Micro-ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Safety & Effectiveness
MicroUSgFLA
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical research study is intended to show that Micro-Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUSgFLA) is a safe procedure that can significantly postpone or eliminate the need for patients with intermediate-Risk prostate cancer (PCa) to undergo a definitive treatment (i.e., Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy) for their disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
January 14, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.1 years
September 4, 2025
January 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Outcome 1:
Number of Participants With Procedure-Related Adverse Events Time Frame: Up to 6 months after procedure Outcome Type: Safety Measure Description: Number and severity of procedure-related adverse events (AEs), graded according to CTCAE v5.0, to evaluate the safety profile of focal Micro-Ultrasound-Guided Focal Laser Ablation (MicroUS-gFLA) in patients with organ-confined intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Unit of Measure: Number of participants
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.
Primary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLA
Primary Outcome 2: Technical Success Rate of MicroUS-gFLA Time Frame: At completion of procedure; confirmed during follow-up up to 6 months Outcome Type: Feasibility Measure Description: Proportion of procedures achieving technical success, defined as: successful visualization and MicroUS-guided trocar insertion into the target lesion, and completion of focal laser ablation exactly as planned, as confirmed by intra-procedural imaging and follow-up mpMRI and/or biopsy. Unit of Measure: Percentage of procedures
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Secondary Outcome 1 - Change in PSA Level From Baseline
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months.
Secondary Outcome 2: Change in Urinary Function (IPSS Score)
From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 6 months
Secondary Outcome 3: Change in Erectile Function (IIEF-15 Score)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months
Study Arms (1)
Single-Arm Prospective Clinical Trial
EXPERIMENTALThis is a single arm study where patients with intermediate risk MR visible locally confined prostate cancer will be treated with Micro-Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation. Following treatment, the patients will be assessed by MRI and Biopsy at 6 months with PSA.
Interventions
x
Micro Ultrasound Guided Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer by The Diode Laser System - The TRANBERGCLS\|Thermal Therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men 40-80 years of age.
- Histologically-proven intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 7, primary grade ≤ 4).
- PCa clinical stage T1c or T2.
- MRI/MicroUS site suspicious for cancer or cancer mapped to one prostate lobe.
- Maximum dimension of MRI/MicroUS visible tumour ≤15mm.
- Suspicious site on Prostate MRI/MicroUS must coincide with sector positive for cancer on biopsy.
- Prostate specific antigen (PSA) level \< 15 ng/mL.
- IPSS, ICIQ-UI-SF, IIEF-15 questionnaires completed prior to the procedure.
- Life expectancy of greater than 10 years, based on co-morbidity not related to PCa.
You may not qualify if:
- Maximum dimension of MRI/MicroUS visible tumour \> 15 mm.
- Patients medically unfit for focal therapy of the prostate.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent.
- Patients who have received androgen suppression therapy.
- Patients who have received or are receiving chemotherapy for prostate carcinoma.
- Patients previously treated with surgery to the prostate (traditional, endoscopic or minimally invasive) including HIFU, TUNA, RITA, microwave, cryotherapy or any curative treatment.
- Patients who have undergone radiation therapy for PCa or to the pelvis.
- Any condition or history of illness or surgery that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risks to the patient (e.g. significant cardiovascular conditions or allergies).
- Patients with a history of non-compliance with medical therapy and/or medical recommendations.
- Patients who are unwilling or unable to complete the patient self-assessment questionnaires.
- Chronic or acute prostatitis, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, sphincter abnormalities, or any other symptom that prevents normal micturition.
- Patients who have participated in a clinical study and/or received treatment with an investigational treatment and/or product within the past 90 days.
- Patients with contraindication to MRI (i.e. pacemaker, hip prosthesis, severe claustrophobia, brain aneurysm clip, allergy to MRI contrast agent)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Health Network, Torontolead
- Exact Imagingcollaborator
- Clinical Laserthermia Systems ABcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Related Publications (18)
Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, Minasian LM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2239-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031918.
PMID: 15163773BACKGROUNDThompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Miller GJ, Ford LG, Lieber MM, Cespedes RD, Atkins JN, Lippman SM, Carlin SM, Ryan A, Szczepanek CM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 17;349(3):215-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030660. Epub 2003 Jun 24.
PMID: 12824459BACKGROUNDWenger H, Yousuf A, Oto A, Eggener S. Laser ablation as focal therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2014 May;24(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000044.
PMID: 24625427BACKGROUNDLindner U, Lawrentschuk N, Weersink RA, Davidson SR, Raz O, Hlasny E, Langer DL, Gertner MR, Van der Kwast T, Haider MA, Trachtenberg J. Focal laser ablation for prostate cancer followed by radical prostatectomy: validation of focal therapy and imaging accuracy. Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
PMID: 20346578BACKGROUNDLindner U, Weersink RA, Haider MA, Gertner MR, Davidson SR, Atri M, Wilson BC, Fenster A, Trachtenberg J. Image guided photothermal focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: phase I trial. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.035. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
PMID: 19683262BACKGROUNDPeters RD, Chan E, Trachtenberg J, Jothy S, Kapusta L, Kucharczyk W, Henkelman RM. Magnetic resonance thermometry for predicting thermal damage: an application of interstitial laser coagulation in an in vivo canine prostate model. Magn Reson Med. 2000 Dec;44(6):873-83. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:63.0.co;2-x.
PMID: 11108624BACKGROUNDGuillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, Afzal N, Charman S, Dudderidge T, Hosking-Jervis F, Hindley RG, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nigam R, Ogden C, Persad R, Shah K, van der Meulen J, Virdi J, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. A Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):422-429. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
PMID: 29960750BACKGROUNDAlibhai SM, Naglie G, Nam R, Trachtenberg J, Krahn MD. Do older men benefit from curative therapy of localized prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 1;21(17):3318-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.034.
PMID: 12947068BACKGROUNDReddy D, Bedi N, Dudderidge T. Focal therapy, time to join the multi-disciplinary team discussion? Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1526-1534. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.30.
PMID: 32676440BACKGROUNDLanger DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, Sun L, Yaffe MJ, Trachtenberg J, Haider MA. Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2--sparse versus dense cancers. Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):900-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080236.
PMID: 19011187BACKGROUNDEure G, Fanney D, Lin J, Wodlinger B, Ghai S. Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Mar;13(3):E70-E77. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5361. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
PMID: 30169149BACKGROUNDWeinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany CM, Thoeny HC, Verma S. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
PMID: 26427566BACKGROUNDGhai S, Eure G, Fradet V, Hyndman ME, McGrath T, Wodlinger B, Pavlovich CP. Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification. J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.093. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
PMID: 26791931BACKGROUNDKlotz L, Lughezzani G, Maffei D, Sanchez A, Pereira JG, Staerman F, Cash H, Luger F, Lopez L, Sanchez-Salas R, Abouassaly R, Shore ND, Eure G, Paciotti M, Astobieta A, Wiemer L, Hofbauer S, Heckmann R, Gusenleitner A, Kaar J, Mayr C, Loidl W, Rouffilange J, Gaston R, Cathelineau X, Klein E. Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Jan;15(1):E11-E16. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6712.
PMID: 32701437BACKGROUNDJohansson JE, Andren O, Andersson SO, Dickman PW, Holmberg L, Magnuson A, Adami HO. Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2713-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2713.
PMID: 15187052BACKGROUNDMcLeod DG, Iversen P, See WA, Morris T, Armstrong J, Wirth MP; Casodex Early Prostate Cancer Trialists' Group. Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care vs standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2006 Feb;97(2):247-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.06051.x.
PMID: 16430622BACKGROUNDRamirez AG, Trapido EJ. Advancing the Science of Cancer in Latinos. 2022 Nov 15. In: Ramirez AG, Trapido EJ, editors. Advancing the Science of Cancer in Latinos: Building Collaboration for Action [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2023. Chapter 1. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK595808/
PMID: 37816115BACKGROUNDPotosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Stephenson RA, Penson DF, Harlan LC. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh259.
PMID: 15367568BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sangeet Ghai, MD
The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2025
First Posted
January 14, 2026
Study Start
April 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results for up to 5 years thereafter.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be available to investigators with methodologically sound research proposals for use in projects related to prostate imaging, focal therapy, or outcomes research. All requestors will be required to sign a data use agreement to ensure participant confidentiality. Data requests should be submitted to the study principal investigator. Approved proposals will be granted access via a secure institutional data-sharing platform.
De-identified individual participant data that relate to the results reported in the primary publication (e.g., baseline demographics, imaging findings, treatment parameters, outcomes, and adverse events).