NCT07255573

Brief Summary

Small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) affects A-delta and C fibers and commonly presents with sensory symptoms and dysautonomia. Confirmation often relies on specialized tests such as quantitative sensory testing (QST) and sympathetic skin response (SSR). This prospective, single-center observational diagnostic-accuracy study will estimate the performance of the Water-Immersion Wrinkle Test (WIWT) for detecting SFN in adults evaluated by a neuromuscular service. The composite reference standard is specialist clinical assessment plus abnormality on ≥1 validated scale (Utah Early Neuropathy Scale \[UENS\] or modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score \[mTCNS\]). The index procedure (WIWT) is standardized as follows: both hands immersed to at least the distal interphalangeal crease for 15 minutes; immersion begins at 43-44 °C with expected passive cooling of \~2 °C every 5 minutes; temperature measured at 0, 5, 10 and 15 minutes; no water is added or replaced during immersion. After gentle drying, standardized photographs are obtained and wrinkling grades (0-4) are recorded for digits 2-5; the bilateral summed score is classified abnormal \<24 and normal ≥24. Examiners for WIWT, QST, and SSR are mutually blinded. The primary outcome is WIWT sensitivity and specificity versus the composite reference at baseline. Secondary outcomes include ROC area under the curve (AUC), positive/negative predictive values, and inter- and intra-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients). Recruitment is ongoing; anticipated primary completion: November 2025.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 20, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 8, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

small-fiber neuropathydysautonomiawater-immersion wrinkle testQSTSSR

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity and specificity of WIWT (%) vs composite reference (clinical + UENS/mTCNS abnormality)

    WIWT scoring: Each fingertip (digits 2-5 of both hands) is graded 0-4 after immersion (0 = no wrinkling; 4 = marked wrinkling). Per-hand sum 0-16; bilateral sum 0-32 (higher = more wrinkling/normal sympathetic function). Threshold to define test result: bilateral sum \<24 = abnormal, ≥24 = normal. Procedure: Hands immersed 15 min, starting 43-44 °C with passive cooling ≈2 °C/5 min to \~37-38 °C; temperature checked at 0, 5, 10 min; no water added or replaced; standardized photographs scored by blinded raters. Reference standard: Neuromuscular specialist clinical assessment plus abnormality on ≥1 validated scale (UENS or mTCNS). Metrics: Sensitivity = TP/(TP+FN); Specificity = TN/(TN+FP); both reported as percent (%) with 95% CIs.

    Baseline (single visit; same-day completion of all tests)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • ROC Area Under the Curve (AUC) for WIWT

    Baseline

  • Positive and Negative Predictive Values (PPV, NPV) of WIWT

    Baseline

  • Inter-rater Reliability of WIWT Wrinkle Scoring (ICC)

    Within 7 days (two image-rating sessions separated by 48 h-7 days).

  • Intra-rater Reliability of WIWT Wrinkle Scoring (ICC)

    48 h-7 days between sessions.

  • Comparative Diagnostic Performance: WIWT vs QST and SSR (AUC, Se/Sp)

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

SFN Group

Adults evaluated in a tertiary neuromuscular clinic who, after baseline assessment, are classified as having small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) by the prespecified composite reference standard. The reference integrates (1) neuromuscular specialist clinical judgment (history and focused examination) and (2) abnormality on ≥1 validated scale (UENS or mTCNS) using published scoring rules. Group assignment is independent of WIWT, QST, or SSR results; these tests may be performed as index/comparator procedures but do not define cohort membership.

Control Group

Adults evaluated in a tertiary neuromuscular clinic who, after baseline assessment, are classified as No Small-Fiber Neuropathy (No SFN) by the prespecified composite reference. This cohort includes healthy adult volunteers with no neuropathic symptoms or signs, a normal neurological examination, and normal UENS and mTCNS scores per published rules. Group assignment is independent of WIWT, QST, or SSR results; these tests may be performed as index/comparator procedures but do not define cohort membership.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults evaluated at the Neuromuscular Department and Neurophysiology Laboratory of Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (Argentina), a tertiary referral center. The source population includes consecutive clinic patients referred for assessment of suspected small-fiber neuropathy and healthy adult volunteers recruited from the hospital community. Recruitment occurs during routine outpatient activity; all index/comparator testing is performed on site.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Suspicion of small-fiber neuropathy based on history and/or physical examination by a neuromuscular neurology specialist.
  • Sensory and motor nerve conduction studies within normal limits.
  • Prior QST performed, regardless of result.
  • Prior SSR performed, regardless of result.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 18 years.
  • Individuals who do not wish to participate in the study or who decline informed consent.
  • Patients with any contraindication to any of the aforementioned studies.
  • Neurophysiological studies demonstrating large-fiber involvement.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., 1428, Argentina

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Piedrafita Vico LA, Reisin R, Gonorazky S. Teaching NeuroImage: Absence of Wrinkles in Small Fiber Neuropathy. Neurology. 2022 Nov 22;99(21):962-963. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201320. Epub 2022 Sep 13. No abstract available.

    PMID: 36100436BACKGROUND
  • Clark CV, Pentland B, Ewing DJ, Clarke BF. Decreased skin wrinkling in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1984 May-Jun;7(3):224-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.3.224.

    PMID: 6734390BACKGROUND
  • Braham J, Sadeh M, Sarova-Pinhas I. Skin wrinkling on immersion of hands: a test of sympathetic function. Arch Neurol. 1979 Feb;36(2):113-4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500380083013.

    PMID: 420620BACKGROUND
  • Teoh HL, Chow A, Wilder-Smith EP. Skin wrinkling for diagnosing small fibre neuropathy: comparison with epidermal nerve density and sympathetic skin response. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;79(7):835-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.140947. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

    PMID: 18270233BACKGROUND
  • Wilder-Smith EP, Guo Y, Chow A. Stimulated skin wrinkling for predicting intraepidermal nerve fibre density. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May;120(5):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

    PMID: 19375384BACKGROUND
  • Wilder-Smith EP. Stimulated skin wrinkling as an indicator of limb sympathetic function. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jan;126(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

    PMID: 25216595BACKGROUND
  • Cales L, Weber RA. Effect of water temperature on skin wrinkling. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Jul;22(4):747-9. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80141-4.

    PMID: 9260639BACKGROUND
  • Singleton JR, Bixby B, Russell JW, Feldman EL, Peltier A, Goldstein J, Howard J, Smith AG. The Utah Early Neuropathy Scale: a sensitive clinical scale for early sensory predominant neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2008 Sep;13(3):218-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2008.00180.x.

    PMID: 18844788BACKGROUND
  • Abraham A, Barnett C, Katzberg HD, Lovblom LE, Perkins BA, Bril V. Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score is valid for a wide spectrum of polyneuropathies. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):484-490. doi: 10.1111/ene.13533. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

    PMID: 29194856BACKGROUND
  • Galosi E, Falco P, Di Pietro G, Leone C, Esposito N, De Stefano G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. The diagnostic accuracy of the small fiber neuropathy symptoms inventory questionnaire (SFN-SIQ) for identifying pure small fiber neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2022 Dec;27(4):283-290. doi: 10.1111/jns.12513. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

    PMID: 36175394BACKGROUND
  • Bril V, Tomioka S, Buchanan RA, Perkins BA; mTCNS Study Group. Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02667.x.

    PMID: 19317818BACKGROUND
  • Zilliox LA, Ruby SK, Singh S, Zhan M, Russell JW. Clinical neuropathy scales in neuropathy associated with impaired glucose tolerance. J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Apr;29(3):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

    PMID: 25690405BACKGROUND
  • Novak P. Electrochemical skin conductance: a systematic review. Clin Auton Res. 2019 Feb;29(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s10286-017-0467-x. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

    PMID: 28951985BACKGROUND
  • Terkelsen AJ, Karlsson P, Lauria G, Freeman R, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The diagnostic challenge of small fibre neuropathy: clinical presentations, evaluations, and causes. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Nov;16(11):934-944. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30329-0.

    PMID: 29029847BACKGROUND
  • Devigili G, Rinaldo S, Lombardi R, Cazzato D, Marchi M, Salvi E, Eleopra R, Lauria G. Diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy in clinical practice and research. Brain. 2019 Dec 1;142(12):3728-3736. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz333.

    PMID: 31665231BACKGROUND
  • Gendre T, Lefaucheur JP, Nordine T, Baba-Amer Y, Authier FJ, Devaux J, Creange A. Characterizing Acute-Onset Small Fiber Neuropathy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024 Mar;11(2):e200195. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200195. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

    PMID: 38170952BACKGROUND
  • Devigili G, Cazzato D, Lauria G. Clinical diagnosis and management of small fiber neuropathy: an update on best practice. Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Sep;20(9):967-980. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1794825. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

    PMID: 32654574BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Small Fiber NeuropathyAutonomic Nervous System Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lucas A Piedrafita Vico, MD

    Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Posted

December 1, 2025

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion

November 1, 2025

Study Completion

November 20, 2025

Last Updated

December 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations