NCT07301385

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the use of the research study device, the Apple Vision Pro head-mounted spatial computing display, with the Zeiss Artevo 850 digital microscope system, for the visualization during cataract and anterior segment surgery. Specifically, researchers will assess how the study device affects surgical staff experience and workflow and monitor for patient safety and intraoperative complications associated with the use of the device.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress32%
Mar 2026Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2025

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 11, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 10, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2026

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ocular microsurgeryspatial computingeye surgeryCataract surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraoperative safety during head-mounted spatial computing visualization

    Safety will be assessed by the proportion of surgical cases completed using head-mounted spatial computing visualization without conversion to standard microscope visualization due to device-related issues, and by the occurrence of intraoperative complications potentially related to visualization, including posterior capsule rupture, vitreous loss, corneal or scleral injury, or other unplanned intraoperative events.

    Perioperative

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Surgeon workload during ocular surgery

    Immediately after surgery

  • Surgeon-reported visualization quality and ergonomics

    Immediately after surgery

  • Operating room staff workflow and usability

    Immediately after surgery

  • Operative time and setup efficiency

    Perioperative

Study Arms (1)

Spatial computing visualization of cataract and anterior segment eye surgery

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants undergo standard-of-care cataract or anterior segment ocular surgery with adjunctive use of head-mounted spatial computing visualization. There is no comparison group.

Device: Apple Vision Pro (Head-Mounted Spatial Computing Display)Device: Zeiss Artevo Digital Surgical Microscope

Interventions

FDA-cleared digital ophthalmic surgical microscope used as standard of care to visualize the operative eye during cataract and anterior segment surgery. The microscope provides the primary intraoperative imaging source for all cases, regardless of visualization display method.

Spatial computing visualization of cataract and anterior segment eye surgery

Head-mounted spatial computing display used by the surgeon to view the real-time video output from the Zeiss Artevo digital surgical microscope. The Apple Vision Pro functions solely as an alternative visualization interface and does not acquire images, alter microscope function, modify surgical technique, or affect patient care.

Spatial computing visualization of cataract and anterior segment eye surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Scheduled to undergo elective anterior segment eye surgery, including: cataract surgery, pterygium excision, corneal epithelial polishing
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent prior to participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Complex ocular pathology that could interfere with surgical visualization or increase procedural risk, including but not limited to:
  • Lens zonular instability or phacodonesis
  • Prior vitreoretinal surgery (e.g., vitrectomy, scleral buckle, glaucoma drainage device) in the operative eye
  • Significant corneal scarring, opacity, or edema
  • Active ocular surface inflammation or infection
  • Cognitive impairment or language barriers that prevent the patient from understanding and signing informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sharp Otay Lakes Surgery Center

San Diego, California, 91914, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189-194). London: Taylor & Francis.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mastropasqua R, Ruggeri ML, Quarta A, Tartaro R, Vecchiarino L, Corboli LV, Brescia L, Orione M, Russo A, Avitabile T, Mastropasqua L. New Mixed Reality Headset: First Exploratory Use in Intraocular Surgery and Telementoring. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jul;14(7):1597-1609. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01117-y. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

    PMID: 40214829BACKGROUND
  • Broderick RC, Spurzem GJ, Jeffery Reeves J, Hollandsworth HM, Sandler BJ, Jacobsen GR, Longhurst CA, Horgan S. First use of augmented reality headset in minimally invasive general surgery: seeing is believing. Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep;39(9):6055-6060. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11985-x. Epub 2025 Jul 10.

    PMID: 40640628BACKGROUND
  • Suh Y, Shin S, Kim BY, Jeong J, Kim TI. Comparison of neck angle and musculoskeletal discomfort of surgeon in cataract surgery between three-dimensional heads-up display system and conventional microscope. Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22681. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68630-1.

    PMID: 39349516BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Tommy Korn, MD

    Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group and Sharp HealthCare

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Tommy Korn, MD

CONTACT

Bishoy Said, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and workflow impact of adjunctive head-mounted spatial computing visualization during standard-of-care ocular microsurgery. All enrolled participants undergo standard-of-care ocular microsurgery with adjunctive use of a head-mounted spatial computing visualization device. There is no comparison group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ophthalmologist - Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2025

First Posted

December 24, 2025

Study Start

March 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2026

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD will not be shared to protect patient confidentiality. Only aggregated, de-identified data will be published in scientific reports on visualization performance, workflow, and surgeon and operating room staff feedback.

Locations