NCT07272317

Brief Summary

Radical prostatectomy faces the core dilemma of balancing functional preservation with tumor eradication. While nerve-sparing techniques improve urinary control, intraoperative tumor localization remains imprecise, resulting in positive surgical margin (PSM) rates of 11%-38% and elevated recurrence risk. Traditional preoperative 2D imaging fails to dynamically guide surgical boundaries. Although multimodal fusion studies (e.g., MRI or PSMA-PET/CT) attempt to address this, they struggle to achieve simultaneous precision in lesion identification and real-time spatial tracking. This study pioneers a PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion navigation system for the Da Vinci surgical robot, leveraging three innovations: PSMA-PET/MRI dual-modality synergy for subclinical lesion detection at millimeter resolution; Non-rigid point-cloud registration algorithms to dynamically compensate for intraoperative prostate deformation, enabling 3D ultrasound-PET/MRI elastic fusion; Utilizing the telipro port of the Da Vinci surgical robot to achieve intraoperative picture-in-picture navigation, real-time localization of the tumor boundary, and precise resection as well as precise protection.This study aims to verify the safety and effectiveness of the world's first PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion navigation system adapted for the Da Vinci surgical robot. This system is expected to reduce the positive margin rate to less than 10%, increase the rate of nerve preservation by 30%, shorten the postoperative urinary control recovery time to within 2 weeks, and establish a standard process for robotic surgery navigation. This will provide a new paradigm for precise surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
5mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
Dec 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 17, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 15, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Positive margin rate

    Positive margin rate (prostate radical specimens need to be stained with standard ink, and the contact between tumor cells and the ink surface of the surgical specimen is considered a positive margin; two pathologists with qualifications of associate chief physician or above (who need to have 5 years of prostate pathology diagnosis experience) blind to the patient information and independently read the films, if the two interpretations are inconsistent,the third senior pathologist (senior professional title) will review) .

    After being enrolled, the patient undergoes radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Around 7 to 10 days after the surgery, the pathological report will be available.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Nerve Preservation Success Rate, as assessed by International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score and maximum urine flow rate (Qmax)

    Follow-up was conducted for 6 months after the surgery.

  • Time to Urinary Continence Recovery

    Follow-up was conducted for 6 months after the surgery.

  • Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Level

    Follow-up was conducted for 6 months after the surgery.

  • Biochemical Recurrence Rate as assessed by PSA level after the surgery

    Follow-up was conducted for 6 months after the surgery.

  • Number of participants with postoperative complications as assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification system

    Follow-up was conducted for 6 months after the surgery.]

Study Arms (2)

experimental group(navigation-assisted RARP)

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group will use preoperative PSMA-PET/MRI and intraoperative ultrasound for multimodal fusion to construct a three-dimensional model and synchronize it in real time to the surgeon's control console through the Da Vinci surgical robot's Tilepro video integration module, and complete the anterior approach laparoscopic radical prostatectomy under this guidance.

Procedure: experimental group (navigation-assisted RARP)

Control group (traditional RARP)

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will undergo the anterior approach laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the conventional manner.

Interventions

Before the surgery, the prostate and lesions were delineated on PET/MRI: at least two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed the images and provided a unified report. The experimental group had the external contour of the prostate and the three-dimensional lesion schematic diagram delineated by the urologist. A BK5000 ultrasound probe was inserted into the rectum, the probe was fixed to the surgical bed frame by the stepper, and the real-time images of the prostate were captured by the ultrasound.The multimodal fusion of the three-dimensional lesion outlined by ultrasound and PSMA-PET/MRI was achieved through the built-in MIM software. Subsequently, picture-in-picture guidance was realized through the Da Vinci Tilepro functional module, and the edge of the lesion was marked with titanium clips. After the ultrasound probe was withdrawn, the peripheral resection of the prostate, nerve preserve or not were completed under the guidance of the titanium clips.

experimental group(navigation-assisted RARP)

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 90 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Target Population: Patients with clinical stage T3a, or T2 (with the lesion close to the surface of the prostate) scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
  • Age 50 - 80 years old;
  • Pathologically confirmed as prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 6 - 10);
  • PSMA-PET/MRI indicates extracapsular invasion of the lesion; ④ Signed informed consent and committed to completing follow-up.

You may not qualify if:

  • ① Metastasis (M1 stage) or lymph node metastasis (N1 stage);
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy or endocrine therapy history;
  • Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (ASA grade ≥ III); ④ Mental illness or cognitive impairment that cannot cooperate with assessment; ⑤ Participating in other interventional clinical trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shanghai General Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200080, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Sivarajan G, Prabhu V, Taksler GB, Laze J, Lepor H. Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

    PMID: 24007711BACKGROUND
  • Bakht MK, Beltran H. Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Jan;22(1):26-45. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00900-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

    PMID: 38977769BACKGROUND
  • Zhang L, Wu B, Zha Z, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Yuan J. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.

    PMID: 29970100BACKGROUND
  • Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

    PMID: 22405509BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Cheng Liu, Doctor

CONTACT

Jing Zhao, Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The research subjects are patients with T3a or T2 (with the lesion close to the surface of the prostate) prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in our hospital. The subjects were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. Patients in the control group received RARP according to the conventional method, while patients in the experimental group underwent preoperative PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion and RARP under real-time navigation assistance during the operation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Posted

December 9, 2025

Study Start

December 15, 2025

Primary Completion

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

December 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations