NCT07287332

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to compare two different ways of dosing cefepime, an antibiotic for very sick patients - the usual approach to dosing or a new dosing method. The new dosing method uses only doses that are available in normal care, but choosing between the different doses is based on more information about the patient's body including their kidney function. The primary purpose of this study is to test how easy it is for healthcare professionals to use the new dosing method and how best to conduct the trial. The study will also assess if the new dosing method helps patients recover faster and reduces side effects.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable sepsis

Timeline
13mo left

Started Jan 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress28%
Jan 2026Jul 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2025

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2025

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 15, 2026

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Beta-lactam antibioticsSepsisSeptic shockPharmacokineticsPersonalized medicineTherapeutic drug monitoringInfectious disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Proportion of patients screened who qualified for the study

    Number of patients who quality for the study out of total number of patients screened, reported as a percentage

    1 year or once the sample size is achieved

  • Distribution of qualified patients across care teams

    Number of patients from each ICU care team who qualify for the study

    1 year or once the sample size is achieved

  • Adherence to dosing recommendations

    Total number of patients randomized to the up-front individualized dosing algorithm who are prescribed the algorithm's recommended dosage

    1 year or once the sample size is achieved

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of antibiotic-free days

    28-days

  • ICU length of stay

    1 year

  • Proportion of patients who experience new anti-Pseudomonal beta-lactam resistance

    6 months

  • Proportion of patients who experience clinical success

    8 days

  • Proportion of patients who experience microbiologic success

    8 days

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Up-front individualized dosing algorithm

EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical decision support to encourage use of an individualized cefepime dosing algorithm based on eGFRcr-cysC and weight.

Other: Up-front individualized dosing algorithm

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard of care group will receive empiric dosing of cefepime, using an institutional antimicrobial guide based on four categories of eGFRcr.

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

An individualized cefepime dosing algorithm will be used to determine the cefepime dose and interval. The dose recommendation will be provided using the EHR-prompts to the clinical care team and ordered and/or verified by the ICU pharmacist using an established collaborative practice agreement. As a pragmatic trial, at any point care teams may modify the empiric or subsequent dose based on their clinical judgement.

Up-front individualized dosing algorithm

The standard of care group will receive empiric dosing guided by an institutional antimicrobial guide. Cefepime is typically dosed at 0.5-2 g every 8-24 h according to categorical thresholds of estimated creatinine clearance (eGFRcr). Cystatin C and eGFRcr-cys can be calculated and used at clinicians' discretion to aid in drug dose determination.

Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults ≥18 years of age
  • Admitted to one of the ICUs at the study center
  • Prescribed cefepime therapy by the care team

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals will be those with a cephalosporin allergy
  • Received \>1 dose of cefepime in the 24 hours before ICU admission
  • Transferred from an external hospital without compatible EHR
  • Does not have a cystatin C and a creatinine available for drug dosing
  • Acute kidney injury stage 2 or higher
  • Receiving renal replacement therapy
  • Treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • Undergoing molecular adsorbent recirculating therapy at the time of beta-lactam initiation
  • Pregnant
  • Incarcerated
  • Declined Minnesota research authorization

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Barreto EF, Scheetz MH, Chang J, Cole KC, Fogelson LA, Paul J, Jannetto PJ, Gajic O, Rule AD; Beta Lactam Optimization and Outcomes Management (BLOOM) Study Group. Cystatin C-Guided Dosing Nomogram Improves Target Attainment for Cefepime in the Critically Ill. Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr 1;53(4):e941-e952. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006622. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

    PMID: 40013864BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisInfectionsShock, SepticCommunicable Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShockDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Erin Barreto, PharmD, PhD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Gerald W. Flaby Jr., LRT, RRT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Posted

December 17, 2025

Study Start

January 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations