NCT07304310

Brief Summary

Orthodontic clean-up following debonding remains a technically demanding procedure, with documented risks of enamel roughening, microdefects, discoloration, and increased plaque retention. Minimally invasive technologies have recently been introduced to improve adhesive removal while limiting damage to the outer enamel layer, but comparative clinical evidence remains limited. This aim of this case-control study was to compare the effectiveness and the safety of two different minimally invasive clean-up systems: two-step ultrasonic inserts (Combi Touch, Mectron) and a one-step polishing bur (One Gloss®, Shofu). A total of 142 patients presenting residual orthodontic adhesive after debonding were included. They were randomly allocated to: (1) Case group (n = 71): two-step ultrasonic system (Combi Touch, Mectron) equipped with 30-µm diamond-coated and PEEK-coated inserts; (2) Control group (n= 71): one-step tungsten carbide/abrasive polisher (One Gloss®, Shofu). For each patient the following clinical indices were recorded at baseline (T0) and 30-day follow-up (T1): Plaque Control Record (PCR), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI), International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II), and dentinal sensitivity (Schiff Air Index). Orthodontic treatment modality (clear aligners vs fixed appliances) was documented as a covariate and tested for potential interactions with clinical outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
142

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 8, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2025

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

orthodontic clean-uporthodontic debondingenamel preservationminimally invasive dentistrycase-control study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Plaque Control Record (PCR)

    The PCR is scored as the percentage of tooth surfaces with visible plaque (0-100%). Higher scores indicate worse oral hygiene.

    Baseline, after 30 days

  • Bleeding on Probing (BoP)

    BoP is expressed as the percentage of bleeding sites (0-100%). Higher scores indicate worse gingival health.

    Baseline, after 30 days

  • Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI)

    The ARI is scored 0-3, where 0 = no adhesive left on tooth surface and 3 = all adhesive remaining. Higher scores indicate more adhesive remaining on the enamel.

    Baseline, after 30 days

  • International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II)

    The ICDAS-II is scored from 0 to 6, where 0 = sound tooth surface and 6 = extensive cavitated lesion. Higher scores indicate worse caries status.

    Baseline, after 30 days

  • Schiff Air Index

    The Schiff Air Index scored from 0 to 3, where 0 = no response to air stimulus and 3 = strong painful response. Higher scores indicate greater dentinal hypersensitivity.

    Baseline, after 30 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Orthodontic treatment modality

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Case group

Patients underwent orthodontic clean-up with a two-step ultrasonic system (Combi Touch, Mectron) equipped with 30-µm diamond-coated and PEEK-coated inserts

Device: Two-step ultrasonic protocol

Control group

Patients underwent orthodontic clean-up with a one-step tungsten carbide/abrasive polisher (One Gloss®, Shofu)

Device: One-step clean-up protocol

Interventions

Diamond- and PEEK-coated inserts

Case group

One-step tungsten carbide/abrasive polisher

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population consisted of 142 consecutive patients requiring adhesive removal following orthodontic debonding. Participants were recruited at the Oral Hygiene and Prevention Center of the Department of Dentistry, San Raffaele Hospital, and at the Smart Dental Clinics (San Donato Group), Milan, Italy, between April 2025 and September 2025.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergone either fixed vestibular orthodontic treatment or clear aligner therapy
  • Debonding procedure must not have occurred more than 24 months prior to evaluation
  • ICDAS-II index ≤ 2

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients treated with removable orthodontic appliances
  • Patients whose debonding exceeded 24 months
  • ICDAS-II score \> 2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dental Clinic, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital

Milan, Italy, 20132, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Pont HB, Ozcan M, Bagis B, Ren Y. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Oct;138(4):387.e1-387.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028.

    PMID: 20889035BACKGROUND
  • D'Amario M, Bernardi S, Di Lauro D, Marzo G, Macchiarelli G, Capogreco M. Debonding and Clean-Up in Orthodontics: Evaluation of Different Techniques and Micro-Morphological Aspects of the Enamel Surface. Dent J (Basel). 2020 Jun 17;8(2):58. doi: 10.3390/dj8020058.

    PMID: 32560482BACKGROUND
  • Thawaba AA, Albelasy NF, Elsherbini AM, Hafez AM. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03194-6.

    PMID: 37443027BACKGROUND
  • Campbell PM. Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(2):103-10. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)0652.0.CO;2.

    PMID: 7785800BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2025

First Posted

December 26, 2025

Study Start

April 8, 2025

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations