The Effect of Exoskeletal-assisted Walking Combined With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Bone Strength.
Exoskeletal-assisted Walking Combined With Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation: Effect on Imaging and Serum Biomarkers of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Bone Strength.
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Immobilization following spinal cord injury (SCI) results in muscle and bone loss below the level of injury, which ultimately predisposes to fracture at several sites throughout the legs and can lead to several medical complications that can devastate quality of life. There is a scarcity of research that has successfully implemented rehabilitation and/or exercise training interventions to preserve the musculoskeletal system during the acute phase SCI, or possibly reverse the muscle and bone loss that has already occurred in chronic SCI. This study will compare the effect of exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) training combined with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) (EAW + active tSCS), to that of EAW + sham tSCS, on measures of muscle and bone health in a cohort of chronically injured motor incomplete SCI. A successful outcome would expand treatment options to improve musculoskeletal health over the lifetime.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2026
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 8, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2033
January 8, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 years
December 18, 2025
January 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Muscle cross sectional area of the mid-thigh
EAW + active tSCS will increase muscle cross sectional area of the mid-thigh more than EAW + sham tSCS.
Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline) and again after 9 months of participating in the study interventions.
Other Outcomes (3)
Bone Strength at the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia
Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), after ~54 training sessions (4.5 months), with a final measurement completed after 9 months of the training interventions.
Muscle and Bone Serum and Plasma Biomarker Time-Course Response
Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), after ~54 training sessions (4.5 months), with a final measurement completed after 9 months of the training interventions.
Seated and Supine Electromyography (EMG) assessments of Muscle Activation
Obtained prior to starting the study at enrollment (baseline), after ~54 training sessions (4.5 months), with a final measurement completed after 9 months of the training interventions.
Study Arms (2)
Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking (EAW) + active Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)
EXPERIMENTALThe EAW + active tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral tSCS while simultaneously performing EAW.
Exoskeleton-assisted walking (EAW) + sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS)
SHAM COMPARATORThe EAW + sham tSCS group will receive simultaneous lumbosacral sham tSCS while simultaneously performing EAW. Participants in both groups will receive 60 minutes of EAW + sham tSCS overground training per session for a total of 108 sessions (3 X week for 36 weeks).
Interventions
The full electrical signal is delivered during lumbosacaral tSCS treatment while simultaneously performing EAW. Participants in both groups will receive 60 minutes of EAW + active tSCS overground training per session for a total of 108 sessions (3 X week for 36 weeks).
The lumbosacral tSCS electrical signal is set too low to have any biological effect while simultaneously performing EAW.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Medical history and exam to ensure medical health, anthropometric compatibility for EAW, and to identify fragility or traumatic fractures, unhealed fractures, and signs of swelling, bruising, and discoloration of the legs.
- Between the ages of 21-60 years old
- Non-walkers with an SCI greater than 3 years post injury.
- As measured by a member of the study staff, participants who have a lower extremity motor score greater or equal to 16 on the INSCSCI exam with an impairment grade of C or D.
- Neurologic level of injury as determined by study staff between C5-T10 (completed at participant's screening).
- Capable of gripping Lofstrand crutches and/or a walker without assistance.
- Wheelchair reliant 100% of the time.
- Height is between 62 inches and 74 inches.
- Weight less than 220lbs.
- Anthropometric compatibility with the EAW device:
- Thigh length between 14 and 19 in (36 and 48 cm).
- Shank length between 17 and 22 in (43 and 55 cm).
- As determined by the study physician from the screening health exam, a history of fragility or traumatic fractures, unhealed fractures, and signs of swelling, bruising, and discoloration of the legs.
- Current bone disease diagnosis (e.g., osteomyelitis, hyperparathyroidism)
- As determined by the study physician from the screening DXA study, a T-score at the total hip \< -3.5 or aBMD of the knee (proximal tibia and/or distal femur) \< 0.60 g/cm2 from the DXA screen
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bronx VA Medical Centerlead
- Kessler Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
Related Publications (6)
Totosy de Zepetnek JO, Craven BC, Giangregorio LM. An evaluation of the muscle-bone unit theory among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012 Feb;50(2):147-52. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.99. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
PMID: 21894164RESULTSamejima S, Caskey CD, Inanici F, Shrivastav SR, Brighton LN, Pradarelli J, Martinez V, Steele KM, Saigal R, Moritz CT. Multisite Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation for Walking and Autonomic Recovery in Motor-Incomplete Tetraplegia: A Single-Subject Design. Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;102(1):pzab228. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab228.
PMID: 35076067RESULTGerasimenko Y, Gorodnichev R, Moshonkina T, Sayenko D, Gad P, Reggie Edgerton V. Transcutaneous electrical spinal-cord stimulation in humans. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
PMID: 26205686RESULTGerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 15;32(24):1968-80. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4008. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
PMID: 26077679RESULTKarelis AD, Carvalho LP, Castillo MJ, Gagnon DH, Aubertin-Leheudre M. Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2017 Jan 19;49(1):84-87. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2173.
PMID: 27973679RESULTShackleton C, Evans R, West S, Derman W, Albertus Y. Robotic Walking to Mitigate Bone Mineral Density Decline and Adverse Body Composition in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct 1;101(10):931-936. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001937. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
PMID: 34864766RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christopher P Cardozo, M.D.
James J. Peters VA Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigator, Research Health Science Specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2025
First Posted
January 8, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2033
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
At this time, the investigators must declare that IPD will not be shared with other investigators, as the VA has not approved a plan and is currently not in place at our VA research laboratory. The investigators anticipate a policy will be approved over the next 24 months to share IPD with other investigators. Once an approved plan is in place, it will be added to the study protocol and the PRS site for this trial.