Dilute Epinephrine vs Tourniquet for Visualization in Ankle Arthroscopy: A RCT
The Effect of Dilute Epinephrine Saline Irrigation on Field Clarity in Ankle Arthroscopic Surgery Compared to a Tourniquet: a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
88
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial investigates the effect of dilute epinephrine irrigation versus tourniquet use on visual field clarity (VFC) during ankle arthroscopy. Patients are randomized into an epinephrine group (normal saline with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3 L bag; tourniquet placed but not inflated unless needed) or a standard tourniquet group. The primary outcome is arthroscopic visual field clarity assessed using a 4-point Likert-style numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity at 2 and 24 hours (VAS), and the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiovascular adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
January 16, 2026
December 1, 2025
11 months
December 21, 2025
January 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual field clarity (VFC) under ankle arthroscopy, assessed using a 4-point Likert-style numeric rating scale (NRS)
Scores are integers ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating clearer visual field
at 2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Epinephrine group
EXPERIMENTALTourniquet group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Irrigation fluid consisted of normal saline mixed with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3-liter bag. A tourniquet was placed but left deflated as a rescue measure and could be inflated intraoperatively if necessary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to understand the procedures and methods of the clinical trial
- voluntarily provide written informed consent
- Aged from 15 to 65 years old , regardless of sex
- Diagnosed with a condition requiring ankle surgery
- Be scheduled to undergo unilateral ankle arthroscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who decline to participate in the study
- Known history of heart disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, cardiac conduction abnormalities), diabetes, or asthma
- Poorly controlled hypertension
- Age under 15 years or above 65 years old
- Intellectual disability
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Known allergy to sulfites
- Contraindications to ISBPB (including planned injection site infection, pre-existing neurological deficits, allergy to local anesthetics, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study was conducted using a double-blind design. After concealed randomization, only the principal investigator had access to group assignments, while participants, observers, and surgeons were blinded and identified solely by subject numbers. Upon enrollment and signing of informed consent, participants were informed that they would be randomly assigned to either the epinephrine group or the tourniquet group. Observers received only the corresponding subject numbers from the principal investigator and were responsible for data collection and recording without knowledge of group allocation. For surgeons, both groups had an inflatable tourniquet placed at the standard position prior to surgery. After verification by all three parties (participant, investigator, and surgical team), the surgeon left the room for 15 minutes. Group-specific interventions (inflating the tourniquet or not) were implemented after surgical draping was completed. Surgeons were then called in to perform th
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2025
First Posted
January 16, 2026
Study Start
December 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
January 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share