Neural Mechanisms of Fatigue in Post-Acute Sequela of SARS-CoV-2
Motivated Decision-Making and Performance
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This proposal aims to understand the neurobiological mechanisms of fatigue in individuals with Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC). This knowledge will eventually provide candidate mechanisms to target with pharmacological intervention and inform rehabilitative care for those individuals suffering from symptoms of fatigue in PASC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
December 12, 2025
December 1, 2025
4.5 years
November 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Comparison between PASC and HC - difference in mean Assessment Error
The difference between the level of effort rated by participants, and their average grip force exerted on a grip force dynamometer. Compared between PASC and HC.
Baseline, during experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - difference in BBB permeability
Collected from and MRI sequence designed to measure BBB permeability.
Baseline, during MRI acquisition.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain that are sensitive to Assessment error as a function of disease state
We will examine an fMRI contrast, at the time of effort assessment, between HC and PASC groups. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Baseline, during experimental protocol.
The modulatory effect of BBB permeability on the relationship between Neural Activity and Effort Assessment
We will create a structural equation model that includes BBB permeability, fMRI activity, effort assessment behavior, and disease state (PASC/HC).
Baseline, during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in momentary subjective fatigue ratings
Measures of subjective fatigue will be collected on self report scale that ranges from 'not fatigued at all' to 'very fatigued'.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in Mean Acceptance Rate of Risky Effort Options between rested/baseline and fatigue choices
Proportion of decisions in which inviduals choice to accept a risky effort opitions over a sure effort option.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain encoding a difference in effort cost between rested/baseline and fatigue choices
We will examine a contrast between chosen effort value pre versus post fatigue, between the HC and PASC groups. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
The modulatory effect of BBB permeability on the relationship between Neural Activity and change effort-based decision-making
We will create a structural equation model that includes BBB permeability, fMRI activity, change in effort-based decision-making, and disease state (PASC/HC).
Baseline, fatigueing exertion, and during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in mean assessment error as a function of time
The difference between the level of effort rated by participants, and their average grip force exerted on a grip force dynamometer. Compared between PASC and HC.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in momentary subjective fatigue ratings as a function of time
Measures of subjective fatigue will be collected on self report scale that ranges from 'not fatigued at all' to 'very fatigued'.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - difference in BBB permeability as a function of time
Collected from and MRI sequence designed to measure BBB permeability.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain that are sensitive to Assessment error as a function of disease state and time
We will examine a contrast, at the time of effort assessment, between HC and PASC groups, and use time as a covariate. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Study Arms (2)
PASC Participants - Physical Fatigue Task
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Control Participants - Physical Fatigue Task
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Interventions
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 75 years old.
- Have received a clinical diagnosis of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC)/long COVID syndrome using the criteria specified by Thaweethai, et al., 2023 (JAMA). This symptom checklist provides a score based on the number and severity of symptoms. An individual with a score \>12 is classified as having PASC.
- Currently experiencing Fatigue/Brain Fog as assessed with the Post-COVID symptom checklist and the PedsQL questionnaire.
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological disorders including, but not limited to, stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease, or any other neuromuscular disease (self-report).
- Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric diseases such as depression and schizophrenia (self-report).
- Congestive heart failure.
- Peripheral artery disease with claudication.
- Cancer.
- Pulmonary or renal failure.
- Unstable angina.
- Uncontrolled hypertension (more than 190/110 mmHg).
- Severe aphasia.
- Orthopedic or pain conditions.
- Have had exposure to metal or metal implants, due to the hazardous effects of the magnetic field.
- If on immunomodulatory therapy, they must have been on that therapy for at least 6 months before the start of the study.
- Hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Neurological disorders including, but not limited to, stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease, or any other neuromuscular disease (self-report).
- Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric diseases such as depression and schizophrenia (self-report).
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vikram Chib, PhD
Johns Hopkins University; Kennedy Krieger Institute
Central Study Contacts
Vikram Chib, PhD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2025
First Posted
December 12, 2025
Study Start
July 16, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
December 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12