NCT04444154

Brief Summary

Orthodontic appliances have been shown to interfere with oral hygiene maneuvers by providing many additional sites for formation and retention of biofilm. Its accumulation is responsible for undesirable effects such as decays and periodontal pathologies. These lower the benefit / risk ratio of orthodontic treatments. In addition, their management is not negligible at the macroeconomic level. As such, it is more than necessary for the orthodontist to teach oral hygiene methods adapted to each of his patients fitted to limit the risk of appearance of biofilm.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2020

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 29, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 29, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 29, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 17, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

orthodontic applianceoral hygienemodified orthodontic plaque indexLoë and Silness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the effectiveness of 3 methods of teaching oral hygiene in terms of controlling biofilm formation: MOP (Modified Orthodnotic Plaque Index) classification

    The average plaque index at six months after inclusion according to the MOP (Modified Orthodnotic Plaque Index) classification. It is evaluated on macro photography in a standardized manner by a blind examiner of the patient's randomization arm. The values range from 0 to 4 for each tooth, which makes an average score of 0 to 48 for the maxillary arch. 0 is the absence of plaque while 48 is an abundance of plaque on all teeth, the worst situation. The score is expressed in absolute value without unit.

    6 months of intervention

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Compare the effectiveness of three teaching methods in oral hygiene for the control of gum inflammation: gingival index at six months after inclusion according to the Loë and Silness scale

    6 months after bonding the device.

  • Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: MOP classification plate index

    J0 (during the installation of the device)

  • Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: gingival index according to the Loë and Silness scale

    J0 (during the installation of the device)

  • Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: MOP classification plate index

    at 1½ months after installation of the device

  • Compare the effectiveness of three methods of teaching oral hygiene over time: gingival index according to the Loë and Silness scale

    at 1½ months after installation of the device

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oral hygiene advice given orally

Behavioral: Control group

Group with active participation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

oral hygiene advice given orally and demonstration of brushing methods in the sink with active participation

Behavioral: Group with active participation

Group with video and quizz

EXPERIMENTAL

oral hygiene advice given orally and an additional appointment between the device bonding appointment and the first check-up. This is a 15-minute session dedicated to teaching oral hygiene. This session will include watching of an educational video followed by a quiz, as well as the application of the methods taught in the sink (using plate developer and the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head).

Behavioral: Group with video and quizz

Interventions

Control groupBEHAVIORAL

oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment.

Control group

oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment with a demonstration of brushing methods in the sink with active participation (use of plate developer and then the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head) during the bonding appointment as well than at each check-up appointment.

Group with active participation

oral hygiene advice given orally in the chair during the bonding appointment and at each check-up appointment with have an additional appointment between the device bonding appointment and the first check-up. This is a 15-minute session dedicated to teaching oral hygiene. This session will include watching of an educational video followed by a quiz, as well as the application of the methods taught in the sink (using plate developer and the Oral B electric toothbrush with special orthodontic head).

Group with video and quizz

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient aged 11 to 17 \* years;
  • Patient with stable adolescent teeth, young adult or adult teeth;
  • Requiring a fixed orthodontic treatment without extraction (other than wisdom teeth) at least to the maxillary arch;
  • Affiliated, himself or through his parents to a social security scheme;
  • Having received information on the protocol and having given free, informed and written consent.
  • Whose holders of parental authority have received information on the protocol and have given free, informed and written consent.
  • Aged under 18 at the end of the 6 months of participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with periodontal disease or progressive carious lesions;
  • Patient with a prosthetic crown or composite restoration on the central and / or lateral maxillary incisor;
  • Patient with systemic disease, major syndrome or cleft palate;
  • Patient with an abnormal dental structure (eg fluorosis, MIH, imperfect amelogenesis, etc.);
  • Patients taking long-term medication influencing periodontal health (corticosteroids, anti-epileptics, etc.);
  • Patient with a physical or mental handicap preventing him from carrying out oral hygiene maneuvers independently;
  • Patient refusing to use the products and instruments prescribed for the study;
  • Patients with dental agenesis;
  • Patients with poor command of the French language
  • Patient deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision or subject to a legal protection measure;
  • Pregnant patient;
  • Smoking patient.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de RENNES

Rennes, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Le Fouler A, Jeanne S, Sorel O, Brezulier D. How effective are three methods of teaching oral hygiene for adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment? The MAHO protocol: an RCT comparing visual, auditory and kinesthetic methods. Trials. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05093-z.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Control GroupsPopulation GroupsVideotape Recording

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethodsDemographyPopulation CharacteristicsTape RecordingAudiovisual AidsEducational TechnologyTechnologyTechnology, Industry, and AgricultureTelevision

Study Officials

  • Damien BREZULIER, Dr

    Rennes University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The plaque index readings, i.e. the taking of 3 macrophotographic shots (with reflex camera, allowing the MOP plaque index to be assessed in a second step), and the clinical index of gingival inflammation will be performed at each appointment (except during the dedicated session of group 3) by an examiner who will be blind from the group belonging to each patient
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, monocentric, controlled, randomized study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Posted

June 23, 2020

Study Start

January 29, 2022

Primary Completion

January 29, 2025

Study Completion

January 29, 2025

Last Updated

January 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations