Multicenter RCT: LED Red Light Dose-Response in Myopia Progression Control
Multicenter, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Dose-Response Relationship of LED Red Light in Controlling Myopia Progression
1 other identifier
interventional
364
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the effectiveness and safety of non-laser LED red light combined with defocus lens therapy for controlling myopia progression and evaluate the impact of different intervention durations in 6-14 years old children and adolescents with myopia (spherical equivalent refraction: -6.00D ≤ SER ≤ -1.00D), regardless of gender. The main questions it aims to answer are: \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 1\]: Does the combination of Yingtong Vision Rehabilitation Instrument (non-laser LED red light) and Hoya DIMS defocus lens show non-inferior effectiveness to Hoya DIMS defocus lens alone in controlling 6-month axial length change? \[primary hypothesis or outcome measure 2\]: Do different single intervention durations (2min, 3min, 4min) of non-laser LED red light affect the effectiveness (e.g., axial length change at multiple time points, 12-month SER change) and safety of the combined therapy? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Test Group A (2min PBM therapy + DIMS lenses), Test Group B (3min PBM therapy + DIMS lenses), Test Group C (4min PBM therapy + DIMS lenses), and Control Group D (DIMS lenses alone)\] to see if the combined therapy has similar or better myopia control effects and comparable safety, and to identify the optimal intervention duration. Participants will: Complete screening examinations (axial length, refractive error, visual acuity, IOP, fundus photography, OCT, etc.) and sign the informed consent form. Be randomly assigned to one of the four groups and receive the corresponding intervention (use the Yingtong Vision Rehabilitation Instrument as per group-specific duration twice a day, with ≥4-hour interval, plus DIMS lenses; or only DIMS lenses). Attend regular follow-up visits at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months for efficacy and safety assessments (including repeated ocular examinations and adverse event reporting). Cooperate with the entire 12-month trial process and comply with the device usage specifications and follow-up requirements.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
January 9, 2026
December 1, 2025
1.3 years
December 29, 2025
December 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
6-month axial length change
The difference in axial length at 6 months after trial initiation compared with the baseline axial length
6-month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
1-, 3-, 9- and 12-month axial length changes
1-, 3-, 9- and 12-month
12-month spherical equivalent refraction (SER) change
12-month
Other Outcomes (2)
Adverse event rate and serious adverse event rate
1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month
12-month visual adverse event rate
12-month
Study Arms (4)
Test Group A
EXPERIMENTALPBM therapy with single intervention duration of 2 minutes + wearing Hoya DIMS defocus lens
Test Group B
EXPERIMENTALPBM therapy with single intervention duration of 3 minutes + wearing Hoya DIMS defocus lens
Test Group C
EXPERIMENTALPBM therapy with single intervention duration of 4 minutes + wearing Hoya DIMS defocus lens
Control Group D
ACTIVE COMPARATORWearing Hoya DIMS defocus lens only
Interventions
Input voltage: 6V (4 × 1.5V alkaline dry batteries). Red light wavelength: 650nm; light spot diameter: outer diameter 5.0mm, inner diameter 1.5mm. Light source output power: 1.6 mW (±0.1mW at 30mm from the observation window). The Yingtong Vision Rehabilitation Instrument should be used twice a day under the regular communication and supervision of hospital optometrists/coordinators (via phone, WeChat, etc.), with an interval of at least 4 hours.
Frame glasses worn on the bridge of the nose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 6 to 14 years old, regardless of gender;
- After cycloplegic autorefraction, monocular or binocular spherical equivalent refraction (SER) meets: -6.00D ≤ SER ≤ -1.00D, and binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 0.8 (logMAR 0.1; Snellen 20/25);
- Binocular anisometropia ≤ 1.50D; astigmatism ≤ 2.50D;
- Able to understand the purpose of the study, willing to participate in this clinical verification, sign the informed consent form personally or through their legal guardian, and cooperate with the entire trial process (12 months).
You may not qualify if:
- Photophobia or allergy to cycloplegic agents (e.g., tropicamide or cyclopentolate);
- Received any of the following myopia control measures within one month (including but not limited to): low-concentration atropine eye drops, orthokeratology lenses, myopia control-related frame glasses, low-level red light therapy, defocus soft contact lenses, or defocus RGP lenses;
- Subjects with ocular diseases that may affect visual acuity or refractive error (e.g., lens disorders such as cataracts, glaucoma, macular degeneration, corneal diseases, uveitis, retinal detachment, severe vitreous opacity, etc.);
- Neurological diseases (previous convulsion history, epilepsy, tic disorders, central nervous system developmental abnormalities) or mental and psychological diseases;
- Systemic diseases: immune system diseases, central nervous system diseases, Down syndrome, asthma, severe cardiopulmonary function impairment, severe liver and kidney dysfunction, acute or chronic sinusitis, or diabetes mellitus;
- Binocular manifest strabismus or any other pathological changes of the eyeball or acute inflammatory ocular diseases;
- Subjects deemed inappropriate by the investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 401122, China
The Second People's Hospital of Foshan City
Foshan, Guangdong, 528000, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, China
Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
The Fourth People's Hospital of Shenyang City
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110032, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Guilin, Nanning, 530021, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710001, China
Related Publications (17)
He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Mar;45(3):793-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1051.
PMID: 14985292RESULTZhao J, Pan X, Sui R, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;129(4):427-35. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00452-3.
PMID: 10764849RESULTMaul E, Barroso S, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;129(4):445-54. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00454-7.
PMID: 10764851RESULTPokharel GP, Negrel AD, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. Refractive Error Study in Children: results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;129(4):436-44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00453-5.
PMID: 10764850RESULTMutti DO, Hayes JR, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Cotter SA, Kleinstein RN, Manny RE, Twelker JD, Zadnik K; CLEERE Study Group. Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun;48(6):2510-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0562.
PMID: 17525178RESULTZadnik K, Sinnott LT, Cotter SA, Jones-Jordan LA, Kleinstein RN, Manny RE, Twelker JD, Mutti DO; Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group. Prediction of Juvenile-Onset Myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;133(6):683-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0471.
PMID: 25837970RESULTZhang M, Gazzard G, Fu Z, Li L, Chen B, Saw SM, Congdon N. Validating the accuracy of a model to predict the onset of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jul 29;52(8):5836-41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5592.
PMID: 21330664RESULTJones-Jordan LA, Sinnott LT, Manny RE, Cotter SA, Kleinstein RN, Mutti DO, Twelker JD, Zadnik K; Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group. Early childhood refractive error and parental history of myopia as predictors of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jan;51(1):115-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3210. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
PMID: 19737876RESULTTedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, Eriksson N, Furlotte NA, Verhoeven VJM, Iglesias AI, Meester-Smoor MA, Tompson SW, Fan Q, Khawaja AP, Cheng CY, Hohn R, Yamashiro K, Wenocur A, Grazal C, Haller T, Metspalu A, Wedenoja J, Jonas JB, Wang YX, Xie J, Mitchell P, Foster PJ, Klein BEK, Klein R, Paterson AD, Hosseini SM, Shah RL, Williams C, Teo YY, Tham YC, Gupta P, Zhao W, Shi Y, Saw WY, Tai ES, Sim XL, Huffman JE, Polasek O, Hayward C, Bencic G, Rudan I, Wilson JF; CREAM Consortium; 23andMe Research Team; UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium; Joshi PK, Tsujikawa A, Matsuda F, Whisenhunt KN, Zeller T, van der Spek PJ, Haak R, Meijers-Heijboer H, van Leeuwen EM, Iyengar SK, Lass JH, Hofman A, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, Vingerling JR, Lehtimaki T, Raitakari OT, Biino G, Concas MP, Schwantes-An TH, Igo RP Jr, Cuellar-Partida G, Martin NG, Craig JE, Gharahkhani P, Williams KM, Nag A, Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Delcourt C, Bellenguez C, Ried JS, Bergen AA, Meitinger T, Gieger C, Wong TY, Hewitt AW, Mackey DA, Simpson CL, Pfeiffer N, Parssinen O, Baird PN, Vitart V, Amin N, van Duijn CM, Bailey-Wilson JE, Young TL, Saw SM, Stambolian D, MacGregor S, Guggenheim JA, Tung JY, Hammond CJ, Klaver CCW. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet. 2018 Jun;50(6):834-848. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0127-7. Epub 2018 May 28.
PMID: 29808027RESULTWang W, Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Zhang S, Xuan M, Chen Y, Xiong R, Bulloch G, Zeng J, Morgan IG, He M. Clinically Significant Axial Shortening in Myopic Children After Repeated Low-Level Red Light Therapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):999-1011. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00644-2. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
PMID: 36609829RESULTBoyer D, Hu A, Warrow D, Xavier S, Gonzalez V, Lad E, Rosen RB, Do D, Schneiderman T, Ho A, Munk MR, Jaffe G, Tedford SE, Croissant CL, Walker M, Ruckert R, Tedford CE. LIGHTSITE III: 13-Month Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation in Nonexudative (Dry) Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using the Lumithera Valeda Light Delivery System. Retina. 2024 Mar 1;44(3):487-497. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003980.
PMID: 37972955RESULTIvandic BT, Ivandic T. Low-level laser therapy improves visual acuity in adolescent and adult patients with amblyopia. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Mar;30(3):167-71. doi: 10.1089/pho.2011.3089. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
PMID: 22235969RESULTKaymak H, Munk MR, Tedford SE, Croissant CL, Tedford CE, Ruckert R, Schwahn H. Non-Invasive Treatment of Early Diabetic Macular Edema by Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation with the Valeda Light Delivery System. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 22;17:3549-3559. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S415883. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38026594RESULTAnders JJ, Lanzafame RJ, Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Apr;33(4):183-4. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.9848. No abstract available.
PMID: 25844681RESULTLinnik LA, Usov NI, Chechin PP, Pelepchuk OS. [Prospects for using stimulating laser therapy in ophthalmology]. Oftalmol Zh. 1982;37(4):193-7. No abstract available. Russian.
PMID: 7145299RESULTPosten W, Wrone DA, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Silapunt S, Alam M. Low-level laser therapy for wound healing: mechanism and efficacy. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Mar;31(3):334-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31086.
PMID: 15841638RESULTChung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Feb;40(2):516-33. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
PMID: 22045511RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Optometry Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2025
First Posted
January 9, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
January 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share