BTX-A and Mirror Therapy for Chronic Stroke Spasticity
The Combined Effect of Botulinum Toxin Type A and Mirror Therapy in the Management of Chronic-Phase Upper Extremity Spasticity After Ischemic Stroke: A Double-Blind, Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, particularly affecting the upper extremities and thus negatively impacting patients' activities of daily living and quality of life. Upper extremity spasticity, characterized by increased muscle tone and tendon reflexes, leads to functional limitations. While Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) is widely used to manage spasticity and can temporarily alleviate symptoms, it does not directly support neuroplasticity and often requires repeated injections. Mirror therapy (MT) has emerged as a promising rehabilitation approach with the potential to stimulate motor recovery and cortical reorganization. It is hypothesized that combining MT with BTX-A injections may more effectively reduce spasticity and improve upper extremity function. In this study, a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, prospective design was employed to investigate the effects of adding MT to BTX-A treatment on spasticity and upper extremity motor function in stroke patients. A total of 30 patients, who received BTX-A injections, were divided into two groups: an experimental group receiving mirror therapy and a control group receiving sham therapy (using transparent glass). All patients also underwent a standardized conventional rehabilitation program, and the BTX-A injection protocol was kept consistent. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by comparing pre-injection measurements with those at six months post-injection, using the Brunnstrom Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer Scale, and a hand dynamometer. The findings are expected to shed light on the potential benefits of simultaneous MT and BTX-A administration, including reducing injection frequency, and to guide more comprehensive approaches in the rehabilitation of chronic stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2026
CompletedJanuary 12, 2026
February 1, 2025
9 months
February 25, 2025
January 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
FUGL MAYER SCORE
The Fugl-Meyer Motor Section focuses on evaluating the motor functions of the upper and lower extremities in individuals who have had a stroke. The tests in this section are scored based on fundamental parameters such as muscle activity, synergy patterns, joint movement control, and coordination. The total motor score commonly reaches 66 points (although there are versions with different point ranges). A higher Fugl-Meyer Motor Section score reflects better motor function in the individual.
6 MONTH
Secondary Outcomes (2)
ASHWORTH SCALE
6 MONTH
BRUNNSTROM LEVEL
6 MONTH
Study Arms (2)
BTX-A and MİRROR THERAPY
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were asked to sit in a chair and place both forearms on an exercise table with their elbows flexed at 90 degrees. To administer mirror therapy, the direct view of both the healthy and the hemiplegic hand and wrist was blocked using a partition method. A mirror was then placed between the two forearms, ensuring that the mirror image of the healthy-side wrist overlapped with the position of the hemiplegic-side wrist. By observing the healthy hand's movements through the mirror during the exercises, a visual movement illusion was created for the hemiplegic hand.
BTX-A + Sham Mirror Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the sham group, however, a transparent glass was used instead of a mirror, and participants were asked to watch the wrist movements of the paralyzed side through the glass, providing visual feedback without creating an illusion. The sham procedure was applied for the same duration using the transparent glass
Interventions
Botulinum toxin type A was administered via intramuscular injections into the spastic upper limb muscles based on clinical evaluation. Injection sites and dosages were individualized according to the distribution and severity of spasticity. All injections were performed prior to the rehabilitation interventions.
Sham mirror therapy was performed using a transparent glass panel instead of a mirror, allowing visual feedback without inducing a mirror illusion. Session frequency and duration were identical to those of the mirror therapy group.
Mirror therapy was performed with participants seated and both forearms placed on a table. A mirror was positioned between the limbs to create a visual illusion of movement of the affected limb by observing the movements of the unaffected limb.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of unilateral ischemic stroke
- Under the routine medical follow-up of the same clinician who plans upper extremity BTX treatment based on standard medical indications
- At least 3 months post-stroke
- Signed informed consent form
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \>24
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment score \<55
- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of 1-4
You may not qualify if:
- Any prior BTX-A or other injections administered to the upper extremity Severe cognitive impairment or any mental disorder preventing effective communication
- Concurrent enrollment in another experimental treatment program
- Visual or motor deficits that would prevent the application of mirror therapy
- History of multiple strokes
- Presence of neuromuscular pathology in the unaffected extremity
- Stroke due to a non-ischemic cause
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Liv hospital Vadistanbul
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2025
First Posted
January 12, 2026
Study Start
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion
February 15, 2025
Study Completion
May 15, 2025
Last Updated
January 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share