Comparison of Acceleromyography and Electromyography in Obese Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
OBAEG
2 other identifiers
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective observational study is to compare two different methods of monitoring muscle relaxation during anesthesia - acceleromyography (AMG) and electromyography (EMG) - in people with obesity who are having bariatric surgery with general anesthesia and the muscle relaxant rocuronium. The main question is: Which method is more accurate and precise in measuring the Train-of-Four (TOF) ratio during surgery? As part of this comparison, researchers will also note how quickly each method detects recovery of muscle function after the reversal drug sugammadex. Participants will:
- Receive standard anesthesia care for bariatric surgery, including rocuronium to relax the muscles.
- Have two small monitoring devices applied, one to each hand: AMG on one hand, EMG on the other.
- Be monitored for muscle function during surgery and after receiving sugammadex to reverse the muscle relaxation. Researchers will also record how easy each device is to use and whether participants have any breathing problems after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
December 15, 2025
August 1, 2025
6 months
November 25, 2025
December 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean paired difference in TOF ratio (AMG vs EMG)
Mean difference between acceleromyography (AMG) and electromyography (EMG) measurements of the Train-of-Four (TOF) ratio (unitless) obtained from paired intraoperative recordings.
Intraoperative period
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Time to optimal conditions for tracheal intubation
From rocuronium administration to tracheal intubation (approximately 1-3 minutes).
Maintenance of deep neuromuscular block
From induction of anesthesia to start of reversal with sugammadex (approximately 60-120 minutes)
Time to recovery of TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 after sugammadex
From administration of sugammadex to achievement of TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 (typically 1-5 minutes).
Usability and quality assessment of AMG and EMG monitoring
At the end of anesthesia (single assessment).
Incidence of postoperative respiratory complications
Through PACU discharge (approximately 1-2 hours after surgery).
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery
Adults with obesity scheduled for bariatric surgery under general anesthesia. Each participant will be monitored for neuromuscular function using both acceleromyography (AMG) and electromyography (EMG) during surgery and after administration of sugammadex.
Interventions
Neuromuscular function will be assessed using an electromyography device applied to the hand. The device measures the electrical activity of muscles in response to ulnar nerve stimulation to calculate the Train-of-Four (TOF) ratio.
Neuromuscular function will be assessed using an acceleromyography device applied to the hand. The device measures the acceleration of thumb movement in response to ulnar nerve stimulation to calculate the Train-of-Four (TOF) ratio.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults aged 18-65 years with pathological obesity (Class II with comorbidities or Class III) scheduled for bariatric surgery under general anesthesia.
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-65 years
- Pathological obesity (Class II with comorbidities or Class III)
- Scheduled for bariatric surgery under general anesthesia
- Written informed consent obtained
You may not qualify if:
- Severe acute or chronic respiratory disease (e.g., asthma, COPD, severe restrictive disease)
- Severe acute or recent cardiac disease (e.g., acute or recent myocardial infarction, inducible ischemia, heart failure)
- End-stage hepatic or renal disease
- Intolerance, allergy, or contraindication to study-related drugs
- Absence of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Padovalead
- University Hospital, Padua, Italycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedale - Università di Padova (Padua University Hospital)
Padua, PD, 35127, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Carron M, Safaee Fakhr B, Ieppariello G, Foletto M. Perioperative care of the obese patient. Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(2):e39-e55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11447.
PMID: 31903602BACKGROUNDWedemeyer Z, Michaelsen KE, Jelacic S, Silliman W, Lopez A, Togashi K, Bowdle A. Accuracy and Precision of Three Acceleromyographs, Three Electromyographs, and a Mechanomyograph Measuring the Train-of-four Ratio in the Absence of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs. Anesthesiology. 2024 Aug 1;141(2):262-271. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005051.
PMID: 38728090BACKGROUNDNaguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738.
PMID: 28044330BACKGROUNDFuchs-Buder T, Romero CS, Lewald H, Lamperti M, Afshari A, Hristovska AM, Schmartz D, Hinkelbein J, Longrois D, Popp M, de Boer HD, Sorbello M, Jankovic R, Kranke P. Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: A guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Feb 1;40(2):82-94. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001769. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
PMID: 36377554BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2025
First Posted
December 15, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared. Aggregate, de-identified study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations