A Brain-Computer Interface-Based Attention Training Program Compared With Methylphenidate and Citicoline
Brain-Computer
Comparative Effects of BCI-Based Attention Training, Methylphenidate, and Citicoline on Attention and Executive Function in School-Age Children: A Naturalistic Quasi-Experimental Study
1 other identifier
observational
174
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether a brain-computer interface (BCI)-based attention training program, used alone or together with medication, can improve attention, executive functioning, and emotional regulation in school-age children with attention difficulties. The study focuses on school-age children who were referred for problems with attention, concentration, or related cognitive and emotional difficulties. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does BCI-based attention training improve children's attention and response control when used on its own? Do children show greater improvements when BCI-based attention training is combined with medication such as methylphenidate or citicoline? Are there differences in attention, executive functioning, or emotional symptoms between children receiving combined approaches versus single treatments? Researchers compared four naturally occurring treatment approaches to see whether combining attention training with medication leads to better outcomes than using one method alone. Participants will: Take part in a computerized, game-based BCI attention training program that uses brain signals to guide training tasks Receive medication (methylphenidate or citicoline) if this was part of their usual clinical care Complete computerized attention tests that measure focus, reaction time, and impulse control Have parents complete questionnaires about attention, behavior, emotions, and everyday executive functioning before and after the intervention This study was conducted in a real-world clinical setting and reflects routine treatment choices made by families and clinicians, rather than random assignment. The findings aim to help families and health care providers better understand how different treatment combinations may support attention and self-regulation in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedJanuary 12, 2026
December 1, 2025
9 months
December 16, 2025
December 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Conners Continuous Performance Test-Third Edition (CPT-3)
Outcome Measure 1:Conners Continuous Performance Test-Third Edition CPT-3)-Omission Errors.Number of omission errors reflecting inattention, reported as standardized T-scores based on CPT-3 normative data.Unit of Measure: T-score. Outcome Measure 2:CPT-3-Commission Errors. Number of commission errors reflecting impulsivity (standardized T-scores derived from CPT-3 normative data).Unit of Measure: T-score. Outcome Measure 3:CPT-3-Perseverations.Number of perseverative responses reflecting response control difficulties, reported as standardized T-scores based on CPT-3 normative data.Unit of Measure: T-score. Outcome Measure 4:CPT-3-Hit Reaction Time(HRT).Mean reaction time for correct responses (standardized T-scores derived from CPT-3 normative data).Unit of Measure: T-score. Outcome Measure 5:CPT-3-Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation(HRT SD).Variability of reaction time across correct responses, reported as standardized T-scores based on CPT-3 normative data.Unit of Measure: T-score.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
1. Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV)
8 weeks
2. Barkley Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Scale
8 weeks
3. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS), Parent Version
8 weeks
4. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
8 weeks
5. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
8 weeks
Study Arms (4)
COGO + Methylphenidate
Children in this cohort receive a combined intervention consisting of a brain-computer interface (BCI)-based attention training program (COGO) together with methylphenidate prescribed as part of routine clinical care. The attention training is delivered through game-based computerized sessions that adapt to the child's attention-related brain signals. Methylphenidate dosing follows standard clinical practice and is determined by the treating clinician.
COGO + Citicoline
Children in this cohort receive the same BCI-based attention training program (COGO) combined with citicoline supplementation. Citicoline is administered in age-appropriate doses as part of usual clinical care. The BCI training consists of structured, game-based sessions designed to support sustained attention and cognitive control.
COGO Only
Children in this cohort participate only in the BCI-based attention training program (COGO), without concurrent stimulant medication or citicoline supplementation. The training is delivered through computerized, game-based sessions that adjust task demands based on real-time attention-related brain signals.
Citicoline Only
Children in this cohort receive citicoline supplementation alone, without participation in the BCI-based attention training program. Citicoline is administered in age-appropriate doses as part of routine clinical management for attention-related difficulties.
Interventions
The intervention consists of a brain-computer interface (BCI)-based attention training program delivered through computerized, game-based tasks that adapt in real time to the participant's attention-related brain activity recorded via EEG. Task difficulty and progression are dynamically adjusted based on neural markers of attentional engagement, creating a closed-loop training environment designed to support sustained attention, response control, and executive functioning. In some participants, this training is used in combination with pharmacological or nutraceutical support as part of routine clinical care. Methylphenidate is prescribed according to standard pediatric clinical guidelines and individualized clinical judgment. Citicoline is administered in age-appropriate doses as a nutritional supplement intended to support cognitive and neural functioning. No experimental dosing or protocol-driven medication adjustments are applied. All interventions are delivered in a naturalistic
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of school-age children referred to a child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinic due to attention-related difficulties. All participants have a clinical diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and were receiving routine clinical care at the time of enrollment. The population reflects a real-world clinical sample, including children with varying levels of attentional, executive-function, and emotional difficulties commonly observed in pediatric ADHD. Treatment selection was based on usual clinical decision-making rather than random assignment.
You may qualify if:
- School-age children (approximately 6-18 years)
- Clinical diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
- Presence of attention or executive-function difficulties requiring clinical follow-up
- Participation in one of the routine clinical interventions (BCI-based attention training, methylphenidate, citicoline, or their combination)
- Completion of baseline and post-intervention assessments
- Written informed consent obtained from a parent or legal guardian
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy, traumatic brain injury)
- Intellectual disability or severe developmental disorder that would prevent participation in computerized assessments
- Current use of additional psychotropic medications other than methylphenidate
- Significant sensory or motor impairment interfering with computer-based testing
- Incomplete assessment data or inability to complete the intervention period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Uludag University
Bursa, 16440, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
1. da Silva, B. S., Grevet, E. H., Silva, L. C. F., Ramos, J. K. N., Rovaris, D. L., & Bau, C. H. D. (2023). An overview on neurobiology and therapeutics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Discover mental health, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-022-00030-1 2. Hwang, S., Meffert, H., Parsley, I., Tyler, P. M., Erway, A. K., Botkin, M. L., Pope, K., & Blair, R. J. R. (2019). Segregating sustained attention from response inhibition in ADHD: An fMRI study. NeuroImage. Clinical, 21, 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101677 3. Noah, A.A., Sedky, H.E. New frontiers in pharmacological treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 398, 15025-15035 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-04328-z 4. Levy, F., Pipingas, A., Harris, E. V., Farrow, M., & Silberstein, R. B. (2018). Continuous performance task in ADHD: Is reaction time variability a key measure?. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 14, 781-786. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S158308 5. Kansakar, U., Trimarco, V., Mone, P., Varzideh, F., Lombardi, A., & Santulli, G. (2023). Choline supplements: An update. Frontiers in endocrinology, 14, 1148166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1148166 6. Hübner, I. B., Scheibe, D. B., Marchezan, J., & Bücker, J. (2024). Use of Citicoline in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Pilot Study. Clinical neuropharmacology, 47(5), 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000602 7. Ölçüoğlu R. (2025). Neurofeedback for ADHD: Exploring the Role of Quantitative EEG and Brainwave Modulation. Brain and behavior, 15(8), e70714. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70714 8. Jeunet, C., Glize, B., McGonigal, A., Batail, J. M., & Micoulaud-Franchi, J. A. (2019). Using EEG-based brain computer interface and neurofeedback targeting sensorimotor rhythms to improve motor skills: Theoretical background, applications and prospects. Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology, 49(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Serkan Turan
Uludag University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 8 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2025
First Posted
January 12, 2026
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 10, 2025
Last Updated
January 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared, as the data were collected in a naturalistic clinical setting and include sensitive health information. De-identified aggregate data may be reported in publications.