A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
HILT
A Comparison of Efficacy Between High-intensity Laser Therapy and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patient With Plantar Fasciitis; Single Blinded Randomize Controlled Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (fESWT) in reducing pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. The study also examines the effects of HILT and fESWT on health-related outcomes, including VAS-FA, FFI, plantar fascia thickness, and adverse events. Researchers will compare HILT with fESWT as treatment options for patients with plantar fasciitis. Participants will receive either HILT or fESWT along with an exercise program. They will attend follow-up visits to assess outcomes at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 weeks after the first treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 25, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2027
March 25, 2026
March 1, 2026
10 months
December 3, 2025
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analog scale (VAS)
a pain rating scale based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm) Measurements from the starting point (left end) of the scale to the patients' marks are recorded in centimeters and are interpreted as their pain
Pre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
VAS-FA Thai version
Pre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatment
Foot function index Thai version
Pre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatment
Thickness of plantar fasciitis
Pre-treatment, and 12-week post-treatment
Adverse events
Pre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatment
Study Arms (2)
HILT group
EXPERIMENTALHigh-power laser therapy (iLUX® XP) was applied using a power output of 6 W, an energy density of 5 J/cm², and a spot size of 10 cm², delivering a total energy of 150 J per session. Treatment consisted of 6 sessions, administered twice per week for 3 weeks.
fESWT group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFocused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT) using the DUOLITH® SD1 (STORZ Medical) was applied at a frequency of 4 Hz, starting at an energy flux density of 0.2 mJ/mm² and gradually increased as tolerated. Each session consisted of 2,000 shocks, for a total of 3 sessions (one session per week)
Interventions
High-power laser therapy (iLUX® XP) was applied using a power output of 6 W, an energy density of 5 J/cm², and a spot size of 10 cm², delivering a total energy of 150 J per session. Treatment consisted of 6 sessions, administered twice per week for 3 weeks
Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT) using the DUOLITH® SD1 (STORZ Medical) was applied at a frequency of 4 Hz, starting at an energy flux density of 0.2 mJ/mm² and gradually increased as tolerated. Each session consisted of 2,000 shocks, for a total of 3 sessions (one session per week)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-70 years
- Pain was worse in the initial step after and an extended period of rest
- Pain was decreased initially after the first steps but exacerbated with increased activity
- VAS ≥ 4
- Pain was localized and sharp but not radiating,
- Pain was reproduced with palpation of the plantar fascia
You may not qualify if:
- Have Wound/Infection/tumor in treatment area
- History of foot trauma in 3 months
- History of intervention at plantar fascia in 6 months such as Ultrasound therapy, steroid injection, surgery or botulinum toxin injection
- Pain medication within one week before participation
- Patient wasn't desired to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (26)
Sahni K, Sanyal B, Agrawal MS, Pant GC, Khanna NN, Khanna S. Carcinoma of breast associated with pregnancy and lactation. J Surg Oncol. 1981;16(2):167-73. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930160208.
PMID: 7464155RESULTMorrissey D, Cotchett M, Said J'Bari A, Prior T, Griffiths IB, Rathleff MS, Gulle H, Vicenzino B, Barton CJ. Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Oct;55(19):1106-1118. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101970. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
PMID: 33785535RESULTAlam M, Warycha M. Complications of lasers and light treatments. Dermatol Ther. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):571-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2012.01476.x.
PMID: 22515672RESULTErmutlu C, Aksakal M, Gumustas A, Ozkaya G, Kovalak E, Ozkan Y. Thickness of plantar fascia is not predictive of functional outcome in plantar fasciitis treatment. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Nov;52(6):442-446. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
PMID: 30314878RESULTAngthong C, Chernchujit B, Suntharapa T, Harnroongroj T. Visual analogue scale foot and ankle: validity and reliability of Thai version of the new outcome score in subjective form. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Aug;94(8):952-7.
PMID: 21863677RESULTDelgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PMID: 30211382RESULTKeskula DR, Tamburello M. Conservative management of piriformis syndrome. J Athl Train. 1992;27(2):102-10.
PMID: 16558144RESULTNaruseviciute D, Kubilius R. The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: randomized participant blind controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Aug;34(8):1072-1082. doi: 10.1177/0269215520929073. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
PMID: 32513018RESULTGollwitzer H, Diehl P, von Korff A, Rahlfs VW, Gerdesmeyer L. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic painful heel syndrome: a prospective, double blind, randomized trial assessing the efficacy of a new electromagnetic shock wave device. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;46(5):348-57. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.05.011.
PMID: 17761319RESULTHuffer D, Hing W, Newton R, Clair M. Strength training for plantar fasciitis and the intrinsic foot musculature: A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 Mar;24:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
PMID: 27692740RESULTPorter D, Barrill E, Oneacre K, May BD. The effects of duration and frequency of Achilles tendon stretching on dorsiflexion and outcome in painful heel syndrome: a randomized, blinded, control study. Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Jul;23(7):619-24. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300706.
PMID: 12146772RESULTPetraglia F, Ramazzina I, Costantino C. Plantar fasciitis in athletes: diagnostic and treatment strategies. A systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017 May 10;7(1):107-118. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.107. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.
PMID: 28717618RESULTZare Bidoki M, Vafaeei Nasab MR, Khatibi Aghda A. Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Mar 1;49(3):147-155. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98042.2991. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PMID: 38584653RESULTThammajaree C, Theapthong M, Palee P, Pakpakorn P, Sitti T, Sakulsriprasert P, Bunprajun T, Thong-On S. Effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus high intensity laser therapy in individuals with plantar fasciitis: A randomised clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2023 May 23;38(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03791-5.
PMID: 37219650RESULTOrdahan B, Karahan AY, Kaydok E. The effect of high-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Aug;33(6):1363-1369. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2497-6. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
PMID: 29627888RESULTEbid AA, Alhammad RM, Alhendi RT, Alqarhi BA, Baweyan EM, Alfadli LH, Alzahrani MA, Alotaibi MF, Alaidrous NA, Alzahrani RA, Alqurashi RM, Alharbi SS, Azhar SJ. Immediate effect of pulsed high-intensity neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser on staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa growth: an experimental study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Nov;31(11):925-930. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.925. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
PMID: 31871379RESULTFarivar S, Malekshahabi T, Shiari R. Biological effects of low level laser therapy. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Spring;5(2):58-62.
PMID: 25653800RESULTAhmad MA, A Hamid MS, Yusof A. Effects of low-level and high-intensity laser therapy as adjunctive to rehabilitation exercise on pain, stiffness and function in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2022 Mar;114:85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
PMID: 34654554RESULTRoerdink RL, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard B, van der Worp H, Zwerver J. Complications of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in plantar fasciitis: Systematic review. Int J Surg. 2017 Oct;46:133-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.587. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
PMID: 28890412RESULTMariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Marlinghaus E, Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2366-72. doi: 10.2174/092986709788682119.
PMID: 19601786RESULTLohrer H, Nauck T, Dorn-Lange NV, Scholl J, Vester JC. Comparison of radial versus focused extracorporeal shock waves in plantar fasciitis using functional measures. Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Jan;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0001.
PMID: 20067715RESULTMelese H, Alamer A, Getie K, Nigussie F, Ayhualem S. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and foot functions in subjects with chronic plantar fasciitis: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(18):5007-5014. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1928775. Epub 2021 May 26.
PMID: 34038642RESULTDiaz Lopez AM, Guzman Carrasco P. [Effectiveness of different physical therapy in conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis: systematic review]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014 Jan-Feb;88(1):157-78. doi: 10.4321/S1135-57272014000100010. Spanish.
PMID: 24728397RESULTThong-On S, Bovonsunthonchai S, Vachalathiti R, Intiravoranont W, Suwannarat S, Smith R. Effects of Strengthening and Stretching Exercises on the Temporospatial Gait Parameters in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019 Dec;43(6):662-676. doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.6.662. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
PMID: 31918529RESULTJarde O, Diebold P, Havet E, Boulu G, Vernois J. Degenerative lesions of the plantar fascia: surgical treatment by fasciectomy and excision of the heel spur. A report on 38 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2003 Jun;69(3):267-74.
PMID: 12879710RESULTThompson JV, Saini SS, Reb CW, Daniel JN. Diagnosis and management of plantar fasciitis. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014 Dec;114(12):900-6. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2014.177.
PMID: 25429080RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Posted
December 16, 2025
Study Start
February 28, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 20, 2027
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Data will be analyzed and reported only in aggregate form in scientific publications, including baseline characteristics and study outcomes