NCT07281183

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of manual therapy alone and manual therapy combined with Reformer Pilates exercises in women with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 28, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 19, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 19, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 15, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

painlow backpilatesexercise

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), used to assess pain intensity, is a simple, reliable, and easily applicable method. This scale consists of a standard 10 cm vertical or horizontal straight line, with one end indicating "no pain" (0) and the other end indicating "the most severe pain" (10). The patient is asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their current level of pain. The score is then determined based on the location of the mark. Studies have reported that the VAS is a reliable tool for measuring pain intensity.

    4 months

  • Oswestry Disability Index: ODI

    This scale, which is widely used to assess the level of functional disability in individuals with low back pain, evaluates daily living activities. It consists of a total of 10 subcategories: pain intensity, degree of pain variation, personal care, lifting, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and sexual activity. Each section contains six statements scored from 0 to 5. The individual is asked to choose the statement that best describes their current condition. The total score ranges from 0 to 50. The interpretation of scores is as follows: 1-10 points: Mild functional disability 11-30 points: Moderate functional disability 31-50 points: Severe functional disability The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Yakut et al.

    4 months

  • Back Pain Functional Scale : FBAS

    This scale is used to assess the extent to which individuals' functional levels are affected by low back pain. The functional areas included in the scale are as follows: work, school, home activities, hobbies, forward bending, putting on shoes or socks, lifting objects from the floor, sleeping, sitting, standing, walking, climbing stairs, and driving. For individuals who do not drive, the last item is answered as "traveling." Each item is scored between 0 and 5. According to the scoring system: (0): Unable to perform the activity 1. : Extremely difficult 2. : Very difficult 3. : Moderately difficult 4. : Slightly difficult 5. : Not difficult The total score ranges from 0 to 60. A score of 60 indicates that the individual can perform all activities without any difficulty.

    4 months

  • Sit and Reach Test : SRT

    It is a simple and widely used physical assessment test designed to evaluate an individual's level of flexibility. During the test, the individual sits on the floor with both legs extended straight and the soles of the feet placed against a box. A 26 cm ruler is placed on top of the box prepared for the measurement. The participant is asked to reach forward as far as possible without bending the knees. The farthest point reached is held for approximately 2 seconds, and the distance is recorded. The best result from two trials is taken and recorded in centimeters.

    4 months

  • Range of Motion : ROM

    Goniometric measurement is an objective method used in clinical settings to assess normal joint range of motion. During the measurement, the patient is positioned comfortably and appropriately for the joint being evaluated. Before beginning the assessment, the procedure is explained to the patient. All joints are aligned according to the anatomical position, and measurements are taken based on the zero starting position. Joint movements are generally assessed within a range of motion from 0° to 180°. Normal range of motion values for the upper and lower extremities and the vertebral column may vary depending on the reference source. In clinical practice, the most commonly used reference standards are those published by Kendall and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

    4 months

  • Manual Muscle Testing : MMT

    It is a clinical method used to assess muscle strength. The basis of these tests was developed by Dr. Robert W. Lovett, Professor of Orthopedics at Harvard Medical School, and was first applied in 1912. The evaluation is scored between 0 and 5 based on the muscle's performance against gravity. The interpretation of these scores may vary depending on the specific muscle being tested. 5 (Normal): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity and maximal external resistance. 4 (Good): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity but with less than maximal resistance. 3 (Fair): The muscle completes full range of motion against gravity but without any added resistance. 2 (Poor): The muscle completes full range of motion in a gravity-eliminated position. 1 (Trace): Muscle contraction is palpable, but no joint movement occurs. 0 (Zero): No muscle contraction is felt or observed.

    4 months

Study Arms (2)

Manual Techniques Group ( MTG )

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Within the scope of MTG's treatment program; during the first 20 minutes of the session, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) was applied to the lumbar region with three channels and a total of six electrodes, while infrared therapy was simultaneously combined and applied to the same region. Soft tissue and mobilization techniques were applied to the lumbar region and surrounding tissues for 15 minutes. Cupping massage and cupping therapy were performed for 5 minutes. Soft tissue mobilization with the Graston technique was applied for 5 minutes, and during the last 5 minutes of the session, a portable percussion massage device was used.

Other: Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques

MTRPG ( Manual Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group )

EXPERIMENTAL

In the treatment program of the MTRPG group, in addition to the treatment protocol applied in the MTG group, a reformer Pilates exercise program was implemented. Within this program, the session began with the Footwork series as a 5-10 minute warm-up. Subsequently, the exercises included the running exercise, frog exercise, leg circle series (up-down, circle, one leg side stretch), arm circle exercise series, pelvic lift, elephant exercise, and side stretch mermaid exercise, each performed for 10-15 repetitions. The final 5 minutes of the 50-minute reformer Pilates session consisted of child's pose and spinal stretching series.

Other: Manual and Physiotherapy Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group

Interventions

Within the scope of MTG's treatment program, during the first 20 minutes of the session, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) was applied to the lumbar region with three channels and a total of six electrodes, simultaneously combined with infrared therapy applied to the same area. Soft tissue and mobilization techniques were applied to the lumbar region and surrounding tissues for 15 minutes. Cupping massage and cupping therapy were performed for 5 minutes. The Graston technique was applied for 5 minutes to achieve soft tissue mobilization, and the final 5 minutes of the session were carried out using a portable percussion massage device.

Manual Techniques Group ( MTG )

n the treatment program of the MTRPG group, in addition to the treatment protocol applied in the MTG group, a reformer Pilates exercise program was implemented. Within this program, the session began with the Footwork series as a 5-10 minute warm-up. Subsequently, the exercises included the running exercise, frog exercise, leg circle series (up-down, circle, one leg side stretch), arm circle exercise series, pelvic lift, elephant exercise, and side stretch mermaid exercise, each performed for 10-15 repetitions. The final 5 minutes of the 50-minute reformer Pilates session consisted of child's pose and spinal stretching series.

MTRPG ( Manual Techniques and Reformer Pilates Group )

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 25 and 55 years
  • Female gender
  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • History of low back pain lasting longer than 12 weeks and diagnosis of mechanical low back pain (chronic low back pain)
  • No contraindications to exercise
  • No physical or mental condition preventing participation in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Age below 5 years or above 55 years
  • Low back pain lasting less than 12 weeks
  • Presence of chronic comorbid disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, or other systemic conditions)
  • Regular use of medication
  • Presence of a neurological pathology
  • Any contraindication to exercise
  • Inability to establish verbal or visual communication
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Uskudar University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainPainMotor Activity

Interventions

Physical Therapy Modalities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Muhammed Fatih Kavak, Assistant Professor

    Uskudar University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2025

First Posted

December 15, 2025

Study Start

March 28, 2025

Primary Completion

July 19, 2025

Study Completion

July 19, 2025

Last Updated

December 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study Design

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL

Locations