NCT06129695

Brief Summary

Evaluation of computer guided placement of Zygomatic implants utilizing intra sinus versus extra sinus surgical approach for the reconstruction of atrophic maxilla. The expected benefit from the current study is to select the most suitable approach for Zygomatic implant placement with the least postoperative complications

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 4, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Zygoamtic implants, Dental implants, Atrophic maxilla, Intra sinus, Extra sinus and Full mouth rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    1-10

    operation day and first week

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Crestal bone loss around zygomatic implants

    after 6 months

  • Post operative complications

    1st week , first month , third month and sixth month

Study Arms (2)

Computer guided intra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.

EXPERIMENTAL

After reflection of mucoperiosteal flap then the non-working tip of the coarse diamond bur will be inserted till the initial marking point and further preparation of osteotomy site will be performed along the lateral wall of maxillary sinus then sinus membrane will be reflected gently to get easily access for 3.5 mm drill or 4-4.5 mm diameter Zygomatic implant. The surgical stent will be inserted inside the patient's mouth; it will be adapted and held in place by the anchoring screws to Zygoma and osteotomy will progressively widened by using standard 2.9 mm diameter drill and 3.5 mm twist diameter drill. Depth indicator will be used to determine the length of Zygomatic implant. Zygomatic implant will be placed. The platform of Zygomatic implant will be emerged over and close to the top of the crest of the residual alveolar ridge near to first molar region. Closure will done with 3-0 silk suture.

Procedure: Zygomatic implants

Computer guided extra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After adequate exposure of surgical The surgical stent will inserted inside the patient's mouth; it will adapted and held in place by the anchoring screws to Zygoma and osteotomy will progressively widened by using standard 2.9 mm diameter drill and 3.5 mm twist diameter drill. Depth indicator will be used to determine the length of Zygomatic implant. Zygomatic implant that will placed. The platform of Zygomatic implant will be emerged over and close to the top of the crest of the residual alveolar ridge near to first molar region. Closure will done with 3-0 silk suture.

Procedure: Zygomatic implants

Interventions

the ideal way to support implant-based restorative procedures for full and partially edentulous patients who are missing bone in the upper posterior maxilla.

Computer guided extra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.Computer guided intra sinus approach for Zygomatic implant placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with severely atrophic edentulous upper arch (Cawood class IV, V, VI) that could not be restored by other type of treatment
  • Patients who had at least 8-12 mm vertical bone height in anterior maxilla to allow installation of 2 conventional implants.
  • Lacking posterior maxillary bone support due to significant sinus pneumatistion
  • Good systemic health (ASA score I-II)
  • Highly motivated patients.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient not willing to give his/her informed consent.
  • Patients with systemic disease that did not permit the surgical procedure (including general anaesthesia).
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes or under bisphosphonate therapy.
  • Heavy smoker.(\> 20 cigarettes daily)
  • Patient with psychiatric problems, severe bruxism or other parafunctional habits.
  • Acute sinusitis.
  • Malignancy or pathology in Maxilla or Zygoma.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Cairo, 12311, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Ishak MI, Abdul Kadir MR, Sulaiman E, Abu Kasim NH. Finite element analysis of different surgical approaches in various occlusal loading locations for zygomatic implant placement for the treatment of atrophic maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;41(9):1077-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 May 9.

    PMID: 22575179BACKGROUND
  • Davo R, Malevez C, Rojas J. Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma implants: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S44-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60007-9.

    PMID: 17618933BACKGROUND
  • Jain DK, Pal US, Mohammad S, Mehrotra D, Katrolia R, Shandilya S, Yadav L, Tiwari AK. Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Nov-Dec;12(6):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Sep 10.

    PMID: 36212616BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrophic Maxilla

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMaxillary DiseasesJaw DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Abdulrahman Adnan Aldakka, B.D.S

CONTACT

Ramy Ragab El-Beialy, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Each patient will be given a code by the researcher and the observers will be blind to which group this case belong. Patients, radiographic outcome assessor and statistician will be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 1. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. 2. Parallel group study. 3. Allocation Ratio 1:1.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Master's degree candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2023

First Posted

November 13, 2023

Study Start

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

February 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations