  • Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, Elkind MS, George MG, Hamdan AD, Higashida RT, Hoh BL, Janis LS, Kase CS, Kleindorfer DO, Lee JM, Moseley ME, Peterson ED, Turan TN, Valderrama AL, Vinters HV; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064-89. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca. Epub 2013 May 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeMuscle SpasticityEquinus Deformity

Interventions

ExerciseExtracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsTalipesFoot Deformities, AcquiredFoot DeformitiesFoot Deformities, CongenitalLower Extremity Deformities, CongenitalLimb Deformities, CongenitalMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaUltrasonic TherapyDiathermyHyperthermia, InducedTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2025

First Posted

January 23, 2026

Study Start

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 30, 2022

Study Completion

March 30, 2022

Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication- ending 2 years after the publication of results
Access Criteria
Journal editors or reviewers may request this information from the corresponding author's email address if they deem it necessary.

Locations