NCT06558695

Brief Summary

Key Points:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 52 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, randomly assigned to either TIVA or sevoflurane groups.
  • Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at various time points.
  • Results:
  • No significant differences were found between the TIVA and sevoflurane groups in terms of respiratory mechanics or hemodynamic stability.
  • Both anesthesia techniques maintained stable intraoperative conditions.
  • Clinical Implications:
  • Anesthesiologists can flexibly choose between TIVA and sevoflurane based on patient-specific factors and surgical requirements.
  • TIVA may be preferred in surgeries with high neurological risk due to its compatibility with neuromonitoring.
  • Future Research:
  • Studies with broader patient populations and long-term outcomes are needed to further refine anesthesia management strategies.
  • Research on the environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of anesthesia techniques is also important.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Total intravenous anesthesiaSevofluraneRespiratory mechanics,Hemodynamic parametersSpinal surgeryProne position

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • PEEP

    positive end-expiratory pressure

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • ETCO2

    end-tidal carbon dioxide

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • VT

    tidal volume

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • Ppeak

    peak airway pressure

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • Pmean

    mean airway pressure

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • RR

    Respiratory Rate

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • MV

    Minute volume

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • Cdyn

    Dynamic. compliance

    in the supine position after intubation and in the prone position at the 30th minute

  • PaO2/FiO2

    Partial Oxygen pressure/traction of inspired oxygen

    in the prone position at the 30th minute

  • Vd/Vt

    dead space/tidal volume

    in the prone position at the 30th minute

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • HR

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • SBP

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

  • DBP

    5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position

Study Arms (2)

Sevoflurane Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the Sevoflurane group, general anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at 0.8-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC).

Drug: Sevoflurane

TIVA group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the TIVA (Total Intra Venous Anesthesia) group, a combination of propofol (50-150 μg/kg/min) and remifentanil (0.02-0.2 μg/kg/min) was used for general anesthesia instead of inhalational agents.

Drug: TIVA

Interventions

Sevoflurane was managed for maintenance of the general anestesia during spinal surgeries

Sevoflurane Group
TIVADRUG

TIVA was managed for maintenance of the general anesthesia during spinal surgeries

Also known as: Total Intra Venous Anesthesia
TIVA group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The study included male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were categorized based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status levels I, II, and III.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Major cardiac conditions, such as recent myocardial infarction or a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) less than 55%
  • Atrioventricular blocks of second and third degrees
  • Allergies to any drugs
  • Severe neurological disorders
  • History of sedative or opioid use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Stenosis

Interventions

Sevoflurane

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Methyl EthersEthersOrganic ChemicalsHydrocarbons, FluorinatedHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbons

Study Officials

  • Yücel Yüce, MD,Assoc Prf

    Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated list: the Sevoflurane group (Sevo group) and the Total Intravenous Anesthesia group (TIVA group), each comprising 26 patients. The assignment and subsequent anesthesia management were conducted in a double-blinded manner, ensuring that neither the patients nor the clinicians administering the treatments or assessing the outcomes were aware of the group allocations
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This randomized controlled trial involved 52 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated to either the TIVA group (n=26) or the sevoflurane group (n=26). Measurements of respiratory mechanics, including peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), and minute ventilation (MV), were taken at various intervals. Hemodynamic parameters such as systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were continuously monitored.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2024

First Posted

August 19, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion

June 30, 2023

Study Completion

June 30, 2024

Last Updated

August 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations