Pain Neuroscience Education in Physiotherapy Students: Effects on Knowledge and Attitudes
Investigation of the Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education on Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Pain in Physiotherapy Students
1 other identifier
interventional
155
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the immediate effects of a single-session Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) program on pain-related knowledge and attitudes among undergraduate physiotherapy students. The PNE session focuses on explaining pain neurophysiology, chronic pain mechanisms, central sensitization, and the biopsychosocial factors that influence pain. Participants complete validated questionnaires assessing pain knowledge, pain-related beliefs, and attitudes before and immediately after the intervention. The purpose of the study is to determine whether a brief educational session can produce immediate improvements in pain knowledge and pain-related attitudes across different academic years in physiotherapy students.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2025
CompletedDecember 9, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
November 27, 2025
November 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ)
The rNPQ assessed participants' knowledge of pain neurophysiology. The scale measures participants' knowledge level on topics such as pain mechanisms, neuropathic pain, central sensitization, and biopsychosocial components of pain. The scale consists of a total of 12 questions with "true", "false", or "I don't know" answers. Incorrect answers and answers marked as undecided receive 0 points. The scale is scored between 0 and 12, and pain knowledge increases as the score increases.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain Questionnaire (KNAP)
Participants' knowledge and attitudes towards pain were measured with the KNAP. The KNAP scale consists of 30 questions and is scored on a six-point Likert scale ranging from completely disagree to completely agree. The total score is between 0 and 150 points. A higher score from the scale indicates knowledge and attitudes that better reflect modern pain neuroscience.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT)
The PABS-PT was used to distinguish between biomedical and biopsychosocial orientations towards treating low back pain in physiotherapists. The scale is scored as 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree. Treatment orientation is measured in biomedical (factor 1) and biopsychosocial (factor 2) subscales. Subscale scores are calculated by simply summing the scores corresponding to the selected response for each item. The subscale with the highest score indicates the participant's dominant treatment orientation
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Health Care Providers' Pain Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS )
The HC-PAIRS was developed to examine the impact of attitudes and beliefs of health professionals on the clinical management of chronic nonspecific low back pain.The scale consists of 12 items, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree). After items 1 and 5 are reversed, the total score is calculated and ranges from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate a strong belief that low back pain is a legitimate cause of activity limitation and disability, and negative attitudes and beliefs of health professionals towards low back pain.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention
Study Arms (1)
Pain Neuroscience Education Group
EXPERIMENTALExperimental: Pain Neuroscience Education Group Arm Description: Single-group intervention arm receiving a 70-minute Pain Neuroscience Education session. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Interventions
The program consists of a single 70-minute Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) session, which includes explanations of pain neurophysiology, central sensitization, biopsychosocial pain concepts, and cognitive-behavioral factors influencing chronic pain. Delivered by a trained certified physiotherapist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergraduate physiotherapy and rehabilitation students (1st, 2nd, 3rd, or 4th year)
- Willing to participate and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Having previously received formal Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ayşe ŞİMŞEKlead
Study Sites (1)
Karabük University Faculty of Health Sciences
Karabük, 78050, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ayşe Şimşek, MSc
Karabuk University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant, PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2025
First Posted
December 9, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share