Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Functional Capacity in Prefrail Older Adults
NeuroFit
Effectiveness of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Functional Capacity in Prefrail Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The general objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive neuromodulation combined with a therapeutic exercise program on neuroplasticity and, therefore, on variables related to functional capacity and quality of life, in prefrail older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2028
January 16, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.5 years
December 3, 2025
January 7, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Frailty Condition
Fried's criteria (Frailty Phenotype) will be used. Briefly, the participant will be considered frail if he or she meets three or more of the following criteria: i) unintentional weight loss greater than 4.5 kg in the last year; ii) feeling of general exhaustion, reported by the patient himself; iii) low level of physical activity; (iv) slowness of progress; v) muscle weakness, assessed by handgrip strength. Those patients who meet one or two criteria will be considered pre-frail and those who do not meet either will be considered non-frail
Five assessments: Baseline (T1); After the first session, at Day 1 (T2); Mid-term assessment, 4 weeks after the intervention starts (T3); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Walking speed
The 10m Walking Test will be used to assess the speed of the walk, which records the time needed to cover the distance of 10m. The higher the walking speed, the greater the functional capacity
Five assessments: Baseline (T1); After the first session, at Day 1 (T2); Mid-term assessment, 4 weeks after the intervention starts (T3); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Neuroplasticity
Three assessments: Baseline (T1); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Heart rate variability
Five assessments: Baseline (T1); After the first session, at Day 1 (T2); Mid-term assessment, 4 weeks after the intervention starts (T3); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Muscle strength
Three assessments: Baseline (T1); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Quality of life EQ-5D
Three assessments: Baseline (T1); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
Lower limb muscle power
Five assessments: Baseline (T1); After the first session, at Day 1 (T2); Mid-term assessment, 4 weeks after the intervention starts (T3); After the intervention, 8 weeks (T4); Four weeks after the end of the intervention (follow-up assessment) (T5).
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
rTMS group
EXPERIMENTALrTMS placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORtDCS group
EXPERIMENTALtDCS placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORVR group
EXPERIMENTALVR placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
24 HF-TMS sessions, 3 per week, with a duration of 20 minutes. Magnetic stimulation will be applied using a Neuro-MS/D transcranial magnetic stimulator (Neurosoft ®, Ivanovo, Russia) with a figure-eight coil. The coil will be placed tangentially to the skull in an anteromedial direction at 45º of M1 in the left hemisphere. They will then carry out a therapeutic exercise protocol (common to all groups) that will consist of performing lower limb exercises, including coordination, strength, balance and stretching exercises. The Borg Scale will be used to measure each person's perception of their effort, dyspnea and fatigue during each physical exercise.
The instrumentation will be the same as in the intervention with real rTMS, but the device will not emit any type of electrical stimulus. They will then perform the therapeutic exercise protocol explained above
The tDCS will be performed anodically (a-tDCS), and for 24 sessions, 3 days a week. The electrodes will be mounted on a neoprene helmet, in accordance with the International Standard 10-20 EEG System, for optimal targeting of the primary motor cortex M1. It will be a type of unihemispheric application, in which the anode will be located in the primary motor cortex (M1), and the cathode located in the orbitofrontal cortex contralateral to the anode. The treatment parameters will be: stimulation time of 20 minutes; intensity of 2mA, current rise-fall time at the beginning and end of stimulation of 30 seconds. They will then perform the therapeutic exercise protocol explained above.
The instrumentation will be the same as in the actual tDCS intervention, but the device will be programmed to increase the intensity from 0 to 2 mA progressively during the first 30 seconds and then cease to provide the patient with the initial itchy sensation on the skin, similar to the real application. They will then perform the therapeutic exercise protocol explained above.
24 sessions will be applied, 3 days a week. The patient will be placed standing (with an ad-hoc designed assistance system) in front of a mirror (located at waist height) and a height-adjustable screen (from waist to caudal) where a video of real legs running on a treadmill will be projected. In order for the participant to feel the projected legs as their own, people with different body sizes will have been previously recorded running to have recordings with legs of different size and length. Each session will last 20 minutes. They will then perform the therapeutic exercise protocol explained above.
The instrumentation of the participants will be the same as in the intervention with virtual running. However, the projection will consist of a series of videos of landscapes in which no type of human or animal movement will appear in order not to stimulate the motor areas of the brain. They will then perform the therapeutic exercise protocol explained above.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 65 -90 years old
- Meet 1-2 frailty criteria, according to Fried's Criteria.
- Ability to understand instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination \>23 points).
- Signing of the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- History of stroke within the past 6 months or hospital admission for any reason within the past 3 months.
- Alterations of the central or peripheral nervous system
- Alterations of the vestibular system
- Concomitant diseases
- Have a neurological pathology, cardiovascular musculoskeletal that contraindicates physical activity
- Epilepsy or history, medications that lower the seizure threshold
- Cardiac pacemaker, endocranial and hearing implants
- History of severe headaches
- Uncontrolled intracranial or arterial hypertension
- Heart and/or respiratory failure
- Implanted medication pump
- Skin lesions (psoriasis, eczema)
- Serious head surgeries
- Completing less than 80% of training sessions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Molla-Casanova S, Page A, Lopez-Pascual J, Ingles M, Sempere-Rubio N, Aguilar-Rodriguez M, Munoz-Gomez E, Serra-Ano P. Effects of mirror neuron activation therapies on functionality in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Geriatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;56:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
PMID: 38346365BACKGROUNDGlobal Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305057/
PMID: 26180873BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Posted
January 16, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2028
Last Updated
January 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01