A Clinical Effectiveness Study of Total Laparoscopic Subcutaneous Gland Resection Combined With Nipple-Areola Complex Lift in the Management of Moderate to Severe Gynecomastia in Males
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate and compare the treatment outcomes of total laparoscopic subcutaneous gland resection combined with nipple-areola complex (NAC) lift surgery against those of isolated laparoscopic surgery in the management of moderate to severe gynecomastia (GYN) in males.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2027
January 2, 2026
November 1, 2025
5.3 years
December 17, 2025
December 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Differences in the clinical index between the two groups
The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery in conjunction with NAC lift group,isolated laparoscopic surgery group. IBM SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The analysis attempt to reveal the differences between the two groups in terms of surgical time, blood loss, and drainage tube placement duration
Baseline
Difference in the pre- and postoperative convexity of breast between the two groups
The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery in conjunction with NAC lift group,isolated laparoscopic surgery group. IBM SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The analysis attempt to reveal the differences between the two groups in terms of the pre- and postoperative convexity of breast
Baseline
Difference in the recovery rate of skin flatness between the two groups
The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery in conjunction with NAC lift group,isolated laparoscopic surgery group. IBM SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The analysis attempt to reveal the differences of the recovery rate of skin flatness between the group undergoing laparoscopic surgery combined with NAC lift and he group undergoing simple laparoscopic surgery at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Baseline
Difference in the positioning of the NAC between the two groups
The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery in conjunction with NAC lift group,isolated laparoscopic surgery group. IBM SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The analysis attempt to reveal the differences between the two groups in terms of the positioning of the NAC
Baseline
Differences in the postoperative patient satisfaction between the two groups
The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery in conjunction with NAC lift group,isolated laparoscopic surgery group. IBM SPSS 27.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The analysis attempt to reveal the differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative patient satisfaction
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Differences in the postoperative complications between the two groups
baseline
Study Arms (2)
experimental group
the group undergoing laparoscopic surgery combined with NAC lift
control group
the group undergoing simple laparoscopic surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with moderate to severe GYN conditions who were treated at the Breast Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were included.
You may qualify if:
- (1) Those with bilateral breast development confirmed by preoperative ultrasound examination; (2) For bilateral developed breasts, the preoperative classification according to Simon's system (hereinafter referred to as Simon classification) is all at grade IIA or above.
You may not qualify if:
- (1) Benign and malignant tumors of the male breast; (2) Other diseases such as testicular tumors, congenital testicular dysplasia syndrome, hyperthyroidism, liver cirrhosis, primary gonadal hypofunction and oral medications can lead to secondary male breast development; (3) Patients with severe primary diseases such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, liver and kidney diseases, and coagulation disorders are not suitable for anesthesia and surgery; (4) Patients with incomplete clinical case data.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First affiliated hospital of Harbin medical university
Harbin, Heilongjing, 150001, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2025
First Posted
January 2, 2026
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share