NCT04495946

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if implementation of the Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program within a large healthcare system will improve outcomes for high-risk patients with suspected sepsis, while concurrently examining contextual factors related to STAR program delivery within routine care to generate knowledge of best practices for implementation and dissemination of post sepsis transitions of care. To address persistent morbidity and mortality for sepsis survivors, Atrium Health developed the Sepsis Treatment and Recovery (STAR) program which uses a nurse navigator to deliver a bundle of best-practice care elements for the delivery of longitudinal post-sepsis care for up to 90 days. These care elements are directed towards the specific challenges and sequelae following a sepsis hospitalization and include: 1) identification and treatment of new physical, mental, and cognitive deficits; 2) review and adjustment of medications; 3) surveillance of treatable conditions that commonly lead to poor outcomes including chronic conditions that may de-stabilize during sepsis and recovery; and 4) focus on palliative care when appropriate. ENCOMPASS (Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship) is an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I trial, with the evaluation designed as a two-arm, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial conducted at eight regional hospitals in which each participating hospital begins in a usual care control phase and transitions to the STAR program intervention in a randomly assigned sequence. Patients are allocated to receive the treatment condition (i.e., usual care or STAR) assigned to their admission hospital at time of enrollment. ENCOMPASS will test the hypothesis that patients who receive care through the STAR program will have reduced mortality and hospital readmission assessed 90 days post index hospital discharge compared to patients who receive usual care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,894

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2020

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 3, 2020

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2020

Results QC Date

July 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

evidence based medicinetransition carecritical careimplementation sciencepragmatic clinical trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • All-cause Mortality and Hospital Readmission Rate

    Combined death or unplanned hospital readmission due to any cause, assessed 90 days after the index hospital discharge

    90 days

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Number of Days Alive and Outside the Hospital

    90 days

  • All-cause Mortality Rate

    90 days

  • All-cause Hospital Readmission Rate

    90 days

  • Number of Outpatient Provider Visits

    90 days

  • Number of Emergency Department Visits

    90 days

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) Program

EXPERIMENTAL

Virtual sepsis navigation delivered across the peri-hospital discharge interval

Behavioral: Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard of care received through Atrium Health facilities for patients hospitalized with sepsis. Aspects of usual care will be determined by treating clinicians independent of trial assignment.

Behavioral: Usual care

Interventions

In the STAR program intervention, a centrally located nurse navigator facilitates the application of four evidence-based core components of post-sepsis care (i.e., review of medications, new impairments, comorbidities, and palliative care) to patients prior to and during the 90 days after hospital discharge. The STAR navigator will provide telephone and EHR-based support within the hospitalization and to patients across all discharge settings with remote monitoring at specified intervals following hospital discharge. Patients will continue to receive STAR directed services for 90 days following their discharge and then will be transitioned back to the next appropriate care location.

Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) Program
Usual careBEHAVIORAL

Hospitals and their patients will not have access to the STAR program. Patients will continue to receive usual care throughout their stay and discharge, consisting of: patient education and follow-up instructions at discharge, which are not specific to sepsis; routine recommendations for follow-up visits with primary care providers; arrangements for home health services or care management follow-up based on each patient's needs but not specifically tailored to the sepsis population; discharge to post-acute setting with no sepsis-specific follow-up. All aspects of usual care will be determined by treating clinicians independent of trial assignment.

Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 18 years of age upon admission
  • Suspected infection
  • Oral/parenteral antibiotic or bacterial culture order within 24 hours of emergency department presentation; and
  • Evidence of systemic inflammatory response (i.e., at least two abnormal of temperature; heart rate; respiratory rate; and WBC count or bands)
  • Evidence of organ dysfunction (i.e., at least two points on either Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment or Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment risk tools)
  • Deemed as high risk for 90-day readmission using risk-scoring models
  • Not discharged at the time of patient list generation

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a change in code status (i.e., do not resuscitate, do not intubate) within 24 hours after infection onset due to presumed limitation of aggressive treatment
  • Patients who reside \> 2.5 hours drive time from the treating hospital
  • Patients actively enrolled in a different care management program at time of admission
  • Patient has been randomized previously.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Atrium Health

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, Angus DC, Reinhart K; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC.

    PMID: 26414292BACKGROUND
  • Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

    PMID: 28101605BACKGROUND
  • Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.

    PMID: 24638143BACKGROUND
  • Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1787-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553.

    PMID: 20978258BACKGROUND
  • Borges RC, Carvalho CR, Colombo AS, da Silva Borges MP, Soriano FG. Physical activity, muscle strength, and exercise capacity 3 months after severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Aug;41(8):1433-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3914-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

    PMID: 26109398BACKGROUND
  • Annane D, Sharshar T. Cognitive decline after sepsis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70246-2. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PMID: 25434614BACKGROUND
  • Prescott HC, Langa KM, Iwashyna TJ. Readmission diagnoses after hospitalization for severe sepsis and other acute medical conditions. JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1055-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1410. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25756444BACKGROUND
  • Mayr FB, Talisa VB, Balakumar V, Chang CH, Fine M, Yende S. Proportion and Cost of Unplanned 30-Day Readmissions After Sepsis Compared With Other Medical Conditions. JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):530-531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20468. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28114505BACKGROUND
  • Prescott HC, Angus DC. Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review. JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):62-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687.

    PMID: 29297082BACKGROUND
  • Taylor SP, Chou SH, Sierra MF, Shuman TP, McWilliams AD, Taylor BT, Russo M, Evans SL, Rossman W, Murphy S, Cunningham K, Kowalkowski MA. Association between Adherence to Recommended Care and Outcomes for Adult Survivors of Sepsis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):89-97. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201907-514OC.

    PMID: 31644304BACKGROUND
  • Brownson RC, Allen P, Duggan K, Stamatakis KA, Erwin PC. Fostering more-effective public health by identifying administrative evidence-based practices: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):309-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.006.

    PMID: 22898125BACKGROUND
  • Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1064-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0706165. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18322289BACKGROUND
  • Coleman EA, Berenson RA. Lost in transition: challenges and opportunities for improving the quality of transitional care. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):533-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00009.

    PMID: 15466770BACKGROUND
  • Kim CS, Flanders SA. In the Clinic. Transitions of care. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):ITC3-1. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-01003. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23460071BACKGROUND
  • Taylor SP, Eaton T, Rios A, Boyd D, Tapp H, McWilliams A, Chou SH, Halpern S, Angus DC, McCurdy L, Ganesan A, Nguyen H, Connor CD, Kowalkowski M. Proactive Telehealth-Based Sepsis Transition and Recovery Support, Hospital Readmission, and Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Oct 1;185(10):1238-1246. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3699.

  • Eaton TA, Kowalkowski M, Burns R, Tapp H, O'Hare K, Taylor SP. Pre-implementation planning for a sepsis intervention in a large learning health system: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11344-x.

  • Kowalkowski M, Eaton T, McWilliams A, Tapp H, Rios A, Murphy S, Burns R, Gutnik B, O'Hare K, McCurdy L, Dulin M, Blanchette C, Chou SH, Halpern S, Angus DC, Taylor SP. Protocol for a two-arm pragmatic stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship (ENCOMPASS). BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06521-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Interventions

Salvage Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Marc Kowalkowski, PhD
Organization
Wake Forest University School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Marc Kowalkowski, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Stephanie P Taylor, MD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Posted

August 3, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion

April 1, 2024

Study Completion

April 1, 2024

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Results First Posted

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations