Outdoor Horseback Riding and Its Effects on Muscle Strength, Balance, Sleep, and Movement
Effects of Outdoor Horseback Riding on Lower Extremity Muscle Strength, Core Stabilization, Balance, Sleep Quality, and Functional Movement Capacity in Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
observational
64
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the effects of regular outdoor horseback riding on lower extremity muscle strength, core stabilization, balance, functional movement capacity, sleep quality, and overall well-being in healthy adults. Participants with at least 6 months of routine outdoor horseback riding will be compared to non-riders to evaluate differences in physical performance and functional capacity. The study will provide evidence on the potential health benefits of horseback riding.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2026
CompletedApril 9, 2026
December 1, 2025
3 months
December 3, 2025
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Lower Extremity Muscle Strength
Lower extremity muscle strength assessments will be performed using a digital hand-held dynamometer. The force parameters were recorded in kilograms. Isometric muscle strength measurements will be carried out for the following muscle groups: Hip: Flexion, Extension, Abduction, and Adduction Knee: Flexion and Extension Ankle: Plantar flexion, Dorsiflexion For each muscle group, participants will be instructed to maintain maximum isometric muscle contractions that reach equilibrium against the counterforce applied by the researcher, while sustaining the test positions for approximately 3 seconds. Each movement will be performed three times, and the average of these three trials will be considered for evaluation. To minimize fatigue, a rest period of 30-60 seconds will be given between repetitions and 2 minutes between different tests.
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Core Stabilization (Assessed using the plank test)
Participants will be asked to rise by supporting themselves on their elbows and hands, positioned at shoulder level on the mat, while also maintaining support on their toes. During the test, it will be expected that the spine and pelvis remain in a neutral position and that normal breathing is sustained. Participants will be required to maintain this position without descending to the mat, without experiencing pain, and without deviating more than 5 cm in their back, for up to a maximum of 3 minutes. The stopwatch will be started with the command "Start!" and stopped when one of the predetermined termination criteria occurs. The duration will be recorded in seconds, rounded to the nearest whole second.
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Functional Movement Screen
FMS consists of seven test component which are used to evaluate various main movement models.Individuals completed one by one deep squat, high stepping, single line lunge, shoulder mobility, straight leg raises, trunk stability push-ups, rotation stability which are component tests. Subcomponent tests assess asymmetry by measuring the individual bilaterally. Each component test was scored on an ordinal scale (0 to 3 points), with a maximum score of 3, based on the quality of the movement. Less than 3 points indicated that the individual performed some form of compensation or was unable to complete the entire movement.. The scores of the component tests were summed, resulting in a composite score between 0 and 21 points, with a maximum score of 21
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Y-Balance Test Score
YBT, which is performed in the standing position on one leg , is dynamic a test. Participants stood on the footplate in the centre of the Y Balance Test area and then, it was given instruction them that they should maintain a single leg stance while reaching as far as possible with the opposite leg and return to the starting position on the centre platform without losing balance.In the test, individuals were asked to reach the maximum distance in 3 directions (anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral), allowing 3 trials for each leg. The maximum reach distance was recorded for each consecutive trial
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT)
MFRT is a seated version of the original standing test and assesses the limits of balance. The participant sits on a chair with the hips, knees, and ankles flexed at 90 degrees, with the soles of the feet fully in contact with the floor. A horizontal ruler is mounted on the wall at the level of the acromion of the unaffected arm. The starting measurement is taken at the level of the fifth finger when the arm is extended forward at 90 degrees of flexion. The test is performed in three different positions, each consisting of three trials: 1. Reaching forward with the unaffected side facing the wall. 2. Bending to the right with the back against the wall. 3. Bending to the left with the back against the wall. Participants are asked to reach the maximum distance without rotating or touching the wall. After reaching, the position of the fifth finger is marked again, and the distance is measured in centimeters.
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions which measures seven aspects of sleep: (1) subjective sleep quality, (2) sleep latency, (3) sleep duration, (4) habitual sleep efficiency, (5) sleep disturbances, (6) use of sleeping medication, and (7) daytime dysfunction. The 19 self-rated items are combined to form seven component scores, each of which has a range of 0-3 points (0 indicates no difficulty, while 3 indicates severe difficulty). The seven component scores are then summed to yield one global score, with a range of 0-21 points (0 indicating no difficulty, and 21 indicating severe difficulties in all the seven areas of sleep quality).
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) consists of 21 self-reported items (four-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. p.) used to assess the intensity of physical and cognitive anxiety symptoms during the past week. Scores may range from 0 to 63: minimal anxiety levels (0-7), mild anxiety (8-15), moderate anxiety (16-25), and severe anxiety (26-63).
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a generic self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the quality of life in relation to health status. It is a 36-item valid and reliable evaluation with eight areas covering physical functioning, role limitations brought on by physical issues, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations brought on by emotional issues, and perceived mental health. The SF-36 also contains a single question called "health transition" that measures how respondents feel their over health status has changed over the course of a year. The scores range from 0-100 (the worst possible to the most possible)
Single assessment during study visit (1 day)
Study Arms (2)
Horseback Riders group
Horseback Riders: Adults aged 18-65 who have been riding horses outdoors regularly (at least once per week) for a minimum of 6 months. Participants will undergo assessments of lower extremity muscle strength, core stabilization, balance, functional movement, and sleep quality. No experimental interventions are assigned; participants continue their usual riding activities.
Healthy group (Non-riders / Control Group)
Adults aged 18-65 who do not ride horses.Participants will undergo assessments of lower extremity muscle strength, core stabilization, balance, functional movement, and sleep quality.
Eligibility Criteria
The study will include healthy adults aged 18-65 years. Participants will be divided into two groups: individuals who have been regularly practicing outdoor horseback riding for at least 6 months (minimum once per week) and individuals who do not participate in horseback riding or regular physical activity. All participants must be able to understand instructions, communicate effectively, and complete the study assessments.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 65 years. Regular outdoor horseback riding for at least 6 months (minimum once per week). Voluntary participation and signed informed consent. Healthy individuals without chronic musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or neurological diseases.
- Cognitive ability to understand instructions and communicate.
You may not qualify if:
- Any orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular, or respiratory disease. Diagnosed sleep disorder, anxiety, depression, or other psychiatric conditions. Major surgery within the past 6 months. Pregnancy. Physical or cognitive conditions preventing completion of study protocols. Inability to comply with test procedures or cooperate during assessments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Istinye University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Istınye Unıversıtesı
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
İstinye University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (17)
Uldahl M, Christensen JW, Clayton HM. Relationships between the Rider's Pelvic Mobility and Balance on a Gymnastic Ball with Equestrian Skills and Effects on Horse Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;11(2):453. doi: 10.3390/ani11020453.
PMID: 33572205RESULTAsgari M, Alizadeh S, Sendt A, Jaitner T. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) in Identifying Active Females Who are Prone to Injury. A Systematic Review. Sports Med Open. 2021 Nov 22;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00380-0.
PMID: 34807359RESULTO'Connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2224-30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d.
PMID: 21606876RESULTKatz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(3):243-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280801927830.
PMID: 18608433RESULTVazquez Morejon AJ, Vazquez-Morejon Jimenez R, Zanin GB. Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric characteristics in a sample from the clinical Spanish population. Span J Psychol. 2014 Oct 28;17:E76. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.76.
PMID: 26055653RESULTDemiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S, Akvardar Y, Kivircik B, Alptekin K. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 9;6:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-247.
PMID: 17029646RESULTSipe CL, Ramey KD, Plisky PP, Taylor JD. Y-Balance Test: A Valid and Reliable Assessment in Older Adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Sep 1;27(5):663-669. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0330.
PMID: 30676192RESULTGarcia-Pena IM, Gomez AG, Guerrero-Barona E, Moreno-Manso JM, Barrios-Fernandez S. Physical Activity and Sleep Improvements in a Group of Equestrian Therapy Volunteers: A Pilot Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Mar 30;2022:5364491. doi: 10.1155/2022/5364491. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35399627RESULTThompson Coon J, Boddy K, Stein K, Whear R, Barton J, Depledge MH. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Mar 1;45(5):1761-72. doi: 10.1021/es102947t. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
PMID: 21291246RESULTPeddie L, Gosselin Boucher V, Buckler EJ, Noseworthy M, Haight BL, Pratt S, Injege B, Koehle M, Faulkner G, Puterman E. Acute effects of outdoor versus indoor exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;18(4):853-883. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2383758. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
PMID: 39108077RESULTElmeua Gonzalez M, Sarabon N. Muscle modes of the equestrian rider at walk, rising trot and canter. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 18;15(8):e0237727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237727. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32810165RESULTBystrom A, Egenvall A, Eisersio M, Engell MT, Lykken S, Lundesjo Kvart S. The impact of teaching approach on horse and rider biomechanics during riding lessons. Heliyon. 2025 Jan 14;11(2):e41947. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41947. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
PMID: 39906839RESULTLegg K, Cochrane D, Gee E, Macdermid P, Rogers C. Physiological Demands and Muscle Activity of Jockeys in Trial and Race Riding. Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 8;12(18):2351. doi: 10.3390/ani12182351.
PMID: 36139208RESULTKim MJ, Kim T, Oh S, Yoon B. Equine Exercise in Younger and Older Adults: Simulated Versus Real Horseback Riding. Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Feb;125(1):93-108. doi: 10.1177/0031512517736463. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
PMID: 29073822RESULTYu CH, Kim UR, Kwon TK. Fundamental study of basal physical fitness and activities of daily living for the aged in relation to indoor horse riding exercise. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2407-15. doi: 10.3233/BME-141054.
PMID: 25226941RESULTCollado-Mateo D, Lavin-Perez AM, Fuentes Garcia JP, Garcia-Gordillo MA, Villafaina S. Effects of Equine-Assisted Therapies or Horse-Riding Simulators on Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Aug 31;56(9):444. doi: 10.3390/medicina56090444.
PMID: 32878327RESULTYu CH, Hong CU, Kang SR, Kwon TK. Analysis of basal physical fitness and lumbar muscle function according to indoor horse riding exercise. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2395-405. doi: 10.3233/BME-141053.
PMID: 25226940RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2025
First Posted
December 16, 2025
Study Start
December 30, 2025
Primary Completion
April 7, 2026
Study Completion
April 8, 2026
Last Updated
April 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12