Patient-specific Finite Element Analysis of Immediate Loading in the Edentulous Maxilla: Comparison of Three Implant Configurations Using Digital Twins.
1 other identifier
observational
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rehabilitation of severely atrophic edentulous maxillae with dental implants pose a significant clinical challenge. Immediate loading in grafted bone is often debated due to concerns about stress distribution and osseointegration. This study aimed to compare stress distribution in the maxilla using three full-arch implant configurations-all-on-four, all-on-six, and quad-zygomatic implants-in a single patient, to determine the safest and most favorable approach for immediate loading in grafted bone. Two CBCT scans from a 64-year-old female patient, before and after bone grafting (allograft with onlay grafting and sinus augmentation), were used to generate three patient-specific finite element models. Each model included the maxilla, implants in the respective configuration, abutments, and a full-arch prosthesis. Von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone, implants, abutments, and prosthesis, as well as maximum bone displacement, were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the all-on-six configuration provided the most favorable biomechanical outcome, with homogeneous cortical stress distribution, reduced stress in implants and prosthesis, and bone displacement fully compatible with immediate loading in grafted bone. The all-on-four model showed stress peaks at tilted abutments and cantilevers, whereas the quad-zygomatic model distributed implant and abutment stresses efficiently but induced higher cortical bone stresses, still within physiological limits.This patient-specific digital twin study demonstrates that immediate loading in full-arch grafted bone is biomechanically safe and optimal, with the all-on-six configuration providing superior stress distribution. These findings support clinical decision-making for immediate loading protocols and highlight the value of patient-specific FEA in planning complex maxillary rehabilitations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2025
CompletedDecember 5, 2025
November 1, 2025
Same day
November 25, 2025
November 25, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Stress distribution in the Maxillary Bone
Finite element analysis (FEA) a numerical simulation method that models how mechanical forces affect anatomical structures. This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the maxillary bone. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).
At inclusion
Stress distribution in the Implants
Finite element analysis (FEA). This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the implant. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).
At inclusion
Stress distribution in the Prosthesis
Finite element analysis (FEA). This technique visualizes stress, tension, compression and displacement zones in the prosthesis. Stress values are expressed in megapascals (MPa) and displacements in microns (μm).
At inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of the digital model digital twin of real patient
At inclusion
Interventions
CBTS Scans (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) perform as part of routine care
Eligibility Criteria
Edentulous maxillae, have had full-arch bone reconstruction in order to use the scanner before the bone graft and the scanner after the bone graft and simulate two configurations (all on four and quad zygomatic) on the digital model from the first scanner, and one implant configuration (all on six) on the digital model from the second scanner.
You may qualify if:
- Edentulous maxillae, have had full-arch bone reconstruction
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Nice
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2025
First Posted
December 5, 2025
Study Start
November 2, 2023
Primary Completion
November 2, 2023
Study Completion
November 2, 2023
Last Updated
December 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11