Intervention With Alternative Sports for Physical and Mental Improvement in Primary School Children
Renew
Effectiveness of an Intervention Programme Using Alternative Sports for the Recovery of Motor Learning and the Improvement of Physical and Mental Health in Primary School Students.
1 other identifier
interventional
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical trial is to determine whether a school-based intervention involving alternative sports can improve physical fitness, motor skills, and psychological well-being in elementary school students. The main question to be answered is: Can participating in a physical intervention involving alternative sports help children improve their strength, speed, endurance, motor skills, and enjoyment of physical activity? For 8 weeks, during physical education classes, researchers will compare an intervention with alternative sports (korfball, flag football, kin-ball, and ultimate frisbee) with the usual classes that students receive according to their study program, to see if alternative sports improve physical and psychological aspects. Participants must:
- Perform physical and motor tests to determine their initial physical condition
- Complete a questionnaire to determine their level of enjoyment during physical activity.
- Actively participate in an 8-week intervention during physical education classes.
- Monitor their level of physical activity during classes using a device (accelerometer).
- Authorize the use of their first semester grades.
- At the end of the intervention, physical and motor tests will be performed again to assess progress and physical changes. For eight weeks, researchers will conduct a study in physical education classes to compare two types of teaching: one based on alternative sports (such as korfball, flag football, kin-ball, and ultimate frisbee) and another with traditional school program classes to see if children improve physically and psychologically.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2026
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 months
December 3, 2025
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Motor competence
It will be assessed using the Motorishe Basiskompetenzen (MOBAK) battery, which evaluates body control (balance, rolling, jumping) and object control (throwing, catching, bouncing, dribbling), used in schoolchildren aged 10 to 12. For throwing and catching tasks, children have 6 attempts (no trial attempts), in which the number of successes, i.e., successful attempts, is recorded. These are then scored: 0 to 2 successes, 0 points; 3 to 4 successes, 1 point; and 5 to 6 successes, 2 points. For the tasks of driving with the hand, driving with the foot, balancing, rolling, jumping, and running. Children have 2 attempts to complete the task (no trial attempts). The scoring of these tests is based on a dichotomous scale (0 = not achieved, 1 = achieved), in which the number of successful attempts is recorded (never achieved = 0 points; achieved once = 1 point; achieved twice = 2 points). The score from 0 to 8 determines the level of basic motor skills in a differentiated manner.
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Cardiorespiratory capacity
Cardiorespiratory capacity will be assessed, using tests that have been widely validated in school populations: For cardiorespiratory capacity, a 6-minute walk test will be used to estimate VO₂max.
A measurement will be taken at the start of the intervention on day 1 (pre-test) and another assessment will be carried out at the end of the intervention on day 16 (post-test).
Muscle strength (Lower Limb )
Lower limb muscle strength will be assessed using tests that have been widely validated in school populations: the Bosco Test (squat jump (SJ) and counter-movement jump (CMJ) on a force platform.
A measurement will be taken at the start of the intervention on day 1 (pre-test) and another assessment will be carried out at the end of the intervention on day 16 (post-test).
Muscle Strength (Upper Limb)
Grip strength will be assessed using a Camry EH101 hydraulic dynamometer, which is known for its high accuracy.
A measurement will be taken at the start of the intervention, on Day 1 (pre-test), and another assessment will be conducted at the end of the intervention, on Day 16 (post-test).
Enjoyment
Enjoyment of physical activity was assessed using the Spanish version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). This scale consists of 16 items. Responses were collected on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree). The score is obtained by calculating the average of the 16 items. The total score ranges from 16 to 80, with higher values indicating greater enjoyment.
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Body Composition (Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test)
Morphological variables (Body Height)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Morphological variables (Body Weight)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Morphological variables (Body Mass Index)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Morphological variables (Waist Circumference)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Sociodemographic Characteristics (Covariates)
It will be evaluated on day 1 (pre-test) and day 16 (post-test).
Study Arms (2)
Intervention with alternative sports
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will hold 90-minute sessions twice a week for two months. Each two-week block will be dedicated to an alternative sport (flag football, ultimate frisbee, korfball, and kin-ball).
Control Group, traditional classes.
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group (CG) will only participate in the initial and final evaluations, continuing with their traditional physical education classes without modifications, distributed in two weekly sessions of 90 minutes each. The classes incorporate sports and motor activities that involve collaborative sports and games.
Interventions
The RENUÉVATE intervention will be implemented by previously trained physical education teachers. It will last for two months, with sessions held twice a week. The sessions will take place during the school day, in physical education classes, and will last 90 minutes. Each two-week block will be dedicated to an alternative team sport (flag football, ultimate frisbee, korfball, and kin-ball). The physical load for each session is as follows: Warm-up (15 min): general mobility and specific exercises to prepare for the sport in question, maintaining an intensity of 50-60% HRmax; RPE 9-11. Main part (65 min): practice of the alternative sport through games and technical/tactical progressions. An intensity of 65-80% HRmax will be prescribed; RPE 12-15, with active breaks between tasks. Cool down (10 min): relaxation, stretching, and group reflection activities with a light intensity \<50% HRmax; RPE ≤ 9.
The intervention will be implemented by physical education teachers who have been trained in the project's objectives, methodology, and values. The training will include a standardized manual and a two-hour weekly practical session to ensure fidelity in the program's implementation. In addition, weekly monitoring meetings will be held with the research team to resolve questions and ensure consistency across schools.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be enrolled in the assigned school.
- Have no motor problems that prevent participation in the physical activities proposed for the development of alternative sports.
You may not qualify if:
- Not having taken the initial or final tests.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Católica del Maule
Talca, Maule Region, 3460000, Chile
Related Publications (15)
Zurita-Ortega, F., Ubago-Jiménez, J. L., Ibáñez, E. M., González-Valero, G., & Alonso Vargas, J. M. Effects of a physical education programme based on kin ball on body mass index and basic physical skills in students with down syndrome. (2025). https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v20i63.2211
RESULTVaquero-Solís, M., Tapia-Serrano, M. A., Moreno-Díaz, M. I., Cerro-Herrero, D., & Sánchez-Miguel, P. A. Exploratory analysis of physical activity in self-objectification and body image of adolescents. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, (2021). 16(48), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.12800/CCD.V16I48.1724
RESULTStewart, A., Marfell-Jones, M., Olds, T., & de Ridder, J. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. (2011). ISAK.
RESULTMuñoz Troncoso, F., Becerra Peña, S., & Riquelme, E. Elaboración y validación psicométrica del cuestionario de convivencia escolar para la no violencia (CENVI). Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), (2017). 43(3), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000300012
RESULTMoya-Mata, I., Ruiz-Sanchis, L., Martín-Ruiz, J., & Ros-Ros, C. Physical activity represented in physical education textbooks for elementary education. Movimento, (2019). 25(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.89296
RESULTMorales-Campo PT, Perez-Munoz S, Lopez-Garcia S, Diez-Fernandez P, Rodriguez-Cayetano A. New alternative proposal in physical education: Touchtennis as a racket sport in schools. Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Mar 3;7:1545994. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1545994. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40098917RESULTMigueles, J. H., Rowlands, A. V., Huber, F., Sabia, S., & Van Hees, V. T. GGIR: A Research Community-Driven Open Source R Package for Generating Physical Activity and Sleep Outcomes From Multi-Day Raw Accelerometer Data. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour, 2019. 2(3), 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2018-0063
RESULTMartins S, Augusto C, Martins MRO, Jose Silva M, Okan O, Dadaczynski K, Duarte A, Fronteira I, Ramos N, Rosario R. Adaptation and validation of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Portuguese university students. Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Oct;33 Suppl 1:390-398. doi: 10.1002/hpja.580. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
PMID: 35124876RESULTMarkovic J, Bubanj S, Sekeljic G, Pavlovic S, Radenkovic M, Stankovic D, Petkovic E, Aksovic N, Radenkovic O, Preljevic A, Bjelica B, Petrovic V, Sinanovic S, Tomovic M. Efficiency of an Alternative Physical Education Program for the Lower Grades of Elementary School Children. Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 6;10(10):1657. doi: 10.3390/children10101657.
PMID: 37892320RESULTMarfell-Jones, M. J., Stewart, A., & de Ridder, J. H. International standards for anthropometric assessment. (2012). International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
RESULTLeuschner M, Grauduszus M, Friesen D, Ferrari N, Klaudius M, Joisten C. The 6-minute Run Test: Validation and Reference Equations for Adults. Int J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;45(3):222-230. doi: 10.1055/a-2206-5291. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
PMID: 38113901RESULTLettink A, Altenburg TM, Arts J, van Hees VT, Chinapaw MJM. Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 8;19(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01296-y.
PMID: 36076221RESULTHerrmann, C. MOBAK 1-4. Test zur Erfassung Motorischer Basiskompetenzen für die Klassen 1-4 (2018). Hogrefe.
RESULTChen C, Weyland S, Fritsch J, Woll A, Niessner C, Burchartz A, Schmidt SCE, Jekauc D. A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111035.
PMID: 34769552RESULTBudler LC, Pajnkihar M, Ravens-Sieberer U, Barr O, Stiglic G. The KIDSCREEN-27 scale: translation and validation study of the Slovenian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Apr 21;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01973-3.
PMID: 35448993RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eugenio N Merellano Navarro, Doctor
Universidad Católica del Maule
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Physical Activity Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Posted
December 31, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 12, 2026
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Individual patient data will be available from July 2026 to December 2026.
- Access Criteria
- * The criteria that must be met for data to be shared. * The study design must be experimental, using a controlled trial. * The intervention group must be between 10 and 12 years old. * Statistical methods will be analyzed using mixed linear models, considering the fixed effect of the group (GI vs. GC), baseline, age, and sex, and including a random effect by school cluster to adjust for intraclass correlation. * The mechanism for sharing data is to submit a written request by email, indicating the reasons for the data request, providing a summary of the project, and disclosing the statistical analysis to be performed. * Once the document has been reviewed and approved by the principal investigator, a data exchange agreement will be signed.
Yes, inpatient data will be shared, specifically the data supporting the results of the publication. Study participants will be assigned a code, and that data will be shared.