Study of Student Flourishing
A Multi-Institutional Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Trial of Student Well-Being Using the Flourish App
1 other identifier
interventional
2,500
3 countries
11
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn how a science-based mobile app, called Flourish, affects student well-being. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does receiving access to the Flourish app increase well-being (e.g., positive affect, loneliness, belonging) among students?
- 2.Does using the Flourish app in combination with a human buddy/friend lead to better outcomes than using the app alone?
- 3.Waitlist Control Group: Students continue with existing school resources.
- 4.Flourish App Group: Students use the Flourish app (a digital toolkit and AI chatbot) twice per week.
- 5.Flourish App + Buddy Group: Students use the Flourish app twice per week with someone else as a "Flourish Buddy".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy
Started Sep 2025
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 18, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
November 21, 2025
December 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Subcomponents of Affect Scale
The Subcomponents of Affect Scale (SAS) is an 18-item measure of affect, divided into nine positive and nine negative adjectives. Positive subscales include calm, well-being, and vigor, while negative subscales include depression, anxiety, and anger. Participants rate each adjective from 0 (not at all accurate) to 4 (extremely accurate) based on their feelings over the past two weeks. Total scores for positive and negative affect are summed from their subscales.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Implicit Theories of Emotion
Implicit theories of emotion were assessed using the Implicit Theories of Emotion Scale, adapted from Dweck's Implicit Theories of Intelligence framework. The scale includes four items assessing beliefs about whether emotions are malleable (incremental) or fixed (entity). Participants rate each item on a 6-point scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). The two entity items are reverse-scored, and all items are averaged to create a single score ranging from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating stronger endorsement of an incremental (malleable) theory of emotion.
Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Loneliness
The UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale is a brief measure assessing subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 3-point scale, from 1 (hardly ever) to 3 (often), with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived Cohesion
The Perceived Cohesion Scale measures a sense of belonging and morale within a community using a Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). For our purposes, we use a single-item version: "I see myself as part of the campus community."
Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Closeness to University
Closeness to one's university was assessed using a modified single-item Inclusion of Other in the Self measure. Participants were shown seven pairs of increasingly overlapping circles and asked, "Which picture best describes your relationship with your university?" Responses range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater perceived closeness to the university.
Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Perceived Social Support (PSSS-3)
Perceived social support was assessed using a 3-item short form based on the ACO (PSSS-A6) and adapted from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 1 ("Very Strongly Disagree") to 7 ("Very Strongly Agree"). Total scores are summed, yielding a range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater perceived social support.
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Mindfulness (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale)
Mindfulness was assessed using a 5-item short form of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), modified to assess experiences over the past two weeks. Participants rate each item on a 7-point scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 6 ("Very much"). Items are averaged to create a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores reflecting lower mindfulness. For interpretability in analyses, this score is reverse-scored so that higher values indicate greater mindfulness.
Baseline and 6 weeks post-baseline
Resilience
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) is a 6-item measure of stress recovery, rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a stronger ability to "bounce back" after setbacks.
Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Flourishing Scale
The Flourishing Scale is an 8-item measure of psychological well-being. Respondents rate items from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 7 ("Strongly agree"), yielding a total score range from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater well-being and flourishing.
Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Retention / Enrollment Intention
Retention intention was assessed using 2 items evaluating students' likelihood of continuing their enrollment. Participants respond to "How likely are you to stay enrolled next quarter/semester?" on a 5-point scale from 1 ("Very unlikely") to 5 ("Very likely"). A second item asks, "How often have you considered leaving your college/university in the past semester?" rated from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Very often"). Higher scores on the first item indicate greater intention to persist, while higher scores on the second item indicate greater consideration of leaving.
Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Depression (PHQ-2)
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Anxiety (GAD-2)
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Perceived Stress (PSS-4)
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
Academic Self Efficacy
Baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline
Satisfaction With Life
Baseline, bi-weekly for 6 weeks (3 time points)
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
6 weeks post-baseline
Study Arms (3)
Flourish app condition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks.
Flourish app with buddies condition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this condition will gain access to the Flourish app and be instructed to use it at least twice a week for 6 weeks. In addition, they will be instructed to invite a buddy (e.g., friend, family member) to join them on the app.
MHA Resources
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this condition will continue to use existing school resources and will be provided with information directing them to external Mental Health America (MHA) resources. Participants in this arm do not receive access to the Flourish app.
Interventions
A mobile application providing a science-based digital toolkit and AI chatbot.
Access to national mental health resources from Mental Health America, which can be found here: https://mhanational.org/resources/.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Currently a student at one of the participating institutions
- Age 18 or older
- Able to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720, United States
Foothill College
Los Altos Hills, California, 94022, United States
Chapman University
Orange, California, 92866, United States
University of Colorado Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822, United States
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas, 66506, United States
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, United States
University of Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, V8P 5C2, Canada
University of Canterbury
Christchurch, Canterbury, 8140, New Zealand
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2025
First Posted
December 2, 2025
Study Start
September 22, 2025
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Beginning upon submission for publication with no end date.
We will share de-identified participant data on OSF from each study timepoint across both conditions, including all data used in our analyses.