NCT07358624

Brief Summary

Background: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a common ambulatory gynecological procedure that may be associated with perioperative discomfort and postoperative pain. The optimal anesthetic technique for improving patient comfort while ensuring rapid recovery remains controversial. This study aimed to compare spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia with a supraglottic airway in terms of postoperative pain and patient satisfaction following diagnostic hysteroscopy. Methods: The investigators conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study over a four-month period in a tertiary university hospital. After obtaining informed written consent, Adult women, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or stable III, without contraindications to spinal anesthesia, known allergy to anesthetic agents, full stomach, body mass index \>35 kg/m², history of migraine or communication difficulties, scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive either general anesthesia with an I-gel supraglottic airway (GA group) or spinal anesthesia (SA group). Heart rate, non invasif blood pressure and pulse oxymetry are monitored. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS). Secondary outcomes included recovery time, duration of stay in the PACU, and anesthesia-related complications. Statistical study: Data entry and analysis were performed by SPSS software version 26.0. We used Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. We retained a significance threshold for p less than 5%.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 14, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 22, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Diagnostic hysteroscopypostopertive painpatient satisfactionanesthesia complications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain scores evaluation

    Numeric Rating Scale (minimum =1 maximum =10; 1-3:mild pain; 4-7:moderate pain; 8-10:severe pain) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2 was evaluated

    Pain score was evaluated up to the second post operative day

  • patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS)

    Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale is evaluated in the post operative first hour (11 statements; usually 6 choices from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"were evaluated;

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • anesthesia complications

    anesthesia complications was recorded in the post operative first day

  • duration of stay in the PACU

    duration of stay in the PACU was evaluated in the postopertive second hour

  • recovery time

    ome discharge delays was evaluated in the postoperative first four hours

Study Arms (2)

Group GA: General anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group GA: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with an I-gel supraglottic airway and post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluation

Procedure: Group GA: post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluations

Group SA: Spinal anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group SA: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under spinal anesthesia and post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluations

Procedure: Group GA: post operative pain scores and patient satisfaction evaluations

Interventions

* Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), on postoperative day 1 and day 2. * Patient satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS)

Group GA: General anesthesiaGroup SA: Spinal anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • written informed consent.
  • an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I, II, or stable III in
  • women scheduled for diagnostic hysteroscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • operative hysteroscopy.
  • contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
  • known allergy to anesthetic agents.
  • full stomach.
  • body mass index \>35 kg/m².
  • history of migraine.
  • communication difficulties
  • Patients were excluded from the final analysis in case of:
  • spinal anesthesia failure requiring conversion to general anesthesia.
  • failure of ventilation with a supraglottic airway requiring tracheal intubation.
  • conversion to laparotomy.
  • prolonged hospitalization for non-anesthesia-related complications.
  • loss to follow-up after discharge.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Charles Nicolle hospital Tunis

Bab Saadoun, Tunis, 1006, Tunisia

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Nzau-Ngoma E, Odimba M, Kusuman A, Mboloko E. Office hysteroscopy: findings in patients attending a clinic in Kinshasa. The international society of endoscopic gynecology. 2022;

    BACKGROUND
  • Samy A, Nabil H, Abdelhakim AM, Mahy ME, Abdel-Latif AA, Metwally AA. Pain management during diagnostic office hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized study. Climacteric. 2020 Aug;23(4):397-403. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1742685. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

    PMID: 32299254BACKGROUND
  • Manouchehrian N, Pilehvari S, Rahimi-Bashar F, Esna-Ashari F, Mohammadi S. Comparison of the effects of spinal anesthesia, paracervical block and general anesthesia on pain, nausea and vomiting, and analgesic requirements in diagnostic hysteroscopy: A non-randomized clinical trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 1;10:1089497. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1089497. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 36936226BACKGROUND
  • The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;135(3):e138-e148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003712.

    PMID: 32080054BACKGROUND
  • Stefanescu A, Marinescu B. Diagnostic hysteroscopy - a retrospective study of 1545 cases. Maedica (Bucur). 2012 Dec;7(4):309-14.

    PMID: 23483793BACKGROUND
  • Centini G, Troia L, Lazzeri L, Petraglia F, Luisi S. Modern operative hysteroscopy. Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Apr;68(2):126-32. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

    PMID: 26930389BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient SatisfactionPain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehaviorPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Alia Jebri, MD

    Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
patients are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: GA Group: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under general anesthesia with an I-gel supraglottic airway. SA Group: patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy under spinal anesthesia
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of anesthesia and intensive care departement

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2026

First Posted

January 22, 2026

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

January 10, 2025

Last Updated

January 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations