NCT07266896

Brief Summary

Rehabilitation of severely atrophic edentulous maxillae with dental implants pose a significant clinical challenge. Immediate loading in grafted bone is often debated due to concerns about stress distribution and osseointegration. This study aimed to compare stress distribution in the maxilla using three full-arch implant configurations-all-on-four, all-on-six, and quad-zygomatic implants-in a single patient, to determine the safest and most favorable approach for immediate loading in grafted bone. Two CBCT scans from a 64-year-old female patient, before and after bone grafting (allograft with onlay grafting and sinus augmentation), were used to generate three patient-specific finite element models. Each model included the maxilla, implants in the respective configuration, abutments, and a full-arch prosthesis. Von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone, implants, abutments, and prosthesis, as well as maximum bone displacement, were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the all-on-six configuration provided the most favorable biomechanical outcome, with homogeneous cortical stress distribution, reduced stress in implants and prosthesis, and bone displacement fully compatible with immediate loading in grafted bone. The all-on-four model showed stress peaks at tilted abutments and cantilevers, whereas the quad-zygomatic model distributed implant and abutment stresses efficiently but induced higher cortical bone stresses, still within physiological limits.This patient-specific digital twin study demonstrates that immediate loading in full-arch grafted bone is biomechanically safe and optimal, with the all-on-six configuration providing superior stress distribution. These findings support clinical decision-making for immediate loading protocols and highlight the value of patient-specific FEA in planning complex maxillary rehabilitations.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 2, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 2, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 2, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Stress distribution in the Maxillary Bone

    Finite element analysis (FEA) a numerical simulation method that models how mechanical forces affect anatomical structures. This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the maxillary bone. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).

    At inclusion

  • Stress distribution in the Implants

    Finite element analysis (FEA). This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the implant. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).

    At inclusion

  • Stress distribution in the Prosthesis

    Finite element analysis (FEA). This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the prosthesis. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).

    At inclusion

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of the digital model digital twin of real patient

    At inclusion

Interventions

CBTS Scans (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) perform as part of routine care

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Edentulous maxillae, have had full-arch bone reconstruction in order to use the scanner before the bone graft and the scanner after the bone graft and simulate two configurations (all on four and quad zygomatic) on the digital model from the first scanner, and one implant configuration (all on six) on the digital model from the second scanner.

You may qualify if:

  • Edentulous maxillae, have had full-arch bone reconstruction

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU de Nice

Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrophic Maxilla

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMaxillary DiseasesJaw DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Posted

December 5, 2025

Study Start

November 2, 2023

Primary Completion

November 2, 2023

Study Completion

November 2, 2023

Last Updated

December 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations