NCT07361913

Brief Summary

Primary Objective: Score out of 44 on a validated test of anatomy and sono-anatomy Secondary Objective: Before training

  • Handedness (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
  • Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska scale)
  • Motor reaction time (Psychomotor Vigilance test)
  • Attention control (Anti-Saccade test)
  • Mental rotation (Mental Rotation Task)
  • Depression Anxiety, Stress (DASS score)
  • Visual Search Task (Divided Attention)
  • Knowledge pretraining After training and testing
  • Knowledge after training session
  • Acceptability: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
  • Usability: CyberSickness in Virtual Reality Questionnaire (CSQ-VR)
  • Immersion: Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire
  • Subjective workload (NASA - TLX scale)
  • Cognitive Demand Battery (CBD)
  • Resource use: Calculation of cost differences between learning Modalities Study population: Resident anaesthetists Recruitment Target: 102 Methodology: This is a non-clinical randomised controlled trial of resident anaesthetists undergoing training in regional anaesthesia. Residents will be randomised to one of two groups for each training session day:
  • Standard anatomical training (Group A)
  • Virtual reality based anatomical training. (Group B) Then followed by another training day session and participants will enter either standard or VR teaching depending on the previous allocation:
  • Standard anatomical training (Group B)
  • Virtual reality based anatomical training. (Group A) Anatomical knowledge will be tested in both groups using an on-line questionnaire developed by the Chief Investigator. Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria:
  • Anaesthetists that are residents in a recognised Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) training program
  • Anaesthetic training grades (Stage 1 - 3).
  • Visual impairment (this does not include wearing glasses/contact lenses)
  • History of severe diseases affecting physical motion or balance
  • History of any drugs that may affect physical motion or balance within 12 hours of the intervention
  • Pregnancy
  • Individuals who had consumed alcohol within 24 h of the intervention.
  • Resident doctors not in a recognised RCOA training program e.g. Staff grade anaesthetists.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started Jan 2026

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress32%
Jan 2026Jan 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2026

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 15, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual realitysonoanatomyregional anaesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Score out of 44 on a validated test of anatomy and sono-anatomy

    Sonoanatomy knowledge using Virtual Reality

    From enrolement to end of study day 2

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Handedness (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)

    2 - 4 weeks prior to study day 1

  • Visual Search Task (Divided Attention)

    2 - 4 weeks prior to study day 1

Study Arms (2)

Standard teaching

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard anatomical training

Other: Standard anatomy model teaching

Virtual reality

EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual reality based anatomical training

Other: 3D virtual reality anatomy teaching

Interventions

Knowledge of regional nerve anatomy among novice anaesthetists using 3D virtual reality is equivalent to standard teaching

Virtual reality

Knowledge of regional nerve anatomy among novice anaesthetists using standard anatomy model teaching

Standard teaching

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Anaesthetists that are residents in a recognised Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) training program
  • Anaesthetic training grades (Stage 1 - 3).

You may not qualify if:

  • Visual impairment (this does not include wearing glasses/contact lenses)
  • History of severe diseases affecting physical motion or balance
  • History of any drugs that may affect physical motion or balance within 12 hours of the intervention
  • Pregnancy
  • Individuals who had consumed alcohol within 24 h of the intervention.
  • Resident doctors not in a recognised RCOA training program e.g. Staff grade anaesthetists

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (8)

  • Motter BC, Simoni DA. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2382-93. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.020. Epub 2008 Sep 14.

    PMID: 18722398BACKGROUND
  • Shepard S, Metzler D. Mental rotation: effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Feb;14(1):3-11.

    PMID: 2964504BACKGROUND
  • Sereno AB, Holzman PS. Antisaccades and smooth pursuit eye movements in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Mar 15;37(6):394-401. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00127-O.

    PMID: 7772648BACKGROUND
  • Thomann J, Baumann CR, Landolt HP, Werth E. Psychomotor vigilance task demonstrates impaired vigilance in disorders with excessive daytime sleepiness. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Sep 15;10(9):1019-24. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4042.

    PMID: 25142762BACKGROUND
  • Zhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1994-z.

    PMID: 32334594BACKGROUND
  • Chytas D, Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Tsakotos G, Natsis K. Are extended reality technologies (ERTs) more effective than traditional anatomy education methods? Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Sep;44(9):1215-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-02998-5. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

    PMID: 35951086BACKGROUND
  • Mathew RK; Immersive Healthcare Collaboration; Mushtaq F. Three principles for the progress of immersive technologies in healthcare training and education. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 May 25;7(5):459-460. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000881. eCollection 2021. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35515725BACKGROUND
  • Orser BA, Spadafora SM. Competence-Based Training and Immersion Virtual Reality: Paradigm-Shifting Advances in Medical Education. Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2):220-222. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006116. Epub 2022 Jul 5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35839491BACKGROUND

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Boyne Bellew

    Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Masking Description
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Model Description
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2026

First Posted

January 23, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Last Updated

January 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share