NCT06424938

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural block or erector spinae plane block applied for postoperative analgesia in gynecological cancer surgeries. The main question(s) it aims to answer are: \[Is erector spinae plane block as effective as epidural block in postoperative analgesia?\] The study was designed as a prospective randomized study. Researchers evaluated the effects of epidural block or erector spinae plane block applied for postoperative analgesia on pain scores, postoperative opioid use, and mobilization in patients undergoing gynecological cancer surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

May 14, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

postoperative analgesiaperiferic nerve blockneuraxial block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative numerical rating scale

    The primary purpose of this study is to compare NRS values at 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Numeric rating scale was used to assess postoperative pain For example, 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

    postoperatvely 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Intraoperative amount of remifentanyl

    intraoperative process

Other Outcomes (1)

  • postoperative mobilization time

    postoperatvely 24 hours

Study Arms (2)

The group in which epidural block

EXPERIMENTAL

The group in which epidural block is applied for postoperative analgesia (Group Epidural)

Procedure: Patients who underwent epidural blockProcedure: Patients who underwent erector spina plane block

The group in which erector spinae plane block

EXPERIMENTAL

The group in which erector spinae plane block is applied (Group ESP)

Procedure: Patients who underwent epidural blockProcedure: Patients who underwent erector spina plane block

Interventions

The researchers administered an epidural block to prevent post-operative pain to the epidural block group undergoing midline incision surgery for major gynecologic cancer.

The group in which epidural blockThe group in which erector spinae plane block

Researchers applied a erector spina plane block to prevent postoperative pain to the erector spina plane block group undergoing midline incision surgery for major gynecological cancer.

The group in which epidural blockThe group in which erector spinae plane block

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who will undergo open abdominal surgery
  • Patients with ASAII-III
  • Those between the ages of 30-70
  • Patients who are fully oriented and able to cooperate

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with ASAIV-V
  • Presence of active infection in the area where the block will be applied
  • Patients younger than 30 years old
  • Patients with BMI \> 40
  • Patients who are allergic to bupivacaine
  • Chronic analgesic use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Nelson G, Fotopoulou C, Taylor J, Glaser G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Meyer LA, Stone R, Mena G, Elias KM, Altman AD, Bisch SP, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jun;173:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

    PMID: 37086524BACKGROUND
  • Bisch SP, Jago CA, Kalogera E, Ganshorn H, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC, Nelson G. Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Apr;161(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.035. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

    PMID: 33388155BACKGROUND
  • Courtney-Brooks M, Tanner Kurtz KC, Pelkofski EB, Nakayama J, Duska LR. Continuous epidural infusion anesthesia and analgesia in gynecologic oncology patients: less pain, more gain? Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan;136(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

    PMID: 25449564BACKGROUND
  • Chen LM, Weinberg VK, Chen C, Powell CB, Chen LL, Chan JK, Burkhardt DH 3rd. Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Dec;115(3):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

    PMID: 19783285BACKGROUND
  • Ferguson SE, Malhotra T, Seshan VE, Levine DA, Sonoda Y, Chi DS, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

    PMID: 19395071BACKGROUND
  • Lin C, Gill R, Kumar K. [Bilateral lower thoracic erector spinae plane block in open abdominal gynecologic oncology surgery: a cases series]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Sep-Oct;69(5):517-520. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Oct 19.

    PMID: 31635757BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study was designed as a prospective randomized study. Patients with ASA II-III between the ages of 30 and 70 who will undergo major gynecological cancer surgery will be included in the study. They will be randomized into 2 groups: the group in which epidural block is applied for postoperative analgesia (Group Epidural) and the group in which erector spinae plane block is applied (Group ESP).
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2024

First Posted

May 22, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2025

Study Completion

January 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations