Patient Satisfaction and Postoperative Pain After Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: Spinal Versus General Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a common ambulatory gynecological procedure that may be associated with perioperative discomfort and postoperative pain. The optimal anesthetic technique for improving patient comfort while ensuring rapid recovery remains controversial. This study aimed to compare spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia with a supraglottic airway in terms of postoperative pain and patient satisfaction following diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: The investigators conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study over a four-month period in a tertiary university hospital. After obtaining informed written consent, Adult women, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or stable III, without contraindications to spinal anesthesia, known allergy to anesthetic agents, full stomach, body mass index \>35 kg/m², history of migraine or communication difficulties, scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive either general anesthesia with an I-gel supraglottic airway (GA group) or spinal anesthesia (SA group). Heart rate, non invasif blood pressure and pulse oxymetry are monitored. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS). Secondary outcomes included recovery time, duration of stay in the PACU, and anesthesia-related complications. Statistical study: Data entry and analysis were performed by SPSS software version 26.0. We used Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. We retained a significance threshold for p less than 5%.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2026
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
4 months
January 14, 2026
January 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain scores evaluation
Numeric Rating Scale (minimum =1 maximum =10; 1-3:mild pain; 4-7:moderate pain; 8-10:severe pain) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2 was evaluated
Pain score was evaluated up to the second post operative day
patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS)
Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale is evaluated in the post operative first hour (11 statements; usually 6 choices from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"were evaluated;
Secondary Outcomes (3)
anesthesia complications
anesthesia complications was recorded in the post operative first day
duration of stay in the PACU
duration of stay in the PACU was evaluated in the postopertive second hour
recovery time
ome discharge delays was evaluated in the postoperative first four hours
Study Arms (2)
Group GA: General anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup GA: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with an I-gel supraglottic airway and post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluation
Group SA: Spinal anesthesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup SA: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under spinal anesthesia and post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluations
Interventions
* Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2. * Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- written informed consent.
- an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or stable III in
- women scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy
You may not qualify if:
- operative hysteroscopy.
- contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
- known allergy to anesthetic agents.
- full stomach.
- body mass index \>35 kg/m².
- history of migraine.
- communication difficulties
- Patients were excluded from the final analysis in case of:
- spinal anesthesia failure requiring conversion to general anesthesia.
- failure of ventilation with a supraglottic airway requiring tracheal intubation.
- conversion to laparotomy.
- prolonged hospitalization for non-anesthesia-related complications.
- loss to follow-up after discharge.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charles Nicolle hospital Tunis
Bab Saadoun, Tunis, 1006, Tunisia
Related Publications (6)
Nzau-Ngoma E, Odimba M, Kusuman A, Mboloko E. Office hysteroscopy: findings in patients attending a clinic in Kinshasa. The international society of endoscopic gynecology. 2022;
BACKGROUNDSamy A, Nabil H, Abdelhakim AM, Mahy ME, Abdel-Latif AA, Metwally AA. Pain management during diagnostic office hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized study. Climacteric. 2020 Aug;23(4):397-403. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1742685. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
PMID: 32299254BACKGROUNDManouchehrian N, Pilehvari S, Rahimi-Bashar F, Esna-Ashari F, Mohammadi S. Comparison of the effects of spinal anesthesia, paracervical block and general anesthesia on pain, nausea and vomiting, and analgesic requirements in diagnostic hysteroscopy: A non-randomized clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 1;10:1089497. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1089497. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36936226BACKGROUNDThe Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):e138-e148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003712.
PMID: 32080054BACKGROUNDStefanescu A, Marinescu B. Diagnostic hysteroscopy - a retrospective study of 1545 cases. Maedica (Bucur). 2012 Dec;7(4):309-14.
PMID: 23483793BACKGROUNDCentini G, Troia L, Lazzeri L, Petraglia F, Luisi S. Modern operative hysteroscopy. Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Apr;68(2):126-32. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
PMID: 26930389BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alia Jebri, MD
Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- patients are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of anesthesia and intensive care departement
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2026
First Posted
January 22, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
January 10, 2025
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share