Stability Comparison of TIVA and Sevoflurane in Prone Spinal Surgery(TIVA:Total Intravenous Anesthesia)
TIVA
Comparison of TIVA and Sevoflurane: Affirming Hemodynamic, Respiratory, and Neuromonitoring Stability in Prone Position Spinal Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Key Points:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 52 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, randomly assigned to either TIVA or sevoflurane groups.
- Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at various time points.
- Results:
- No significant differences were found between the TIVA and sevoflurane groups in terms of respiratory mechanics or hemodynamic stability.
- Both anesthesia techniques maintained stable intraoperative conditions.
- Clinical Implications:
- Anesthesiologists can flexibly choose between TIVA and sevoflurane based on patient-specific factors and surgical requirements.
- TIVA may be preferred in surgeries with high neurological risk due to its compatibility with neuromonitoring.
- Future Research:
- Studies with broader patient populations and long-term outcomes are needed to further refine anesthesia management strategies.
- Research on the environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of anesthesia techniques is also important.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2024
CompletedAugust 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 months
August 12, 2024
August 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
PEEP
positive end-expiratory pressure
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
ETCO2
end-tidal carbon dioxide
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
VT
tidal volume
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
Ppeak
peak airway pressure
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
Pmean
mean airway pressure
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
RR
Respiratory Rate
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
MV
Minute volume
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
Cdyn
Dynamic. compliance
in the supine position after intubation and in the prone position at the 30th minute
PaO2/FiO2
Partial Oxygen pressure/traction of inspired oxygen
in the prone position at the 30th minute
Vd/Vt
dead space/tidal volume
in the prone position at the 30th minute
Secondary Outcomes (3)
HR
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
SBP
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
DBP
5, 15, and 30 minutes after positioning in the prone position
Study Arms (2)
Sevoflurane Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the Sevoflurane group, general anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at 0.8-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC).
TIVA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the TIVA (Total Intra Venous Anesthesia) group, a combination of propofol (50-150 μg/kg/min) and remifentanil (0.02-0.2 μg/kg/min) was used for general anesthesia instead of inhalational agents.
Interventions
Sevoflurane was managed for maintenance of the general anestesia during spinal surgeries
TIVA was managed for maintenance of the general anesthesia during spinal surgeries
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The study included male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled for lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were categorized based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status levels I, II, and III.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Major cardiac conditions, such as recent myocardial infarction or a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) less than 55%
- Atrioventricular blocks of second and third degrees
- Allergies to any drugs
- Severe neurological disorders
- History of sedative or opioid use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yücel Yüce, MD,Assoc Prf
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups using a computer-generated list: the Sevoflurane group (Sevo group) and the Total Intravenous Anesthesia group (TIVA group), each comprising 26 patients. The assignment and subsequent anesthesia management were conducted in a double-blinded manner, ensuring that neither the patients nor the clinicians administering the treatments or assessing the outcomes were aware of the group allocations
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2024
First Posted
August 19, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share