Comparison Between JAK Inhibitors and Traditional Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Comparison Between Haematological Parameters and Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Findings of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Recieving JAK Inhibitors Versus Traditional Treatment
1 other identifier
observational
72
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects about 1% of the world's population \[1\]. The disease is characterized by synovial membrane inflammation. The impact of RA on quality of life is significant, as it can lead to considerable disability, reduced mobility, and an increased risk of additional health complications \[2\]. CsDMARDs are the first-line drugs for RA treatment, of which methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone drug and monotherapy is recommended as the first choice (3). However, previous studies had shown that 50% of RA patients had poor treatment effect on methotrexate or inadequate response to re-medication after relapse, resulting in drug resistance (4), resulting in no significant relief of symptoms and still high disease activity. EULAR had indicated that interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors and JAK inhibitors may have advantages over other biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients who were not suitable for csDMARDs (5) Therefore, JAK inhibitors is used as monotherapy or combination therapy, which would provide a new strategy for clinical treatment. A few researches evaluated the relationship between PLT, RBC, Hb, red blood cells-platelet ratio (RPR), and the hemoglobin-platelet ratio (HPR) and RA disease activity. There is growing evidence that metrics like RDW and MPV, as well as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and others have been considered to be accurate, reliable inflammatory biomarkers in autoimmune illnesses\[6,7\] US has proven itself to be a useful imaging method for assessing articular and periarticular inflammation in small and large joints throughout the last years High resolution musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS), incorporating power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS), has demonstrated to be significantly more accurate than clinical evaluation in visualizing the inflammatory process. Furthermore, relatively few studies have examined ankle joint involvement in individuals with RA who lack symptoms \[8\].
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2026
ExpectedDecember 9, 2025
November 1, 2025
6 months
October 2, 2025
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
changes in hematological parameters as MLR
MLR were determined by dividing the abso- lute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count, the absolute platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count, and the absolute monocyte count by the absolute lymphocyte count, respec- tively
1 year
improvement in musculoskeletal ultrasound scores.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Two groups (1)rheumatoid arthritis receiving JAK inhibitors . (2) rheumatoid arthritis receiving tra
Interventions
Type of the study: * cross sectional study * two groups (1)rheumatoid arthritis receiving JAK inhibitors . (2) rheumatoid arthritis receiving traditional treatement 2.4. 2- Study Setting: Internal medicine department ,out patient rheumatology clinics of assuit university hospitals 2.4.3- study duration : October 2025 to October 2026 2.4. 4- Study subjects: 1. Inclusion criteria: * RA patients based on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classifcation criteria for RA. * Age; 18-60 2. Exclusion criteria: * the presence of other autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus or psoriatic arthritis), * history of active infections, malignancy, or chronic diseases affecting hematological * parameters (e.g., anemia unrelated to RA, chronic kidney disease) * RA patients in remission * pregnant and lactating female patients 3. Sample Size Calculation Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated
Eligibility Criteria
Two groups (1)rheumatoid arthritis receiving JAK inhibitors . (2) rheumatoid arthritis receiving traditional treatement
You may qualify if:
- RA patients based on the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classifcation criteria for RA.
- Age; 18-60
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of other autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus or psoriatic arthritis),
- history of active infections, malignancy, or chronic diseases affecting hematological
- parameters (e.g., anemia unrelated to RA, chronic kidney disease)
- RA patients in remission
- pregnant and lactating female patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2025
First Posted
December 9, 2025
Study Start
December 20, 2025
Primary Completion
June 20, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 20, 2026
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11