Comparison of IV Analgesia, Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, and ESP Block for Chronic Pain After Open Heart Surgery
TEA-ESPB-IV
A Comparative Evaluation of Intravenous Analgesia, Thoracic Epidural Analgesia, and Erector Spinae Plane Block on Chronic Postoperative Pain Following Open Heart Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective observational study aims to compare three routinely used postoperative analgesia techniques in patients undergoing open heart surgery: intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of these analgesia modalities on the development of chronic postoperative pain at 3 months. Secondary objectives include assessing postoperative acute pain scores, additional analgesic requirements, extubation time, mobilization time, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, respiratory complications, and the relationship between acute and chronic pain. No intervention is assigned by protocol, and all analgesia methods are applied as part of routine clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2026
CompletedDecember 2, 2025
November 1, 2025
10 months
November 19, 2025
November 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Chronic Postoperative Pain at 3 Months
Chronic postoperative pain will be assessed 3 months after surgery using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) and the S-LANSS questionnaire. Participants will be contacted via telephone or in-person follow-up. Chronic pain is defined as pain persisting beyond the expected healing period and lasting at least 3 months.
3 Months Postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Acute Postoperative Pain Scores
0-72 hours postoperative
Additional Analgesic Consumption
0-72 hours postoperative
Extubation Time
Up to 72 hours postoperative
Mobilization Time
Postoperative day 0-2
ICU Length of Stay
Up to 7 days
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Intravenous Analgesia Group (IV)
Participants who receive routine postoperative intravenous analgesia (opioid and/or non-opioid medications) as determined by the clinical anesthesia team. No protocol-assigned intervention is applied; analgesia is selected based on routine clinical practice.
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Group (TEA)
Participants who receive thoracic epidural analgesia via an epidural catheter placed preoperatively for postoperative pain control. TEA is administered according to institutional routine practice and is not assigned by the study protocol
Erector Spinae Plane Block Group (ESPB)
Participants who receive bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) performed preoperatively for postoperative analgesia. This block is a routine clinical procedure and is not assigned or modified by the study protocol.
Interventions
Routine postoperative intravenous analgesia (opioid and/or non-opioid medications) administered according to standard clinical care. This is not assigned by protocol and represents usual practice.
Thoracic epidural catheterization performed as part of routine postoperative analgesia management. This practice is determined by the clinical anesthesia team and not assigned by the study protocol.
Bilateral erector spinae plane block performed preoperatively as part of routine perioperative analgesia. The technique is applied at the discretion of the clinical anesthesia team and is not protocol-assigned.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients aged 18 to 85 years who are scheduled to undergo open heart surgery with median sternotomy at Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital. All participants will receive one of the routinely used postoperative analgesia methods (intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia, or erector spinae plane block) as determined by the clinical anesthesia team. Only patients classified as ASA physical status I-III and able to provide informed consent are included. Individuals with major comorbidities that interfere with participation, prior cardiac surgery, chronic pain treatment, or contraindications to routine analgesia methods are excluded.
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 to 85 years
- Classified as ASA physical status I-III
- Scheduled to undergo open heart surgery with median sternotomy
- BMI \< 35 kg/m²
- Able to understand and provide written informed consent
- Eligible to receive any of the routine analgesia methods (intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia, or erector spinae plane block)
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 or \> 85 years
- BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²
- Coagulation disorders
- Infection at the intervention site
- Known allergy to local anesthetics or induction agents
- Psychiatric disorders limiting cooperation
- Use of chronic pain medications, antidepressants, corticosteroids, antiepileptics, or routine analgesics
- Inability to cooperate, communicate, or follow commands
- Physical or verbal performance impairment
- Previous open heart surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karadeniz Technical University Farabi Hospital
Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Yu H, Zheng JQ, Hua YS, Ren SF, Yu H. Influence of volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia on chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials criteria: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Nov 27;20(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3742-4.
PMID: 31775854BACKGROUNDMartorella G, McDougall GJ Jr. Barriers and Facilitators to the Prevention of Chronic Pain in the Subacute Phase After Cardiac Surgery. Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Feb;22(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
PMID: 33189543BACKGROUNDYan H, Chen W, Chen Y, Gao H, Fan Y, Feng M, Wang X, Tang H, Yin J, Qian Y, Ding M, Cang J, Miao C, Wang H. Opioid-Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia on Postoperative Pain After Thoracoscopic Surgery: The Use of Intravenous and Epidural Esketamine. Anesth Analg. 2023 Aug 1;137(2):399-408. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006547. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
PMID: 37267129BACKGROUNDElsharkawy H, Clark JD, El-Boghdadly K. Evidence for regional anesthesia in preventing chronic postsurgical pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb 5;50(2):153-159. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105611.
PMID: 39909548BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 19, 2025
First Posted
December 2, 2025
Study Start
February 15, 2025
Primary Completion
December 20, 2025
Study Completion
April 20, 2026
Last Updated
December 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The study is based on clinical follow-up data collected for a single-center observational thesis project, and no data sharing plan has been established.