NCT07349407

Brief Summary

This multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial investigates the effect of dilute epinephrine irrigation versus tourniquet use on visual field clarity (VFC) during ankle arthroscopy. Patients are randomized into an epinephrine group (normal saline with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3 L bag; tourniquet placed but not inflated unless needed) or a standard tourniquet group. The primary outcome is arthroscopic visual field clarity assessed using a 4-point Likert-style numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity at 2 and 24 hours (VAS), and the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and cardiovascular adverse events.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Dec 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress35%
Dec 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 30, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 16, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

December 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Arthroscopic visual field

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual field clarity (VFC) under ankle arthroscopy, assessed using a 4-point Likert-style numeric rating scale (NRS)

    Scores are integers ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating clearer visual field

    at 2 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Epinephrine group

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Epinephrine group

Tourniquet group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Tourniquet group

Interventions

Irrigation fluid consisted of normal saline mixed with 1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine per 3-liter bag. A tourniquet was placed but left deflated as a rescue measure and could be inflated intraoperatively if necessary.

Epinephrine group

Standard tourniquet application

Tourniquet group

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to understand the procedures and methods of the clinical trial
  • voluntarily provide written informed consent
  • Aged from 15 to 65 years old , regardless of sex
  • Diagnosed with a condition requiring ankle surgery
  • Be scheduled to undergo unilateral ankle arthroscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who decline to participate in the study
  • Known history of heart disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, cardiac conduction abnormalities), diabetes, or asthma
  • Poorly controlled hypertension
  • Age under 15 years or above 65 years old
  • Intellectual disability
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known allergy to sulfites
  • Contraindications to ISBPB (including planned injection site infection, pre-existing neurological deficits, allergy to local anesthetics, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Central Study Contacts

zongyou Pan, Doctoral degree

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This study was conducted using a double-blind design. After concealed randomization, only the principal investigator had access to group assignments, while participants, observers, and surgeons were blinded and identified solely by subject numbers. Upon enrollment and signing of informed consent, participants were informed that they would be randomly assigned to either the epinephrine group or the tourniquet group. Observers received only the corresponding subject numbers from the principal investigator and were responsible for data collection and recording without knowledge of group allocation. For surgeons, both groups had an inflatable tourniquet placed at the standard position prior to surgery. After verification by all three parties (participant, investigator, and surgical team), the surgeon left the room for 15 minutes. Group-specific interventions (inflating the tourniquet or not) were implemented after surgical draping was completed. Surgeons were then called in to perform th
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2025

First Posted

January 16, 2026

Study Start

December 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share