Occlusal Adjustments Needed for Michigan Splints Made Using Different Digital Bite Records
AVOAMSDBR
The Assessment of The Volumetric Occlusal Adjustments Required for Michigan Splints Fabricated Using Various Digital Bite Registrations
2 other identifiers
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study evaluated digital occlusal recording methods used in the fabrication of Michigan occlusal splints. The objective was to assess whether different digital bite registration techniques influenced the accuracy of occlusal splints and the amount of occlusal adjustment required at clinical fitting. Participants underwent digital bite registration procedures and received Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using different digital workflows. Follow-up visits were conducted for splint fitting and occlusal assessment. Participant safety and data confidentiality were maintained throughout the study, and all required ethical approvals and risk assessments were obtained prior to study initiation. The study findings were intended to support improvements in digital dental workflows and enhance the accuracy and efficiency of occlusal splint fabrication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2026
CompletedJanuary 26, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.8 years
January 5, 2026
January 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Volumetric occlusal adjustment of michigan occlusal splints
The primary outcome was the volume of occlusal adjustment required for Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using different digital bite registration workflows. Volumetric changes were quantified by calculating root mean square (RMS) deviation values between pre-adjustment and post-adjustment digital scans of each splint using three-dimensional surface comparison software. Higher RMS values indicated greater occlusal adjustment.
Baseline (pre-adjustment) and at splint fitting (post-adjustment)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Occlusal contact quality after adjustment of michigan occlusal splints
At splint fitting visit
Other Outcomes (1)
Pattern of occlusal adjustment on splints after fitting
Baseline (before adjustment) and at splint fitting
Study Arms (4)
Retruded axis position(RAP with) without a digital facebow
EXPERIMENTALEach participant received Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using digital bite registration methods, including Retruded axis position(RAP with) without a digital facebow. Participants try each splint in a crossover manner while being blinded to the recording method used. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
Retruded axis position(RAP) with a digital facebow.
EXPERIMENTALEach participant received Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using digital bite registration methods, including Retruded axis position(RAP) with a digital facebow. Participants try each splint in a crossover manner while being blinded to the recording method used. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
Intercuspal position (ICP) with a digital facebow
EXPERIMENTALEach participant received Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using digital bite registration methods, including maximum intercuspal position (ICP) with a digital facebow. Participants try each splint in a crossover manner while being blinded to the recording method used. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
Intercuspal position (ICP) without a digital facebow.
EXPERIMENTALEach participant received Michigan occlusal splints fabricated using digital bite registration methods, including maximum intercuspal position (ICP) without a digital facebow. Participants try each splint in a crossover manner while being blinded to the recording method used. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
Interventions
The intervention involves the fabrication of Michigan occlusal splints using different digital bite registration workflows. Each participant undergoes digital occlusal recording in centric relation (CR) and intercuspal position (ICP), with and without the use of an Axioprisa® digital facebow, and articulation is performed using Axioprisa® virtual articulator. Four splints are fabricated per participant based on these recordings. Participants are blinded to the recording method used for each splint and try all splints in a crossover manner. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
The intervention involves the fabrication of Michigan occlusal splints using different digital bite registration workflows. Each participant undergoes digital occlusal recording in centric relation (CR) and intercuspal position (ICP), with and without the use of an Axioprisa® digital facebow, and articulation is performed using Axioprisa® virtual articulator. Four splints are fabricated per participant based on these recordings. Participants are blinded to the recording method used for each splint and try all splints in a crossover manner. Occlusal accuracy and adjustment requirements are evaluated using three-dimensional surface superimposition and root mean square (RMS) deviation analysis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 and 65.
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Have no more than one tooth missing per quadrant.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with removable dentures
- Patients receiving medication for psychological disorders.
- Patients diagnosed with systemic joint disorders.
- Pregnant.
- Patients who have received TMD treatment in the last 6 months.
- Deep bite cases.
- Those who have an extreme class 3 dental or skeletal relationship.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King's College Londonlead
- Guy's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
King's College London
London, Sothwarck, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Obrez A, et al. Accuracy of opening the vertical dimension on virtual articulators. J Prosthodont. 2019.
BACKGROUND1-Gross MD. The facebow: Use, misuse, and abuse. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:377-382.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to the type of digital bite registration method used to fabricate each of the four Michigan occlusal splints. Each participant is required to try four splints in a crossover manner, with splints coded and presented in identical appearance so that participants cannot distinguish which recording method was used for any given splint. Clinicians and researchers involved in splint fabrication and assessment are not blinded.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Arwa Ibrahim Alhusban
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2026
First Posted
January 21, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 15, 2025
Last Updated
January 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared due to the small sample size and the potentially identifiable nature of dental imaging and 3D surface data. Aggregate, anonymised results will be reported.