Nalbuphine Timing Effects on Hemodynamics and Analgesia in Elderly Patients
TKA
Effects of Different Administration Timings of Nalbuphine on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the use of a tourniquet and controlled hypotension is common. However, ischemia-reperfusion injury induced by the tourniquet and inappropriate controlled hypotension can lead to cardiac and cerebral damage in patients. Consequently, maintaining hemodynamic stability, ensuring adequate cerebral perfusion, and achieving controlled blood pressure during the perioperative period are critical factors influencing patient outcomes. Postoperatively, patients typically experience moderate to severe pain. Severe postoperative pain can result in prolonged hospital stays, increased readmission rates, elevated opioid consumption, and associated nausea and vomiting. Therefore, exploring effective multimodal postoperative pain management strategies is essential. Nalbuphine, an opioid analgesic acting as a full kappa-receptor agonist and a partial mu-receptor antagonist, is considered to provide analgesic efficacy equivalent to morphine while potentially offering advantages in maintaining hemodynamic stability. This study aims to investigate the effects of administering equivalent doses of nalbuphine at different perioperative time points on analgesia and hemodynamics in elderly patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2026
December 9, 2025
December 1, 2025
11 months
November 17, 2025
December 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of participants at 30 minutes postoperatively.
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) is a tool used to quantify subjective pain intensity via a visual linear scale. Its core design involves a 10 cm straight line, with the left end marked "no pain" (0 points) and the right end "severe pain" (10 points). Patients mark a position on the line based on their perceived pain, and clinicians convert this to a 0-10 pain score by measuring the distance (in millimeters) from the marked point to the left end.
at 30 minutes postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Hemodynamic parameters at various perioperative time points, Parameters include blood pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP)
T0 (during anesthesia induction), T1 (5 minutes after induction ), T2 (before cement placement), T3 (5 minutes after cement placement), T4 (15minutes post-anesthesia ), T5 (15 minutes in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, PACU), and T6 (30 minutes in PACU).
Hemodynamic parameters at various perioperative time points,heart rate (HR).
T0 (during anesthesia induction), T1 (5 minutes after induction ), T2 (before cement placement), T3 (5 minutes after cement placement), T4 (15minutes post-anesthesia ), T5 (15 minutes in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, PACU), and T6 (30 minutes in PACU).
Postoperative pain assessment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
after extubation, and at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively.
Requirement for rescue analgesic medication within 24 hours postoperatively
within 24 hours postoperatively:
the number of participants requiring rescue analgesia
within 24 hours postoperatively
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group N0
EXPERIMENTALAnesthesia Induction: Dexamethasone (10 mg), midazolam (0.01-0.05 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg), etomidate (0.15-0.3 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.3-0.6 mg/kg) were administered intravenously. After complete neuromuscular blockade was achieved, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted (size selected according to body weight).Intravenous nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) was administered during anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was maintained by continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (4-12 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.15-0.3 μg/kg/min)
Group N1
EXPERIMENTALAnesthesia Induction: Dexamethasone (10 mg), midazolam (0.01-0.05 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg), etomidate (0.15-0.3 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.3-0.6 mg/kg) were administered intravenously. After complete neuromuscular blockade was achieved, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted (size selected according to body weight).Intravenous nalbuphine (0.2 mg/kg) was administered after cement implantation. Anesthesia was maintained by continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (4-12 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.15-0.3 μg/kg/min).
Control Group (Group C)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnesthesia Induction: Dexamethasone (10 mg), midazolam (0.01-0.05 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.2-0.4 μg/kg), etomidate (0.15-0.3 mg/kg), and atracurium (0.3-0.6 mg/kg) were administered intravenously. After complete neuromuscular blockade was achieved, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted Conventional induction and anesthesia was maintained by continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (4-12 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.15-0.3 μg/kg/min) were performed, with no intravenous nalbuphine administered for analgesia.
Interventions
A single intravenous injection of Nalbuphine Hydrochloride Injection (dose specified, e.g., 0.2 mg/kg) was administered to the patient during general anesthesia induction. Neither the control group nor intervention group N1 received the drug during this stage.The remainder of the anesthesia protocol was consistent across all three groups.
After intraoperative prosthesis placement, a single intravenous injection of nalbuphine hydrochloride injection (0.2 mg/kg), identical to that in Intervention Group N0) was administered. Neither the control group nor Intervention Group N0 received medication at this timing. All other anesthesia management procedures were standardized.
Conventional induction and anesthesia was maintained were performed, with no intravenous nalbuphine administered for analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All study participants voluntarily enrolled in the trial and provided written informed consent after being fully informed of the trial's purpose and significance
- Participants underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia
- Elderly participants (age ≥ 65 years), regardless of gender
- Body mass index (BMI) ranging from 18 kg/m² to 30 kg/m²
- Absence of psychiatric disorders, normal consciousness, and ability to communicate effectively
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III;
- No contraindications to the study medications
You may not qualify if:
- Study participants with uncontrolled or untreated hypertension (resting systolic/diastolic blood pressure \>180/100 mmHg)
- Individuals with severe respiratory diseases
- Subjects with abnormal liver or renal function (ALT and/or AST \>2.5 times the upper limit of normal, total bilirubin \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal, serum creatinine \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
- Individuals with a history of drug abuse, illicit drug use, or alcohol abuse, where alcohol abuse is defined as an average daily alcohol intake exceeding 2 units (1 unit = 360 mL of beer, 45 mL of 40% alcohol by volume spirits, or 150 mL of wine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital affiliated of Shandong First Medical University,
Jinan, Shandong, 250000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guo Liang, Ph.D
Qianfoshan Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
December 9, 2025
Study Start
October 28, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12