Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Teaching Methods in Oral Hygiene in Adolescent Orthodontic Patients
MAHO
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthodontic appliances have been shown to interfere with oral hygiene maneuvers by providing many additional sites for formation and retention of biofilm. Its accumulation is responsible for undesirable effects such as decays and periodontal pathologies. These lower the benefit / risk ratio of orthodontic treatments. In addition, their management is not negligible at the macroeconomic level. As such, it is more than necessary for the orthodontist to teach oral hygiene methods adapted to each of his patients fitted to limit the risk of appearance of biofilm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 29, 2025
CompletedJanuary 18, 2023
January 1, 2023
3 years
May 12, 2020
January 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the effectiveness of 3 methods of teaching oral hygiene in terms of controlling biofilm formation: MOP (Modified Orthodnotic Plaque Index) classification
The average plaque index at six months after inclusion according to the MOP (Modified Orthodnotic Plaque Index) classification. It is evaluated on macro photography in a standardized manner by a blind examiner of the patient's randomization arm. The values range from 0 to 4 for each tooth, which makes an average score of 0 to 48 for the maxillary arch. 0 is the absence of plaque while 48 is an abundance of plaque on all teeth, the worst situation. The score is expressed in absolute value without unit.
6 months of intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Compare the effectiveness of three teaching methods in oral hygiene for the control of gum inflammation: gingival index at six months after inclusion according to the Loë and Silness scale
6 months after bonding the device.
Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: MOP classification plate index
J0 (during the installation of the device)
Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: gingival index according to the Loë and Silness scale
J0 (during the installation of the device)
Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: MOP classification plate index
at 1½ months after installation of the device
Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: gingival index according to the Loë and Silness scale
at 1½ months after installation of the device
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral hygiene advice given orally
Group with active participation
ACTIVE COMPARATORoral hygiene advice given orally and demonstration of brushing methods in the sink with active participation
Group with video and quizz
EXPERIMENTALoral hygiene advice given orally and an additional appointment between the device bonding appointment and the first check-up. This is a 15-minute session dedicated to teaching oral hygiene. This session will include watching of an educational video followed by a quiz, as well as the application of the methods taught in the sink (using plate developer and the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head).
Interventions
oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment.
oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment with a demonstration of brushing methods in the sink with active participation (use of plate developer and then the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head) during the bonding appointment as well than at each check-up appointment.
oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment with have an additional appointment between the device bonding appointment and the first check-up. This is a 15-minute session dedicated to teaching oral hygiene. This session will include watching of an educational video followed by a quiz, as well as the application of the methods taught in the sink (using plate developer and the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 11 to 17 \* years;
- Patient with stable adolescent teeth, young adult or adult teeth;
- Requiring a fixed orthodontic treatment without extraction (other than wisdom teeth) at least to the maxillary arch;
- Affiliated, himself or through his parents to a social security scheme;
- Having received information on the protocol and having given free, informed and written consent.
- Whose holders of parental authority have received information on the protocol and have given free, informed and written consent.
- Aged under 18 at the end of the 6 months of participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with periodontal disease or progressive carious lesions;
- Patient with a prosthetic crown or composite restoration on the central and / or lateral maxillary incisor;
- Patient with systemic disease, major syndrome or cleft palate;
- Patient with an abnormal dental structure (eg fluorosis, MIH, imperfect amelogenesis, etc.);
- Patients taking long-term medication influencing periodontal health (corticosteroids, anti-epileptics, etc.);
- Patient with a physical or mental handicap preventing him from carrying out oral hygiene maneuvers independently;
- Patient refusing to use the products and instruments prescribed for the study;
- Patients with dental agenesis;
- Patients with poor command of the French language
- Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision or subject to a legal protection measure;
- Pregnant patient;
- Smoking patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de RENNES
Rennes, France
Related Publications (1)
Le Fouler A, Jeanne S, Sorel O, Brezulier D. How effective are three methods of teaching oral hygiene for adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment? The MAHO protocol: an RCT comparing visual, auditory and kinesthetic methods. Trials. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05093-z.
PMID: 33588930DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Damien BREZULIER, Dr
Rennes University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The plaque index readings, i.e. the taking of 3 macrophotographic shots (with reflex camera, allowing the MOP plaque index to be assessed in a second step), and the clinical index of gingival inflammation will be performed at each appointment (except during the dedicated session of group 3) by an examiner who will be blind from the group belonging to each patient
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2020
First Posted
June 23, 2020
Study Start
January 29, 2022
Primary Completion
January 29, 2025
Study Completion
January 29, 2025
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share