Use of Flow-Controlled Ventilation During CT-Guided Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablation
EVOLVE
Flow-controlled Ventilation During Percutaneous CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation
1 other identifier
observational
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Tumors in the liver can be treated using percutaneous ablation. At the Amsterdam UMC, this procedure is often performed under CT guidance by an interventional radiologist. The available ablation techniques include thermal ablation (microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) and non-thermal ablation (irreversible electroporation (IRE)). Thermal ablation is performed under general anesthesia or deep sedation, whereas non-thermal ablation is always performed under general anesthesia. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a ventilation technique in which increased diaphragm stability is observed due to a continuous flow during both inspiration and expiration. This contrasts with volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation, where active inspiration is followed by passive expiration through an increase in pressure or flow, leading to greater diaphragm movement during the ventilation cycle. With volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation, diaphragm position fluctuates between inspiration and expiration, requiring temporary pauses in ventilation (apnea; allowing the diaphragm to become motionless) during ablation needle positioning. During volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation and the associated apnea periods, increased formation of atelectasis is often observed. This results in changes in diaphragm position during and after each apnea, which can complicate accurate needle placement. With FCV, apnea is not necessary-the continuous flow results in minimal diaphragm excursion and can be maintained throughout the entire procedure without interruption. Both ventilation modes are currently used during CT-guided percutaneous ablation of liver and pancreatic tumors. However, the choice of ventilation technique presently lies with the attending anesthesiologist. In practice, some anesthesiologists prefer volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation, as these are traditionally the most commonly used modes. Others opt for FCV due to its minimal effect on diaphragm excursion and its potentially beneficial effects on atelectasis formation and intraprocedural image quality. Given the subdiaphragmatic location of both organs and the presence of critical surrounding structures that must be preserved during the procedure, interventional radiologists find FCV particularly advantageous. Moreover, continuous ventilation without apnea is preferred by anesthesiologists, as it avoids periods of reduced oxygenation. FCV is an already approved ventilation technique at Amsterdam UMC and is used during percutaneous ablations, surgeries performed by ENT and pulmonary specialists, and in the intensive care unit for critically ill patients. Through this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the use of FCV as a ventilation technique during CT-guided percutaneous ablations of liver tumors and to compare it with volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Aug 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedDecember 18, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
November 25, 2025
December 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Switch from flow controlled ventilation to volume controlled ventilation
Switch if deemed necessary by the anesthesiologist performing the ventilation.
During the CT-guided percutaneous ablation procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Image-based analyses
During the ablation procedure
Modified five-point Surgical Rating Scale
Directly after the ablation procedure
Study Arms (2)
Flow controlled ventilation
Patients recieving CT-guided percutaneous ablation, ventilated with flow controlled ventilation
Volume controlled ventilation
Patients recieving CT-guided percutaneous ablation, ventilated with volume controlled ventilation
Interventions
Flow controlled ventilation will be investigated during CT-guided percutaneous ablation of liver tumors
Eligibility Criteria
Patients eligible for CT-guided percutaneous ablation of liver tumors
You may qualify if:
- Clinical indication for CT-guided percutaneous ablation of one or more liver tumours
- Approval for general anaesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Procedures performed under procedural sedation
- Uncontrolled asthma, and (4) COPD classified as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage III or IV
- No signed informed consent form
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam, 1081HV, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Drs, MD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2025
First Posted
December 18, 2025
Study Start
August 20, 2024
Primary Completion
May 20, 2025
Study Completion
November 20, 2025
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12