Treatment Durations for Endodontic Procedures
Comparison of Treatment Durations for Endodontic Procedures on Maxillary Molar Teeth Using Different Magnification Techniques
1 other identifier
observational
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this observational study is to compare the treatment durations of different stages of routine root canal therapy performed on maxillary molar teeth using direct vision, magnification loupes, and a dental operating microscope. The primary question the study seeks to answer is whether there is a significant difference in the duration of endodontic procedures performed under different magnification techniques. Patients indicated for root canal treatment in their maxillary first molar teeth will receive standard root canal therapy in accordance with routine clinical protocols. The duration of each procedural step will be recorded and subsequently compared among the three magnification methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2025
CompletedDecember 26, 2025
November 1, 2025
9 months
November 26, 2025
December 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of each procedural step in endodontic treatment
The duration (in seconds) of each of seven key procedural stages performed during routine root canal treatment on maxillary first molar teeth: 1. Access cavity preparation 2. Working length determination 3. Canal shaping 4. MB2 canal detection and shaping 5. Final irrigation and passive ultrasonic activation 6. Root canal filling 7. Coronal restoration Each stage was timed separately for three groups (direct vision, dental loupes, and dental operating microscope) to compare the effect of different magnification techniques on working efficiency.
From the start of access cavity preparation to the completion of coronal restoration during a single treatment visit (approximately 35-120 minutes).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Presence of MB2 canal according to magnification technique
Baseline (at the time of canal orifice identification)
Study Arms (3)
Patients treated under direct vision
Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed without magnification, using direct visual inspection only.
Patients treated using dental loupes
Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using 5× magnification dental loupes.
Patients treated using a dental operating microscope
Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using a dental operating microscope at 8×-16× magnification.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted to the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uşak University, who required root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth
You may qualify if:
- Patients requiring root canal treatment of the maxillary first molar tooth
You may not qualify if:
- Previous root canal treatment on the maxillary first molar tooth
- Presence of fracture or crack in the maxillary first molar tooth
- Lack of indication for completing treatment in a single session
- Patient refusal to continue treatment during the procedure
- Indication for extraction due to complications during treatment
- Teeth indicated for fiber post restoration due to excessive material loss
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uşak Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Uşak, 64000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002 Apr;28(4):324-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200204000-00016.
PMID: 12043874BACKGROUNDWong AW, Zhu X, Zhang S, Li SK, Zhang C, Chu CH. Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe. BMC Oral Health. 2015 Mar 20;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0025-7.
PMID: 25887978BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oğuz Tavşan, Assistant Professor
Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tuğçe N Çağlar, Research Assistant
Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 1 Month
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2025
First Posted
December 26, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
December 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data collected in this study will not be shared with other researchers. Data will be used only for academic purposes within the scope of the thesis and institutional ethics approval.