tDCS as Treatment for Motor Function
PSP
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment for Motor Function in Participants Living With Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Corticalbasal Syndrome Degeneration, or Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous preliminary results are sufficiently impressive to suggest that tDCS stimulation does have the potential to improve motor function when that ability is trained during stimulation. In the proposed study, the investigation will assess whether walking sessions combined with tDCS lead to improvements in motor function: gait, articulation, eye gaze, and motor dexterity. In addition, the investigators wish to examine if such results can be replicated in people with other conditions, such as cortical basal syndrome, and Parkinson's disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2030
December 18, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.1 years
November 17, 2025
December 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gait speed
Within each round, scores from the final week and final session of real tDCS stimulation will be compared to performance during the first week and final sham tDCS session to check for significant improvement. Our primary outcome measures will be those found for gait; for example, a faster walking time subsequent to tDCS stimulation compared to the placebo baseline. Participants will also return two weeks later for a post-stimulation evaluation to check if improvement was maintained. To check if the arrangement of electrodes impacts the effect, times from the final tDCS session of each round will be compared.
Measures collected at three points each round: baseline in week 1, post-treatment at the final stimulation session, and follow-up two weeks after the final session.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Articulation Quality (Clinician-Rated Speech Production on Word and Sentence Repetition)
Measures collected at three points each round: baseline in week 1, post-treatment at the final stimulation session, and follow-up two weeks after the final session.
Eye-Gaze Control (Clinician-Rated Ability to Track a Moving Target)
Measures collected at three points each round: baseline in week 1, post-treatment at the final stimulation session, and follow-up two weeks after the final session.
Study Arms (2)
Real tDCS Stimulation:
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be exposed to 20 min of tDCS brain stimulation while undergoing training on cognitive tasks.
Sham Arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will be exposed to 20 min of tDCS sham/placebo stimulation while undergoing training on cognitive tasks. Participants will have the exact same apparatus used but with no stimulation.
Interventions
The Crossover design will enable us to use each participant as their own control.
Participants will be exposed to the brain stimulation protocol while undergoing certain motor task during the training sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- 1. Participants must be able to walk unassisted, or with the assistance of a walker or cane, and be individuals who walk daily.
- \. Participants should have a sufficient level of English to be able to express themselves verbally, be able to read and follow instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Individuals with metal implants within the brain such as shunts will be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Baycrestlead
Study Sites (1)
Baycrest Academy of Health Sciences and Geriatric Research
Toronto, Ontario, M6A 2E1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tyler Roncero, Ph.D
Baycrest Academy of Health Sciences and Geriatric Research
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Howard Chertkow, MD
Baycrest Academy of Health Sciences and Geriatric Research
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
December 18, 2025
Study Start
October 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Only aggregated, de-identified summary results will be made available through publications, presentations, or upon request.