The Effects of Three Different Anesthetic Methods on Postoperative Agitation
Comparison of the Effects of Three Different Anesthetic Methods on Postoperative Agitation in Septoplasty Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adult patients undergoing septoplasty surgery will be evaluated in this study. The three different anesthesia methods used will be examined for psotoperative agitation: Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), Combined anesthesia with sevoflurane and intravenous agents (sevoflurane-CIVIA), Balanced inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Recovery patterns is extubation time, eye opening time, emergence agitation, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative recovery unit discharge time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2026
CompletedApril 30, 2026
January 1, 2026
2 months
December 1, 2025
April 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Emergence agitation
Emergence agitation will be assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). RASS is a 10-point scale ranging from +4 to -5, measures agitation, sedation level, and responsiveness.
Immediately after tracheal extubation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Immediately post-op, 15 minutes, and 30 minutes in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Extubation time
Immediately postoperative period
Recovery time
Continuous observation for 30 minutes in the PACU.
Study Arms (3)
Group S (Sevoflurane)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter entering the patient's demographic data (height, gender, weight, and age), the initial target concentration (Ce) at the site of action for propofol will be recorded as 4 µg/mL in the Eleveld model (MedCaptain Eleveld HP TCI Infusion Syringe Pump), and the target concentration (Ce) for remifentanil will be recorded as 4 ng/mL in the Minto model. Ventilation will be performed with a face mask using 100% O2 after loss of consciousness and disappearance of the eyelash reflex. When the BIS value drops below 60, measurement of the degree of neuromuscular blockade (TOFWatch S monitor; Organon, Dublin, Ireland) will be initiated. Rocuronium will be administered as a bolus at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg according to ideal body weight, followed by intubation. Anesthesia maintenance will be provided with sevoflurane to keep the BIS value between 40-60. The target remifentanil concentration will be increased or decreased by 0.5 ng/mL to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 60-70 mmHg.
Group T (TIVA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter entering the patient's demographic data (height, gender, weight, and age), the Eleveld model (MedCaptain Eleveld HP TCI Infusion Syringe Pump) will be set to Ce 4 µg/mL for propofol and Ce 4 ng/mL for remifentanil in the Minto model. Ventilation with a face mask will be performed using 100% O2 after loss of consciousness and disappearance of the eyelash reflex. When the BIS value drops below 60, measurement of the degree of neuromuscular blockade (TOF - watch TOFWatch SX, Organon, Ireland) will be initiated. Rocuronium will be administered as a bolus at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg according to ideal body weight, and intubation will be performed. Anesthesia will be maintained by increasing or decreasing the target concentration of propofol by 0.5 μg/mL to keep the BIS value in the 40-60 range. The target remifentanil concentration will be increased or decreased by 0.5 ng/mL to maintain mean arterial pressure at 60-70 mmHg.
Group C (CIVIA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter entering the patient's demographic data (height, gender, weight, and age), the Ce level will be set to 4 µg/mL for propofol in the Eleveld model and 4 ng/mL for remifentanil in the Minto model. Ventilation will be performed with a face mask using 100% O2 after loss of consciousness and disappearance of the eyelash reflex. When the BIS value drops below 60, measurement of the degree of neuromuscular blockade will be initiated. Rocuronium will be administered as a bolus at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg according to ideal body weight, and intubation will be performed. For maintenance of anesthesia, inhaled sevoflurane concentration will be started at 0.5 MAC, while the propofol Ce level will be adjusted to 2 µg/mL, and propofol will be increased or decreased by 0.5 μg/mL to maintain the BIS target in the 40-60 range. Remifentanil infusion will be administered to maintain mean arterial pressure at 60-70 mmHg, with a titration of 0.5 ng/mL.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 50 years old.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I or II.
- Scheduled for elective septoplasty surgery.
- Scheduled to receive general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- History of revision septoplasty
- Known allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or the study drugs
- History of bleeding disorder
- History of allergy
- ASA Physical Status greater than III
- Body Mass Index (BMI) $\> 30
- History of hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, or cerebrovascular diseases
- History of renal dysfunction
- Use of psychiatric medications
- History of substance abuse
- Patients who refuse to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Inonu Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Inonu University
Malatya, 44250, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Wolf A, Selpien H, Haberl H, Unterberg M. Does a combined intravenous-volatile anesthesia offer advantages compared to an intravenous or volatile anesthesia alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01273-1.
PMID: 33588751RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ülkü Özgül, Professor
turgut özal medical center Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Participant: The participant will be unaware of which anesthesia method is performed in the perioperative period. Care Provider: The second anesthesiologist will wake the patient after the anesthesia has been terminated and will not know which anesthesia method was used.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 26, 2025
Study Start
December 25, 2025
Primary Completion
February 15, 2026
Study Completion
April 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share