NCT05587192

Brief Summary

The goal of this prospective, single-center, single-arm trial is to evaluate the positive predictive values between 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model in patients with suspicious of prostate cancer. The main question and our aim to answer is: • Can these patients with clinically significant prostate cancer in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model undergo radical prostatectomy directly without prostate biopsy. Participants will be asked to accomplish the test of serum PSA, mpMRI, then, the eligible patients (The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was greater than or equal to 60 percent) need perform 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Finally, patients will receive radical prostatectomy directly if prostate cancer is considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 19, 2022

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 10, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 17, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

prostate cancerPSMA-1007PET-CTBiopsyprostate-specific antigenmpMRIDiagnosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer

    Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer which defined as Gleason score ≥ 3+4.

    Immediately after prostatectomy

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Detection rate of prostate cancer

    Immediately after prostatectomy

  • Detection of high-grade prostate cancer

    Immediately after prostatectomy

Study Arms (1)

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on USTC diagnostic model

EXPERIMENTAL

Patinets will complete the 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based USTC diagnostic model firstly. If clinically significant prostate cancer is considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Patinets will receive radical prostatectomy directly or undergo prostate biopsy according to patients own decisions, patients with negative results in prostate biopsy will be asked to complete rebiopsy after 3 months.

Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on diagnostic model

Interventions

All enrolled patients will receive 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based USTC diagnostic model before gaining the final pathological diagnosis to be used as experimental arm.

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on USTC diagnostic model

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (abnormal DRE or PSA);
  • Complete the test of serum PSA and examination of mpMRI;
  • ng/ml ≤serum total PSA\<100ng/ml;
  • The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was greater than or equal to 60 percent;
  • Prostate cancer is considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT;
  • Meet the surgical indications for radical prostatectomy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Incomplete information of serum PSA tests or mpMRI;
  • serum total PSA\<4ng/ml or ≥ 100 ng/ml;
  • The probability of the diagnostic model to predict clinically significant prostate cancer was less than 60 percent;
  • Prostate cancer is not considered by 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT;
  • Patients who have negative results in the previous prostate biopsy;
  • Patients refuse radical prostatectomy or still choose prostate biopsy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC

Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, Yang F, Yan X, Zhang S, Li N, Chen W. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.

    PMID: 35143424BACKGROUND
  • Rebello RJ, Oing C, Knudsen KE, Loeb S, Johnson DC, Reiter RE, Gillessen S, Van der Kwast T, Bristow RG. Prostate cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0.

    PMID: 33542230BACKGROUND
  • Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, Hwang EC, Zhou Q, Cleves A, Agoritsas T, Dahm P. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3519.

    PMID: 30185521BACKGROUND
  • Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

    PMID: 33172724BACKGROUND
  • Naji L, Randhawa H, Sohani Z, Dennis B, Lautenbach D, Kavanagh O, Bawor M, Banfield L, Profetto J. Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):149-154. doi: 10.1370/afm.2205.

    PMID: 29531107BACKGROUND
  • Duffy MJ. Biomarkers for prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and beyond. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Feb 25;58(3):326-339. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0693.

    PMID: 31714881BACKGROUND
  • Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Basile G, Cignoli D, Cirulli GO, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Cucchiara V, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):697-713. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

    PMID: 33358543BACKGROUND
  • Sathianathen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Davies L, Kasivisvanathan V, Punwani S, Moore CM, Kastner C, Barrett T, Van Den Bergh RC, Eddy BA, Gleeson F, Macpherson R, Bryant RJ, Catto JWF, Murphy DG, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048. Epub 2020 May 20.

    PMID: 32444265BACKGROUND
  • Berry B, Parry MG, Sujenthiran A, Nossiter J, Cowling TE, Aggarwal A, Cathcart P, Payne H, van der Meulen J, Clarke N. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study. BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/bju.15039. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

    PMID: 32124525BACKGROUND
  • Hubner N, Shariat S, Remzi M. Prostate biopsy: guidelines and evidence. Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jul;28(4):354-359. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000510.

    PMID: 29847523BACKGROUND
  • Tao T, Wang C, Liu W, Yuan L, Ge Q, Zhang L, He B, Wang L, Wang L, Xiang C, Wang H, Chen S, Xiao J. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data. Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:811866. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811866. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 35127526BACKGROUND
  • Neels OC, Kopka K, Liolios C, Afshar-Oromieh A. Radiolabeled PSMA Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 13;13(24):6255. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246255.

    PMID: 34944875BACKGROUND
  • Scheltema MJ, Chang JI, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, Nguyen QA, Ho B, Delprado W, Lee J, Thompson JE, Cusick T, Spriensma AS, Siriwardana AR, Yuen C, Kooner R, Hruby G, O'Neill G, Emmett L. Diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET) and multiparametric (mp)MRI to detect intermediate-grade intra-prostatic prostate cancer using whole-mount pathology: impact of the addition of 68 Ga-PSMA PET to mpMRI. BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:42-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14794. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

    PMID: 31287613BACKGROUND
  • Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, Rasiah K, Pattison DA, Yaxley J, Thomas P, Hutton AC, Agrawal S, Amin A, Blazevski A, Chalasani V, Ho B, Nguyen A, Liu V, Lee J, Sheehan-Dare G, Kooner R, Coughlin G, Chan L, Cusick T, Namdarian B, Kapoor J, Alghazo O, Woo HH, Lawrentschuk N, Murphy D, Hofman MS, Stricker P. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

    PMID: 34465492BACKGROUND
  • Meissner VH, Rauscher I, Schwamborn K, Neumann J, Miller G, Weber W, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Heck MM. Radical Prostatectomy Without Prior Biopsy Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

    PMID: 34887117BACKGROUND
  • Wang C, Dong Q, Liu X, Ni M, Xie Q, Xiao J, Tao T. Protocol for SNOTOB study: radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy following 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT based on a diagnostic model: a single-centre, single-arm, open-label study. BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 19;13(11):e073983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073983.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tao Tao, MD Ph.D

    The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor, Associate chief physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2022

First Posted

October 19, 2022

Study Start

November 10, 2022

Primary Completion

December 20, 2023

Study Completion

June 30, 2024

Last Updated

February 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations