Intraocular Pressure in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
The Effect Of Trans-Anbdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) And Total Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) Procedures on Intraocular Pressure in Laparoscopıc Inguinal Hernia Repair :A Procspective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inguinal hernia is a common clinical condition, accounting for approximately 75% of abdominal wall hernias. The inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most common operations worldwide. The primary treatment for inguinal hernia is surgical options. In addition to the standard open surgical approach, the Lichtenstein technique, laparoscopic methods such as transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches are currently the most commonly used surgical procedures. Both methods result in less postoperative pain, seroma, chronic pain, hematoma, and wound infection compared to the Lichtenstein technique. Many surgeons use the Trendelenburg position, approximately 30 to 45 degrees, when performing laparoscopic procedures. The advantage of the Trendelenburg position is that it allows for better visualization of the abdominal and pelvic organs and creates space for the operation. However, the Trendelenburg position also has some complications, such as increasing intraocular pressure. Also, in laparoscopic surgeries, pneumoperitoneum is created by introducing CO₂ gas into the abdomen. This increases intra-abdominal pressure, causing the diaphragm to be pushed upward and raising thoracic pressure. As a result, central venous pressure increases and intracranial venous return becomes difficult, which can lead to a temporary increase in intraocular pressure. Perioorbital swelling and venous congestion caused by prolonged surgery time and the position used can cause compartment syndrome in the orbital space and even lead to vision loss. The current literature indicates that the increase in intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery, the patient's position, and the surgery time can lead to an increase in intraocular pressure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2026
CompletedJanuary 14, 2026
January 1, 2026
6 months
January 2, 2026
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
TAPP procedure effects intraocular pressure
Preooeratively and postoperatively measured intraocular pressure with Goldmann's aplanasyon tonometry
Preooeratively and postoperative first day
TEP procedure effects intraocular pressure
Preooeratively and postoperatively measured intraocular pressure with Goldmann's aplanasyon tonometry
Preooeratively and postoperative first day
Study Arms (2)
TAPP Group
Planned groin hernia patients who will operated with Transabdominal Preperitoneal technique
TEP GRoup
Planned groin hernia patients who will operated with Trans Extra-Preperitoneal technique
Interventions
Preoperative Intraocular Pressure measurement for both eyes with Goldmann applanation tonometry before surgery
Postoperative first day's Intraocular Pressure measurement for both eyes with Goldmann applanation tonometry
Eligibility Criteria
Selecetive laparoscopic groin hernia repair patients
You may qualify if:
- Being over 18 years of age
- Having been diagnosed with inguinal hernia
- Those wishing to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients diagnosed with glaucoma
- Patients with rheumatological diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, etc.)
- Patients with chronic kidney and liver failure
- Patients who have undergone corneal transplantation
- Patients with malignancy
- Patients diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia
- Patients with ocular trauma
- Myopia or hyperopia exceeding three diopters
- Patients using systemic steroids
- Body Mass Index \> 30 kg/m2
- Those who do not wish to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital
Elâzığ, 23100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (13)
Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;25(4):835-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.4.835.
PMID: 8921464BACKGROUNDRutkow IM. Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg Clin North Am. 1998 Dec;78(6):941-51, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70363-7.
PMID: 9927978BACKGROUNDLau H, Fang C, Yuen WK, Patil NG. Risk factors for inguinal hernia in adult males: a case-control study. Surgery. 2007 Feb;141(2):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.014. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
PMID: 17263984BACKGROUNDRobinson A, Light D, Kasim A, Nice C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of radiology in the diagnosis of occult inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):11-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2412-3. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
PMID: 22733195BACKGROUNDAkhavan A, Gainsburg DM, Stock JA. Complications associated with patient positioning in urologic surgery. Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.060. Epub 2010 May 23.
PMID: 20546878BACKGROUNDKaur G, Sharma M, Kalra P, Purohit S, Chauhan K. Intraocular Pressure Changes during Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position in Patients Anesthetized with Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared to Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Comparative Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):67-72. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_177_17.
PMID: 29628557BACKGROUNDHoshikawa Y, Tsutsumi N, Ohkoshi K, Serizawa S, Hamada M, Inagaki K, Tsuzuki K, Koshimizu J, Echizen N, Fujitani S, Takahashi O, Deshpande GA. The effect of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure and visual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;98(3):305-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303536. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
PMID: 24064941BACKGROUNDMolloy BL. Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure. AANA J. 2011 Apr;79(2):115-21.
PMID: 21560974BACKGROUNDAiolfi A, Cavalli M, Ferraro SD, Manfredini L, Bonitta G, Bruni PG, Bona D, Campanelli G. Treatment of Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):954-961. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004735.
PMID: 33427757RESULTAndresen K, Rosenberg J. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
PMID: 38963034RESULTIossa A, Traumueller Tamagnini G, De Angelis F, Micalizzi A, Lelli G, Cavallaro G. TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how? Front Surg. 2024 Jul 15;11:1352196. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39077677RESULTScheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2017 May 10;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0253-7.
PMID: 28490321RESULTAwad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, Roth A, Yan W, Fernandez S, Roth S, Patel V. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):473-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a9098f.
PMID: 19608821RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mehmet B Bozan, Professor
Turkish Health Sciences University Elazig City Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Associate MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2026
First Posted
January 13, 2026
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share