NCT07360067

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different atrial pacing sites-Bachmann's bundle pacing versus right atrial appendage pacing-on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy in patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
32mo left

Started Dec 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Dec 2025Dec 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 9, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2026

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

bachmann bundle pacing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium

    LA Volume Index measured as mL/m\^2

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium

    Reservoir Strain (%), Conduit Strain (%), Contraction Strain (%)

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation volume

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • Structural echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • Functional echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium

    6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Right Atrial Appendage Pacing

Right Atrial Appendage Pacing

Procedure: Right Atrial Appendage Pacing

Bachmann Bundle Pacing

Bachmann Bundle Pacing

Procedure: Bachmann Bundle Pacing

Interventions

Atrial lead positioned in the right atrial appendage

Right Atrial Appendage Pacing

Atrial lead positioned in the bachmann bundle branch

Bachmann Bundle Pacing

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who presented to Samsung Medical Center, were diagnosed with Sick Sinus Syndrome, and underwent de novo permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation based on clinical indications.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 19 years or older
  • Patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are scheduled for de novo implantation of a permanent pacemaker or permanent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Patients or their legal representatives who voluntarily consent to the access of medical records and study data throughout the entire research period

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with persistent or permanent AF
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year due to other comorbidities
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients who refuse active treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, Seoul, 06351, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):912-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00912.x.

  • Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, Tompkins BJ, Wayne S, Irvine B, Betageri O, Habel N, Till S, Lobel J, Meyer M, Lustgarten DL. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardiographic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac029.

  • Lustgarten DL, Habel N, Sanchez-Quintana D, Winget J, Correa de Sa D, Lobel R, Thompson N, Infeld M, Meyer M. Bachmann bundle pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1786. Epub 2024 Mar 27. No abstract available.

  • Martens P, Deferm S, Bertrand PB, Verbrugge FH, Ramaekers J, Verhaert D, Dupont M, Vandervoort PM, Mullens W. The Detrimental Effect of RA Pacing on LA Function and Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):895-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

  • Roithinger FX, Abou-Harb M, Pachinger O, Hintringer F. The effect of the atrial pacing site on the total atrial activation time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Mar;24(3):316-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00316.x.

  • De Sisti A, Leclercq JF, Stiubei M, Fiorello P, Halimi F, Attuel P. P wave duration and morphology predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial-based pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov;25(11):1546-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01546.x.

  • Elkayam LU, Koehler JL, Sheldon TJ, Glotzer TV, Rosenthal LS, Lamas GA. The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1593-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03192.x. Epub 2011 Aug 7.

  • Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG, Hobbs MS. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014 Dec 10;1(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. eCollection 2014.

  • Honarbakhsh S, Hunter L, Chow A, Hunter RJ. Bradyarrhythmias and pacemakers. BMJ. 2018 Mar 15;360:k642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k642. No abstract available.

  • Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sick Sinus Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmia, SinusArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHeart BlockCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Kim Ju Won, Clinical assistant professor, Ph.D

CONTACT

Lee Ju Hee, Clinical Research Nurse, Bachelor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2026

First Posted

January 22, 2026

Study Start

December 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

January 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations