Meloxicam in Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Meloxicam for Postoperative Pain in Mohs Micrographic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore alternative methods of postoperative pain control in Mohs micrographic surgery. The main aims are:
- To provide more information to the Mohs surgery community regarding postoperative pain control.
- Reducing pain improves the overall comfort and well-being of patients, leading to a better post-operative experience.
- To provide patients with an alternative and potentially superior NSAID for pain control (compared to standard-of-care ibuprofen). Researchers will compare 1) a single of dose Meloxicam 7.5 mg, followed by acetaminophen 500 mg; 2) a single dose of Meloxicam 15 mg, followed by acetaminophen 500 mg; 3) a single dose of acetaminophen 500 mg, followed by alternating ibuprofen 200 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg to see which better moderate pain control and patient satisfaction. Participants will be asked to complete pain and patient satisfaction surveys.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 2, 2026
December 15, 2025
December 1, 2025
8 months
January 21, 2025
December 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the effect of the use of Meloxicam vs SoC on post-operative pain levels in participants undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery.
Pain levels at specified times post-operation (POD 0 and POD 1) will be compared among the three treatment groups. This will be collected via the Numeric Pain Scale, a 0-10 scale using descriptives faces to assess pain by the patient.
From enrollment to suture removal, wound check or flap takedown (7-21 days)
Study Arms (3)
Standard of Care (Acetaminophen/Ibuprofen)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis randomized control group will take a mandatory one-time dose of 500 mg acetaminophen with alternating 200 mg ibuprofen and 500 mg acetaminophen (standard of care) every 3 hours for pain.
Meloxicam 7.5 mg
EXPERIMENTALThis randomly assigned experimental group will take a mandatory one-time dose of oral Meloxicam 7.5 mg with as-needed acetaminophen 500 mg every 3 hours. Administration of Meloxicam will be upon completion of Mohs closure.
Meloxicam 15 mg
EXPERIMENTALThis randomly assigned experimental group will take a mandatory one-time dose of oral Meloxicam 15 mg with as-needed acetaminophen 500 mg every 3 hours. Administration of Meloxicam will be upon completion of Mohs closure.
Interventions
This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 7.5mg dose after Mohs closure.
This intervention is the mandatory oral Meloxicam 15mg dose after Mohs closure.
This randomized control group will take a mandatory one-time dose of 500 mg acetaminophen with alternating 200 mg ibuprofen and 500 mg acetaminophen (standard of care) every 3 hours for pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients who consents to the study and are undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery at the University of Oklahoma.
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, suspected to be pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study period will be excluded from participation.
- Chronic liver disease (chronic hepatitis, acute hepatitis, cirrhosis, NASH, NAFLD, alcoholic liver disease, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease)
- Chronic kidney disease stage III or greater,
- Aspirin-sensitive asthma
- History of chronic NSAID use
- Patients vulnerable to drug interactions
- GI bleeds
- Peptic ulcers
- Non-English speakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (7)
Limthongkul B, Samie F, Humphreys TR. Assessment of postoperative pain after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):857-63. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12166. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23464845BACKGROUNDBenzon HT. Practical management of pain. 2014;
BACKGROUNDEvans T, Nicholas TA, Sutton AV, Wysong A. How We Do It: Postoperative Pain Control in Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Feb 1;47(2):280-282. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002279. No abstract available.
PMID: 31809346BACKGROUNDSniezek PJ, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen, acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and acetaminophen and codeine for postoperative pain relief after Mohs surgery and cutaneous reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1007-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02022.x. Epub 2011 May 11.
PMID: 21561527BACKGROUNDFiroz BF, Goldberg LH, Arnon O, Mamelak AJ. An analysis of pain and analgesia after Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Jul;63(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.049.
PMID: 20542176BACKGROUNDSaco M, Golda N. Optimal timing of postoperative pharmacologic pain control in Mohs micrographic surgery: A prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Feb;82(2):495-497. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Jul 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 31374303BACKGROUNDAlam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M, Strasswimmer JM, Jiang SI, Cohen JL, Albano BJ, Batra P, Behshad R, Benedetto AV, Chan CS, Chilukuri S, Crocker C, Crystal HW, Dhir A, Faulconer VA, Goldberg LH, Goodman C, Greenbaum SS, Hale EK, Hanke CW, Hruza GJ, Jacobson L, Jones J, Kimyai-Asadi A, Kouba D, Lahti J, Macias K, Miller SJ, Monk E, Nguyen TH, Oganesyan G, Pennie M, Pontius K, Posten W, Reichel JL, Rohrer TE, Rooney JA, Tran HT, Poon E, Bolotin D, Dubina M, Pace N, Kim N, Disphanurat W, Kathawalla U, Kakar R, West DP, Veledar E, Yoo S. Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Dec;149(12):1378-85. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255.
PMID: 24080866BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lindsey Collins, MD
University of Oklahoma, Department of Dermatology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Randomization will occur on which of the 3 groups each patient will be enrolled in, thus the investigators and participants will know which group they are in.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2025
First Posted
October 1, 2025
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 2, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 2, 2026
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share