RA Anatomy - VRvST Study
A Multicentre, Randomised Cross-over Equivalence Trial Investigating Knowledge of Anatomy Following Virtual Reality or Standard Teaching in Novice Anaesthetists
2 other identifiers
interventional
102
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Primary Objective: Score out of 44 on a validated test of anatomy and sono-anatomy Secondary Objective: Before training
- Handedness (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
- Subjective sleepiness (Karolinska scale)
- Motor reaction time (Psychomotor Vigilance test)
- Attention control (Anti-Saccade test)
- Mental rotation (Mental Rotation Task)
- Depression Anxiety, Stress (DASS score)
- Visual Search Task (Divided Attention)
- Knowledge pretraining After training and testing
- Knowledge after training session
- Acceptability: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
- Usability: CyberSickness in Virtual Reality Questionnaire (CSQ-VR)
- Immersion: Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire
- Subjective workload (NASA - TLX scale)
- Cognitive Demand Battery (CBD)
- Resource use: Calculation of cost differences between learning Modalities Study population: Resident anaesthetists Recruitment Target: 102 Methodology: This is a non-clinical randomised controlled trial of resident anaesthetists undergoing training in regional anaesthesia. Residents will be randomised to one of two groups for each training session day:
- Standard anatomical training (Group A)
- Virtual reality based anatomical training. (Group B) Then followed by another training day session and participants will enter either standard or VR teaching depending on the previous allocation:
- Standard anatomical training (Group B)
- Virtual reality based anatomical training. (Group A) Anatomical knowledge will be tested in both groups using an on-line questionnaire developed by the Chief Investigator. Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria:
- Anaesthetists that are residents in a recognised Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) training program
- Anaesthetic training grades (Stage 1 - 3).
- Visual impairment (this does not include wearing glasses/contact lenses)
- History of severe diseases affecting physical motion or balance
- History of any drugs that may affect physical motion or balance within 12 hours of the intervention
- Pregnancy
- Individuals who had consumed alcohol within 24 h of the intervention.
- Resident doctors not in a recognised RCOA training program e.g. Staff grade anaesthetists.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2027
January 23, 2026
October 1, 2025
12 months
January 15, 2026
January 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Score out of 44 on a validated test of anatomy and sono-anatomy
Sonoanatomy knowledge using Virtual Reality
From enrolement to end of study day 2
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Handedness (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
2 - 4 weeks prior to study day 1
Visual Search Task (Divided Attention)
2 - 4 weeks prior to study day 1
Study Arms (2)
Standard teaching
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard anatomical training
Virtual reality
EXPERIMENTALVirtual reality based anatomical training
Interventions
Knowledge of regional nerve anatomy among novice anaesthetists using 3D virtual reality is equivalent to standard teaching
Knowledge of regional nerve anatomy among novice anaesthetists using standard anatomy model teaching
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Anaesthetists that are residents in a recognised Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) training program
- Anaesthetic training grades (Stage 1 - 3).
You may not qualify if:
- Visual impairment (this does not include wearing glasses/contact lenses)
- History of severe diseases affecting physical motion or balance
- History of any drugs that may affect physical motion or balance within 12 hours of the intervention
- Pregnancy
- Individuals who had consumed alcohol within 24 h of the intervention.
- Resident doctors not in a recognised RCOA training program e.g. Staff grade anaesthetists
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (8)
Motter BC, Simoni DA. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2382-93. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.020. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
PMID: 18722398BACKGROUNDShepard S, Metzler D. Mental rotation: effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Feb;14(1):3-11.
PMID: 2964504BACKGROUNDSereno AB, Holzman PS. Antisaccades and smooth pursuit eye movements in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Mar 15;37(6):394-401. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00127-O.
PMID: 7772648BACKGROUNDThomann J, Baumann CR, Landolt HP, Werth E. Psychomotor vigilance task demonstrates impaired vigilance in disorders with excessive daytime sleepiness. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Sep 15;10(9):1019-24. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4042.
PMID: 25142762BACKGROUNDZhao J, Xu X, Jiang H, Ding Y. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1994-z.
PMID: 32334594BACKGROUNDChytas D, Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Tsakotos G, Natsis K. Are extended reality technologies (ERTs) more effective than traditional anatomy education methods? Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Sep;44(9):1215-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-02998-5. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
PMID: 35951086BACKGROUNDMathew RK; Immersive Healthcare Collaboration; Mushtaq F. Three principles for the progress of immersive technologies in healthcare training and education. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021 May 25;7(5):459-460. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000881. eCollection 2021. No abstract available.
PMID: 35515725BACKGROUNDOrser BA, Spadafora SM. Competence-Based Training and Immersion Virtual Reality: Paradigm-Shifting Advances in Medical Education. Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2):220-222. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006116. Epub 2022 Jul 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 35839491BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Boyne Bellew
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Masking Description
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2026
First Posted
January 23, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share