NCT07355673

Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate if two different isolation techniques used during in-office bleaching influence the risk of gingival irritation. The secondary objectives were to investigate whether the isolation technique affects bleaching efficacy, the occurrence of tooth sensitivity, and the intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 16, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Gingival irritationVital BleachingIn-Office bleachingIsolation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Gingival Evaluation Recording

    Objective examination of gingival tissues was performed visually, documented with photographs, and verified using a periodontal probe. Patients were classified according to the Löe and Silness' gingival index as follows: G0 =normal gingiva; G1=mild inflammation (slight color change, slight edema, no bleeding on probing); G2=moderate inflammation (redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing); and G3=severe inflammation (marked redness and edema, ulceration, spontaneous bleeding).

    -15 minutes after the first bleaching session - 15 minutes after the second bleaching session

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Questionary of dental sensitivity

    Perioperative , 1 hour postoperative, 24 hours postoperative, 48 hours postoperative.

  • Shade evaluation of each patient

    Baseline, Before the first bleaching session, Revision (1 week after the 2 bleaching session)

Study Arms (2)

Relative Isolation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The relative isolation technique consists in inserting a lip retractor (OptraGate, Ivoclar Vivadent) and applying a gingival barrier resin (OpalDam, Ultradent Products) along the gingival margin, extending approximately 2-3 mm onto the enamel.

Device: Relative Isolation

Absolute isolation

EXPERIMENTAL

The total rubber dam isolation was carried out placing the dam (Flexidam non latex; Roeko) from premolar to premolar in both arches and stabilizing it with clamps (B4; Hygenic). Dental silk ligatures were used to achieve proper cervical retraction.

Device: Absolute Isolation

Interventions

General Examination with bite-wings, dental prophylaxis, alginate impressions of both arches, creation of individualized bleaching trays and position finder trays. . Absolute isolation of the gingival tissues. Two applications of the bleaching agent of 20 minutes

Absolute isolation

General Examination with bite-wings, dental prophylaxis, alginate impressions of both arches, creation of individualized bleaching trays and position finder trays. . Relative isolation of the gingival tissues. Two applications of the bleaching agent of 20 minutes

Relative Isolation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • No oral os systemic pathology
  • Periodontally Healthy
  • No cavities
  • Tooth shade of the canines A2 or darker

You may not qualify if:

  • Adhesive restorations or protheses in the anterior region
  • Enamel or dentin alterations
  • Smoking habits
  • Pregnant women
  • Undergone prior bleaching treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School of Medicine and Dentistry

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15705, Spain

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2025

First Posted

January 21, 2026

Study Start

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion

July 16, 2025

Study Completion

July 16, 2025

Last Updated

January 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations