NCT07304869

Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to compare the treatment durations of different stages of routine root canal therapy performed on maxillary molar teeth using direct vision, magnification loupes, and a dental operating microscope. The primary question the study seeks to answer is whether there is a significant difference in the duration of endodontic procedures performed under different magnification techniques. Patients indicated for root canal treatment in their maxillary first molar teeth will receive standard root canal therapy in accordance with routine clinical protocols. The duration of each procedural step will be recorded and subsequently compared among the three magnification methods.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

root canal treatmentDental operating microscopedental loupeschair timesecond mesiobuccal canal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of each procedural step in endodontic treatment

    The duration (in seconds) of each of seven key procedural stages performed during routine root canal treatment on maxillary first molar teeth: 1. Access cavity preparation 2. Working length determination 3. Canal shaping 4. MB2 canal detection and shaping 5. Final irrigation and passive ultrasonic activation 6. Root canal filling 7. Coronal restoration Each stage was timed separately for three groups (direct vision, dental loupes, and dental operating microscope) to compare the effect of different magnification techniques on working efficiency.

    From the start of access cavity preparation to the completion of coronal restoration during a single treatment visit (approximately 35-120 minutes).

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Presence of MB2 canal according to magnification technique

    Baseline (at the time of canal orifice identification)

Study Arms (3)

Patients treated under direct vision

Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed without magnification, using direct visual inspection only.

Patients treated using dental loupes

Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using 5× magnification dental loupes.

Patients treated using a dental operating microscope

Root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth performed using a dental operating microscope at 8×-16× magnification.

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients admitted to the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uşak University, who required root canal treatment of maxillary first molar teeth

You may qualify if:

  • Patients requiring root canal treatment of the maxillary first molar tooth

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous root canal treatment on the maxillary first molar tooth
  • Presence of fracture or crack in the maxillary first molar tooth
  • Lack of indication for completing treatment in a single session
  • Patient refusal to continue treatment during the procedure
  • Indication for extraction due to complications during treatment
  • Teeth indicated for fiber post restoration due to excessive material loss

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

Uşak, 64000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002 Apr;28(4):324-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200204000-00016.

    PMID: 12043874BACKGROUND
  • Wong AW, Zhu X, Zhang S, Li SK, Zhang C, Chu CH. Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe. BMC Oral Health. 2015 Mar 20;15:40. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0025-7.

    PMID: 25887978BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Oğuz Tavşan, Assistant Professor

    Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tuğçe N Çağlar, Research Assistant

    Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Month
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Posted

December 26, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

October 31, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The individual participant data collected in this study will not be shared with other researchers. Data will be used only for academic purposes within the scope of the thesis and institutional ethics approval.

Locations