Treatment of Mild and Moderate Cases of Gynaecomastia
Comparison Between Liposuction and Peri-areolar Surgical Excision in Mild and Moderate Cases of Gynaecomastia
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare liposuction and periareolar surgical excision in mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia as regard cosmosis, complications, patient satisfaction, operation time, and hospital stay. This study will be carried out on patients with gynecomastia presented to the Plastic Surgery Department, Sohag University, in the period between January 2021 to January 2022 as a retrospective and prospective study. Patients will be divided into 2 groups: group A treated with suction-assisted liposuction. group B treated with peri-areolar surgical excision. Each group contains 20 patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 19, 2021
July 1, 2021
1 year
July 13, 2021
July 13, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between group A and B in aesthetic satisfaction
A 100 -point visual analogue scale (VAS) for the assessment of aesthetic satisfaction with 0 as the worst cosmosis and 100 as the best aesthetic result With filled standardized charts.
difference between group A and B in aesthetic results according to visual analogue scale at 3 month post-operative
Study Arms (2)
liposuction
ACTIVE COMPARATORgroup A will be treated with liposuction
periareolar surgical excision
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B will be treated with periareolar surgical excision
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- The age of patients ranges from 18-60yrs. Mild and moderate cases of gynecomastia.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with endocrine causes. Patients with genetic causes. Severe cases of gynecomastia. Patients who refused surgical intervention. Patients who are not fit for surgery. Patients with chronic illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag University
Sohag, 82525, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gamal Y Elsaied, MD
sohag univeristy hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2021
First Posted
July 19, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
February 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share