Comparison Between Conventional Versus 3D-Designed and Printed Stabilization Splints for Treatment of TMD Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of conventional stabilization splints versus 3D-designed and printed stabilization splints in treating temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TMD is a common cause of orofacial pain affecting the jaw joint and surrounding muscles. The trial evaluates outcomes such as pain reduction, clinical improvement, patient satisfaction, and time efficiency. By exploring a fully digital workflow for splint fabrication, this study aims to provide evidence on whether the newer 3D-printed approach offers superior results to conventional methods in terms of clinical effectiveness and procedural efficiency.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2025
CompletedJanuary 17, 2025
January 1, 2025
6 months
January 14, 2025
January 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
clinical improvement
Visual analogue scale
after 8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Conventional stabilization splint
ACTIVE COMPARATOR3D designed and printed stabilization splint
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
conventional versus 3D designed and printed stabilization splints
Conventional versus 3D designed and printed stabilization splints
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged (18-40) presenting with myalgia.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous orthodontic treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdallah Ahmed Hassan Hamed Refai, MSc candidate
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2025
First Posted
January 17, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01